Cargando…

Urinary peptide panel for prognostic assessment of bladder cancer relapse

Non-invasive tools stratifying bladder cancer (BC) patients according to the risk of relapse are urgently needed to guide clinical intervention. As a follow-up to the previously published study on CE-MS-based urinary biomarkers for BC detection and recurrence monitoring, we expanded the investigatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krochmal, Magdalena, van Kessel, Kim E. M., Zwarthoff, Ellen C., Belczacka, Iwona, Pejchinovski, Martin, Vlahou, Antonia, Mischak, Harald, Frantzi, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6529475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31114012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44129-y
_version_ 1783420396150718464
author Krochmal, Magdalena
van Kessel, Kim E. M.
Zwarthoff, Ellen C.
Belczacka, Iwona
Pejchinovski, Martin
Vlahou, Antonia
Mischak, Harald
Frantzi, Maria
author_facet Krochmal, Magdalena
van Kessel, Kim E. M.
Zwarthoff, Ellen C.
Belczacka, Iwona
Pejchinovski, Martin
Vlahou, Antonia
Mischak, Harald
Frantzi, Maria
author_sort Krochmal, Magdalena
collection PubMed
description Non-invasive tools stratifying bladder cancer (BC) patients according to the risk of relapse are urgently needed to guide clinical intervention. As a follow-up to the previously published study on CE-MS-based urinary biomarkers for BC detection and recurrence monitoring, we expanded the investigation towards BC patients with longitudinal data. Profiling datasets of BC patients with follow-up information regarding the relapse status were investigated. The peptidomics dataset (n = 98) was split into training and test set. Cox regression was utilized for feature selection in the training set. Investigation of the entire training set at the single peptide level revealed 36 peptides being strong independent prognostic markers of disease relapse. Those features were further integrated into a Random Forest-based model evaluating the risk of relapse for BC patients. Performance of the model was assessed in the test cohort, showing high significance in BC relapse prognosis [HR = 5.76, p-value = 0.0001, c-index = 0.64]. Urinary peptide profiles integrated into a prognostic model allow for quantitative risk assessment of BC relapse highlighting the need for its incorporation in prospective studies to establish its value in the clinical management of BC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6529475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65294752019-05-30 Urinary peptide panel for prognostic assessment of bladder cancer relapse Krochmal, Magdalena van Kessel, Kim E. M. Zwarthoff, Ellen C. Belczacka, Iwona Pejchinovski, Martin Vlahou, Antonia Mischak, Harald Frantzi, Maria Sci Rep Article Non-invasive tools stratifying bladder cancer (BC) patients according to the risk of relapse are urgently needed to guide clinical intervention. As a follow-up to the previously published study on CE-MS-based urinary biomarkers for BC detection and recurrence monitoring, we expanded the investigation towards BC patients with longitudinal data. Profiling datasets of BC patients with follow-up information regarding the relapse status were investigated. The peptidomics dataset (n = 98) was split into training and test set. Cox regression was utilized for feature selection in the training set. Investigation of the entire training set at the single peptide level revealed 36 peptides being strong independent prognostic markers of disease relapse. Those features were further integrated into a Random Forest-based model evaluating the risk of relapse for BC patients. Performance of the model was assessed in the test cohort, showing high significance in BC relapse prognosis [HR = 5.76, p-value = 0.0001, c-index = 0.64]. Urinary peptide profiles integrated into a prognostic model allow for quantitative risk assessment of BC relapse highlighting the need for its incorporation in prospective studies to establish its value in the clinical management of BC. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6529475/ /pubmed/31114012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44129-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Krochmal, Magdalena
van Kessel, Kim E. M.
Zwarthoff, Ellen C.
Belczacka, Iwona
Pejchinovski, Martin
Vlahou, Antonia
Mischak, Harald
Frantzi, Maria
Urinary peptide panel for prognostic assessment of bladder cancer relapse
title Urinary peptide panel for prognostic assessment of bladder cancer relapse
title_full Urinary peptide panel for prognostic assessment of bladder cancer relapse
title_fullStr Urinary peptide panel for prognostic assessment of bladder cancer relapse
title_full_unstemmed Urinary peptide panel for prognostic assessment of bladder cancer relapse
title_short Urinary peptide panel for prognostic assessment of bladder cancer relapse
title_sort urinary peptide panel for prognostic assessment of bladder cancer relapse
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6529475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31114012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44129-y
work_keys_str_mv AT krochmalmagdalena urinarypeptidepanelforprognosticassessmentofbladdercancerrelapse
AT vankesselkimem urinarypeptidepanelforprognosticassessmentofbladdercancerrelapse
AT zwarthoffellenc urinarypeptidepanelforprognosticassessmentofbladdercancerrelapse
AT belczackaiwona urinarypeptidepanelforprognosticassessmentofbladdercancerrelapse
AT pejchinovskimartin urinarypeptidepanelforprognosticassessmentofbladdercancerrelapse
AT vlahouantonia urinarypeptidepanelforprognosticassessmentofbladdercancerrelapse
AT mischakharald urinarypeptidepanelforprognosticassessmentofbladdercancerrelapse
AT frantzimaria urinarypeptidepanelforprognosticassessmentofbladdercancerrelapse