Cargando…
rhBMP in lumber fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP) and iliac crest autograft in the fusion treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS: The studies using randomized controlled trials to compare the rhBMP with iliac crest autograft in the treatment...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6529368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30745112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.10.003 |
_version_ | 1783420360787492864 |
---|---|
author | Han, Peng-Fei Chen, Tao-Yu Zhang, Zhi-Liang Li, Xiao-Dong Li, Peng-Cui Wei, Lei Lü, Zhi Wei, Xiao-Chun |
author_facet | Han, Peng-Fei Chen, Tao-Yu Zhang, Zhi-Liang Li, Xiao-Dong Li, Peng-Cui Wei, Lei Lü, Zhi Wei, Xiao-Chun |
author_sort | Han, Peng-Fei |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP) and iliac crest autograft in the fusion treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS: The studies using randomized controlled trials to compare the rhBMP with iliac crest autograft in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis were retrieved from Embase, Pubmed, ProQuest dissertations & theses (PQDT), China national knowledge infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Database, Wanfang Data, Cochrane Library (from March 1998 to March 2018). Postoperative fusion rate, clinical success rate, postoperative intervertebral height, complications, operation time, blood loss and duration of hospitalization were chosen as the outcome indicators. Methodological quality of the trials was critically assessed, and relevant data were extracted. Statistical software Revman 5.3 was used for data-analysis. RESULTS: Eleven articles were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that, comparing the efficacy of rhBMP with iliac crest autograft, statistical significance was found in the 24-month fusion rate post operation [95% CI (1.38, 24.70), p = 0.02] and operation time [95% CI (−14.22, −2.08), p = 0.008]. There is not sufficient evidence for statistical differences in the remaining indicators. CONCLUSION: The current literature shows rhBMP is a safe and effective grafting material in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Further evidence is dependent on the emergence of more randomized controlled trials with higher quality and larger sample sizes in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6529368 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65293682019-05-28 rhBMP in lumber fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Han, Peng-Fei Chen, Tao-Yu Zhang, Zhi-Liang Li, Xiao-Dong Li, Peng-Cui Wei, Lei Lü, Zhi Wei, Xiao-Chun Chin J Traumatol Systematic Review and Meta-analysis PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP) and iliac crest autograft in the fusion treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS: The studies using randomized controlled trials to compare the rhBMP with iliac crest autograft in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis were retrieved from Embase, Pubmed, ProQuest dissertations & theses (PQDT), China national knowledge infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Database, Wanfang Data, Cochrane Library (from March 1998 to March 2018). Postoperative fusion rate, clinical success rate, postoperative intervertebral height, complications, operation time, blood loss and duration of hospitalization were chosen as the outcome indicators. Methodological quality of the trials was critically assessed, and relevant data were extracted. Statistical software Revman 5.3 was used for data-analysis. RESULTS: Eleven articles were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that, comparing the efficacy of rhBMP with iliac crest autograft, statistical significance was found in the 24-month fusion rate post operation [95% CI (1.38, 24.70), p = 0.02] and operation time [95% CI (−14.22, −2.08), p = 0.008]. There is not sufficient evidence for statistical differences in the remaining indicators. CONCLUSION: The current literature shows rhBMP is a safe and effective grafting material in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Further evidence is dependent on the emergence of more randomized controlled trials with higher quality and larger sample sizes in the future. Elsevier 2019-02 2019-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6529368/ /pubmed/30745112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.10.003 Text en © 2019 Chinese Medical Association. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Han, Peng-Fei Chen, Tao-Yu Zhang, Zhi-Liang Li, Xiao-Dong Li, Peng-Cui Wei, Lei Lü, Zhi Wei, Xiao-Chun rhBMP in lumber fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | rhBMP in lumber fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | rhBMP in lumber fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | rhBMP in lumber fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | rhBMP in lumber fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | rhBMP in lumber fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | rhbmp in lumber fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6529368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30745112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.10.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanpengfei rhbmpinlumberfusionforlumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chentaoyu rhbmpinlumberfusionforlumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangzhiliang rhbmpinlumberfusionforlumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lixiaodong rhbmpinlumberfusionforlumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lipengcui rhbmpinlumberfusionforlumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT weilei rhbmpinlumberfusionforlumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT luzhi rhbmpinlumberfusionforlumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT weixiaochun rhbmpinlumberfusionforlumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |