Cargando…

rhBMP in lumber fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP) and iliac crest autograft in the fusion treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS: The studies using randomized controlled trials to compare the rhBMP with iliac crest autograft in the treatment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Peng-Fei, Chen, Tao-Yu, Zhang, Zhi-Liang, Li, Xiao-Dong, Li, Peng-Cui, Wei, Lei, Lü, Zhi, Wei, Xiao-Chun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6529368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30745112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.10.003
_version_ 1783420360787492864
author Han, Peng-Fei
Chen, Tao-Yu
Zhang, Zhi-Liang
Li, Xiao-Dong
Li, Peng-Cui
Wei, Lei
Lü, Zhi
Wei, Xiao-Chun
author_facet Han, Peng-Fei
Chen, Tao-Yu
Zhang, Zhi-Liang
Li, Xiao-Dong
Li, Peng-Cui
Wei, Lei
Lü, Zhi
Wei, Xiao-Chun
author_sort Han, Peng-Fei
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP) and iliac crest autograft in the fusion treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS: The studies using randomized controlled trials to compare the rhBMP with iliac crest autograft in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis were retrieved from Embase, Pubmed, ProQuest dissertations & theses (PQDT), China national knowledge infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Database, Wanfang Data, Cochrane Library (from March 1998 to March 2018). Postoperative fusion rate, clinical success rate, postoperative intervertebral height, complications, operation time, blood loss and duration of hospitalization were chosen as the outcome indicators. Methodological quality of the trials was critically assessed, and relevant data were extracted. Statistical software Revman 5.3 was used for data-analysis. RESULTS: Eleven articles were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that, comparing the efficacy of rhBMP with iliac crest autograft, statistical significance was found in the 24-month fusion rate post operation [95% CI (1.38, 24.70), p = 0.02] and operation time [95% CI (−14.22, −2.08), p = 0.008]. There is not sufficient evidence for statistical differences in the remaining indicators. CONCLUSION: The current literature shows rhBMP is a safe and effective grafting material in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Further evidence is dependent on the emergence of more randomized controlled trials with higher quality and larger sample sizes in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6529368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65293682019-05-28 rhBMP in lumber fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Han, Peng-Fei Chen, Tao-Yu Zhang, Zhi-Liang Li, Xiao-Dong Li, Peng-Cui Wei, Lei Lü, Zhi Wei, Xiao-Chun Chin J Traumatol Systematic Review and Meta-analysis PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP) and iliac crest autograft in the fusion treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS: The studies using randomized controlled trials to compare the rhBMP with iliac crest autograft in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis were retrieved from Embase, Pubmed, ProQuest dissertations & theses (PQDT), China national knowledge infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Database, Wanfang Data, Cochrane Library (from March 1998 to March 2018). Postoperative fusion rate, clinical success rate, postoperative intervertebral height, complications, operation time, blood loss and duration of hospitalization were chosen as the outcome indicators. Methodological quality of the trials was critically assessed, and relevant data were extracted. Statistical software Revman 5.3 was used for data-analysis. RESULTS: Eleven articles were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that, comparing the efficacy of rhBMP with iliac crest autograft, statistical significance was found in the 24-month fusion rate post operation [95% CI (1.38, 24.70), p = 0.02] and operation time [95% CI (−14.22, −2.08), p = 0.008]. There is not sufficient evidence for statistical differences in the remaining indicators. CONCLUSION: The current literature shows rhBMP is a safe and effective grafting material in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Further evidence is dependent on the emergence of more randomized controlled trials with higher quality and larger sample sizes in the future. Elsevier 2019-02 2019-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6529368/ /pubmed/30745112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.10.003 Text en © 2019 Chinese Medical Association. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Han, Peng-Fei
Chen, Tao-Yu
Zhang, Zhi-Liang
Li, Xiao-Dong
Li, Peng-Cui
Wei, Lei
Lü, Zhi
Wei, Xiao-Chun
rhBMP in lumber fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title rhBMP in lumber fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full rhBMP in lumber fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr rhBMP in lumber fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed rhBMP in lumber fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short rhBMP in lumber fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort rhbmp in lumber fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6529368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30745112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.10.003
work_keys_str_mv AT hanpengfei rhbmpinlumberfusionforlumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chentaoyu rhbmpinlumberfusionforlumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangzhiliang rhbmpinlumberfusionforlumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lixiaodong rhbmpinlumberfusionforlumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lipengcui rhbmpinlumberfusionforlumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT weilei rhbmpinlumberfusionforlumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luzhi rhbmpinlumberfusionforlumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT weixiaochun rhbmpinlumberfusionforlumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis