Cargando…

Anatomical Variation of the Tibia – a Principal Component Analysis

Conventional anatomically contoured plates do not adequately fit most tibiae. This emphasizes the need for a more thorough morphological study. Statistical shape models are promising tools to display anatomical variations within a population. Herein, we aim to provide a better insight into the anato...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quintens, Liselore, Herteleer, Michiel, Vancleef, Sanne, Carette, Yannick, Duflou, Joost, Nijs, Stefaan, Sloten, Jos Vander, Hoekstra, Harm
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6529455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31114000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44092-8
_version_ 1783420390121406464
author Quintens, Liselore
Herteleer, Michiel
Vancleef, Sanne
Carette, Yannick
Duflou, Joost
Nijs, Stefaan
Sloten, Jos Vander
Hoekstra, Harm
author_facet Quintens, Liselore
Herteleer, Michiel
Vancleef, Sanne
Carette, Yannick
Duflou, Joost
Nijs, Stefaan
Sloten, Jos Vander
Hoekstra, Harm
author_sort Quintens, Liselore
collection PubMed
description Conventional anatomically contoured plates do not adequately fit most tibiae. This emphasizes the need for a more thorough morphological study. Statistical shape models are promising tools to display anatomical variations within a population. Herein, we aim to provide a better insight into the anatomical variations of the tibia and tibia plateau. Seventy-nine CT scans of tibiae were segmented, and a principal component analysis was performed. Five morphologically important parameters were measured on the 3D models of the mean tibial shapes as well as the −3SD and +3 SD tibial shapes of the first five components. Longer, wider tibiae are related to a more rounded course of the posterior column, a less prominent tip of the medial malleolus, and a more posteriorly directed fibular notch. Varus/valgus deformations and the angulation of the posterior tibia plateau represent only a small percentage of the total variation. Right and left tibiae are not always perfectly symmetrical, especially not at the level of the tibia plateau. The largest degree of anatomical variation of the tibia is found in its length and around the tibia plateau. Because of the large variation in the anatomy, a more patient-specific approach could improve implant fit, anatomical reduction, biomechanical stability and hardware-related complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6529455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65294552019-05-30 Anatomical Variation of the Tibia – a Principal Component Analysis Quintens, Liselore Herteleer, Michiel Vancleef, Sanne Carette, Yannick Duflou, Joost Nijs, Stefaan Sloten, Jos Vander Hoekstra, Harm Sci Rep Article Conventional anatomically contoured plates do not adequately fit most tibiae. This emphasizes the need for a more thorough morphological study. Statistical shape models are promising tools to display anatomical variations within a population. Herein, we aim to provide a better insight into the anatomical variations of the tibia and tibia plateau. Seventy-nine CT scans of tibiae were segmented, and a principal component analysis was performed. Five morphologically important parameters were measured on the 3D models of the mean tibial shapes as well as the −3SD and +3 SD tibial shapes of the first five components. Longer, wider tibiae are related to a more rounded course of the posterior column, a less prominent tip of the medial malleolus, and a more posteriorly directed fibular notch. Varus/valgus deformations and the angulation of the posterior tibia plateau represent only a small percentage of the total variation. Right and left tibiae are not always perfectly symmetrical, especially not at the level of the tibia plateau. The largest degree of anatomical variation of the tibia is found in its length and around the tibia plateau. Because of the large variation in the anatomy, a more patient-specific approach could improve implant fit, anatomical reduction, biomechanical stability and hardware-related complications. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6529455/ /pubmed/31114000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44092-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Quintens, Liselore
Herteleer, Michiel
Vancleef, Sanne
Carette, Yannick
Duflou, Joost
Nijs, Stefaan
Sloten, Jos Vander
Hoekstra, Harm
Anatomical Variation of the Tibia – a Principal Component Analysis
title Anatomical Variation of the Tibia – a Principal Component Analysis
title_full Anatomical Variation of the Tibia – a Principal Component Analysis
title_fullStr Anatomical Variation of the Tibia – a Principal Component Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Anatomical Variation of the Tibia – a Principal Component Analysis
title_short Anatomical Variation of the Tibia – a Principal Component Analysis
title_sort anatomical variation of the tibia – a principal component analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6529455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31114000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44092-8
work_keys_str_mv AT quintensliselore anatomicalvariationofthetibiaaprincipalcomponentanalysis
AT herteleermichiel anatomicalvariationofthetibiaaprincipalcomponentanalysis
AT vancleefsanne anatomicalvariationofthetibiaaprincipalcomponentanalysis
AT caretteyannick anatomicalvariationofthetibiaaprincipalcomponentanalysis
AT dufloujoost anatomicalvariationofthetibiaaprincipalcomponentanalysis
AT nijsstefaan anatomicalvariationofthetibiaaprincipalcomponentanalysis
AT slotenjosvander anatomicalvariationofthetibiaaprincipalcomponentanalysis
AT hoekstraharm anatomicalvariationofthetibiaaprincipalcomponentanalysis