Cargando…

State of affairs of hybrid imaging in Europe: two multi-national surveys from 2017

OBJECTIVES: To assess the current state of hybrid imaging in Europe with respect to operations, reading and reporting, as well as qualification and training. METHODS: The first survey (LOCAL) was sent to the heads of the departments of radiology and nuclear medicine in Europe in 2017, including 15 q...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gatidis, Sergios, Beyer, Thomas, Becker, Minerva, Riklund, Katrine, Nikolaou, Konstantin, Cyran, Clemens, Pfannenberg, Christina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6529476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31115706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0741-7
_version_ 1783420396456902656
author Gatidis, Sergios
Beyer, Thomas
Becker, Minerva
Riklund, Katrine
Nikolaou, Konstantin
Cyran, Clemens
Pfannenberg, Christina
author_facet Gatidis, Sergios
Beyer, Thomas
Becker, Minerva
Riklund, Katrine
Nikolaou, Konstantin
Cyran, Clemens
Pfannenberg, Christina
author_sort Gatidis, Sergios
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the current state of hybrid imaging in Europe with respect to operations, reading and reporting, as well as qualification and training. METHODS: The first survey (LOCAL) was sent to the heads of the departments of radiology and nuclear medicine in Europe in 2017, including 15 questions regarding the organisation of hybrid imaging operations, reporting strategies for PET/CT and the existence of relevant training programmes. The second survey (NATIONAL) consisted of 10 questions and was directed to the national ministries of health of 37 European countries addressing combined training options in radiology and nuclear medicine. RESULTS: In the LOCAL survey, 61 valid responses from 26 European countries were received. In almost half of the institutions, hybrid imaging was performed within a single department, mainly in nuclear medicine departments (31%). In half of the centres (51%), PET/CT reports were performed jointly, while in 20% of the centres, reporting was performed by nuclear medicine physicians. Radiologists were responsible for presenting hybrid imaging results in clinical boards in 34% of responding sites. Integrated hybrid imaging training was available in 41% sites. In the NATIONAL survey, responses from 34 countries were received and demonstrated a heterogeneous landscape of official training possibilities in radiology and nuclear medicine with limited opportunities for additional qualifications in hybrid imaging. CONCLUSIONS: The results of these surveys demonstrate a notable heterogeneity in the current practice of hybrid imaging throughout Europe. This heterogeneity exists despite the general consensus that strong professional cooperation is required in order to ensure high clinical quality and to strengthen the clinical role of hybrid imaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6529476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65294762019-05-28 State of affairs of hybrid imaging in Europe: two multi-national surveys from 2017 Gatidis, Sergios Beyer, Thomas Becker, Minerva Riklund, Katrine Nikolaou, Konstantin Cyran, Clemens Pfannenberg, Christina Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: To assess the current state of hybrid imaging in Europe with respect to operations, reading and reporting, as well as qualification and training. METHODS: The first survey (LOCAL) was sent to the heads of the departments of radiology and nuclear medicine in Europe in 2017, including 15 questions regarding the organisation of hybrid imaging operations, reporting strategies for PET/CT and the existence of relevant training programmes. The second survey (NATIONAL) consisted of 10 questions and was directed to the national ministries of health of 37 European countries addressing combined training options in radiology and nuclear medicine. RESULTS: In the LOCAL survey, 61 valid responses from 26 European countries were received. In almost half of the institutions, hybrid imaging was performed within a single department, mainly in nuclear medicine departments (31%). In half of the centres (51%), PET/CT reports were performed jointly, while in 20% of the centres, reporting was performed by nuclear medicine physicians. Radiologists were responsible for presenting hybrid imaging results in clinical boards in 34% of responding sites. Integrated hybrid imaging training was available in 41% sites. In the NATIONAL survey, responses from 34 countries were received and demonstrated a heterogeneous landscape of official training possibilities in radiology and nuclear medicine with limited opportunities for additional qualifications in hybrid imaging. CONCLUSIONS: The results of these surveys demonstrate a notable heterogeneity in the current practice of hybrid imaging throughout Europe. This heterogeneity exists despite the general consensus that strong professional cooperation is required in order to ensure high clinical quality and to strengthen the clinical role of hybrid imaging. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6529476/ /pubmed/31115706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0741-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gatidis, Sergios
Beyer, Thomas
Becker, Minerva
Riklund, Katrine
Nikolaou, Konstantin
Cyran, Clemens
Pfannenberg, Christina
State of affairs of hybrid imaging in Europe: two multi-national surveys from 2017
title State of affairs of hybrid imaging in Europe: two multi-national surveys from 2017
title_full State of affairs of hybrid imaging in Europe: two multi-national surveys from 2017
title_fullStr State of affairs of hybrid imaging in Europe: two multi-national surveys from 2017
title_full_unstemmed State of affairs of hybrid imaging in Europe: two multi-national surveys from 2017
title_short State of affairs of hybrid imaging in Europe: two multi-national surveys from 2017
title_sort state of affairs of hybrid imaging in europe: two multi-national surveys from 2017
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6529476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31115706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0741-7
work_keys_str_mv AT gatidissergios stateofaffairsofhybridimagingineuropetwomultinationalsurveysfrom2017
AT beyerthomas stateofaffairsofhybridimagingineuropetwomultinationalsurveysfrom2017
AT beckerminerva stateofaffairsofhybridimagingineuropetwomultinationalsurveysfrom2017
AT riklundkatrine stateofaffairsofhybridimagingineuropetwomultinationalsurveysfrom2017
AT nikolaoukonstantin stateofaffairsofhybridimagingineuropetwomultinationalsurveysfrom2017
AT cyranclemens stateofaffairsofhybridimagingineuropetwomultinationalsurveysfrom2017
AT pfannenbergchristina stateofaffairsofhybridimagingineuropetwomultinationalsurveysfrom2017