Cargando…
Microbubbles as a contrast agent in grating interferometry mammography: an ex vivo proof-of-mechanism study
Grating interferometry mammography (GIM) is an experimental breast imaging method at the edge of being clinically implemented. Besides attenuation, GIM can measure the refraction and scattering of x-rays resulting in differential phase contrast (DPC) and dark-field (DF) images. In this exploratory s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6529489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31115796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-019-0097-2 |
_version_ | 1783420399504064512 |
---|---|
author | Lång, Kristina Arboleda, Carolina Forte, Serafino Wang, Zhentian Prevrhal, Sven Koehler, Thomas Kuhn, Norbert David, Bernd Jefimovs, Konstantins Kubik-Huch, Rahel A. Stampanoni, Marco |
author_facet | Lång, Kristina Arboleda, Carolina Forte, Serafino Wang, Zhentian Prevrhal, Sven Koehler, Thomas Kuhn, Norbert David, Bernd Jefimovs, Konstantins Kubik-Huch, Rahel A. Stampanoni, Marco |
author_sort | Lång, Kristina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Grating interferometry mammography (GIM) is an experimental breast imaging method at the edge of being clinically implemented. Besides attenuation, GIM can measure the refraction and scattering of x-rays resulting in differential phase contrast (DPC) and dark-field (DF) images. In this exploratory study, we assessed the feasibility of using microbubbles as a contrast agent in GIM. Two millilitres of microbubbles and iodine were respectively injected into ex vivo breast phantoms, consisting of fresh chicken breasts. Native and postcontrast images were acquired with a clinically compatible GIM setup, operated at 38 kVp, 14-s acquisition time, and with a dose of 1.3 mGy. The visibility of the contrast agents was analysed in a side-by-side comparison by three radiologists. The contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) was calculated for each contrast agent. We found that both contrast agents were judged to be visible by the readers. The mean CNR was 3.1 ± 1.9 for microbubbles in DF and 24.2 ± 6.5 for iodine in attenuation. In conclusion, this is a first proof-of-mechanism study that microbubbles could be used as a contrast agent in clinically compatible GIM, due to their scattering properties, which implies the potential use of a contrast agent with a high safety profile in x-ray-based breast imaging. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6529489 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65294892019-06-07 Microbubbles as a contrast agent in grating interferometry mammography: an ex vivo proof-of-mechanism study Lång, Kristina Arboleda, Carolina Forte, Serafino Wang, Zhentian Prevrhal, Sven Koehler, Thomas Kuhn, Norbert David, Bernd Jefimovs, Konstantins Kubik-Huch, Rahel A. Stampanoni, Marco Eur Radiol Exp Technical Note Grating interferometry mammography (GIM) is an experimental breast imaging method at the edge of being clinically implemented. Besides attenuation, GIM can measure the refraction and scattering of x-rays resulting in differential phase contrast (DPC) and dark-field (DF) images. In this exploratory study, we assessed the feasibility of using microbubbles as a contrast agent in GIM. Two millilitres of microbubbles and iodine were respectively injected into ex vivo breast phantoms, consisting of fresh chicken breasts. Native and postcontrast images were acquired with a clinically compatible GIM setup, operated at 38 kVp, 14-s acquisition time, and with a dose of 1.3 mGy. The visibility of the contrast agents was analysed in a side-by-side comparison by three radiologists. The contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) was calculated for each contrast agent. We found that both contrast agents were judged to be visible by the readers. The mean CNR was 3.1 ± 1.9 for microbubbles in DF and 24.2 ± 6.5 for iodine in attenuation. In conclusion, this is a first proof-of-mechanism study that microbubbles could be used as a contrast agent in clinically compatible GIM, due to their scattering properties, which implies the potential use of a contrast agent with a high safety profile in x-ray-based breast imaging. Springer International Publishing 2019-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6529489/ /pubmed/31115796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-019-0097-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Lång, Kristina Arboleda, Carolina Forte, Serafino Wang, Zhentian Prevrhal, Sven Koehler, Thomas Kuhn, Norbert David, Bernd Jefimovs, Konstantins Kubik-Huch, Rahel A. Stampanoni, Marco Microbubbles as a contrast agent in grating interferometry mammography: an ex vivo proof-of-mechanism study |
title | Microbubbles as a contrast agent in grating interferometry mammography: an ex vivo proof-of-mechanism study |
title_full | Microbubbles as a contrast agent in grating interferometry mammography: an ex vivo proof-of-mechanism study |
title_fullStr | Microbubbles as a contrast agent in grating interferometry mammography: an ex vivo proof-of-mechanism study |
title_full_unstemmed | Microbubbles as a contrast agent in grating interferometry mammography: an ex vivo proof-of-mechanism study |
title_short | Microbubbles as a contrast agent in grating interferometry mammography: an ex vivo proof-of-mechanism study |
title_sort | microbubbles as a contrast agent in grating interferometry mammography: an ex vivo proof-of-mechanism study |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6529489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31115796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-019-0097-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT langkristina microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy AT arboledacarolina microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy AT forteserafino microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy AT wangzhentian microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy AT prevrhalsven microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy AT koehlerthomas microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy AT kuhnnorbert microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy AT davidbernd microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy AT jefimovskonstantins microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy AT kubikhuchrahela microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy AT stampanonimarco microbubblesasacontrastagentingratinginterferometrymammographyanexvivoproofofmechanismstudy |