Cargando…
Acute Effects of the New Method Sarcoplasma Stimulating Training Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Total Training Volume, Lactate and Muscle Thickness
Background: Trained subjects have difficulty in achieving continued results following years of training, and the manipulation of training variables through advanced resistance training (RT) methods is widely recommended to break through plateaus. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6529514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156459 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00579 |
_version_ | 1783420404883259392 |
---|---|
author | de Almeida, Fernando Noronha Lopes, Charles Ricardo da Conceição, Raphael Machado Oenning, Luan Crisp, Alex Harley de Sousa, Nuno Manuel Frade Trindade, Thiago Barbosa Willardson, Jeffrey M. Prestes, Jonato |
author_facet | de Almeida, Fernando Noronha Lopes, Charles Ricardo da Conceição, Raphael Machado Oenning, Luan Crisp, Alex Harley de Sousa, Nuno Manuel Frade Trindade, Thiago Barbosa Willardson, Jeffrey M. Prestes, Jonato |
author_sort | de Almeida, Fernando Noronha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Trained subjects have difficulty in achieving continued results following years of training, and the manipulation of training variables through advanced resistance training (RT) methods is widely recommended to break through plateaus. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the acute effects of traditional RT (TRT) versus two types of sarcoplasma stimulating training (SST) methods on total training volume (TTV), lactate, and muscle thickness (MT). Methods: Twelve trained males (20.75 ± 2.3 years; 1.76 ± 0.14 meters; body mass = 79.41 ± 4.6 kg; RT experience = 4.1 ± 1.8 years) completed three RT protocols in a randomly sequenced order: TRT, SST contraction type (SST-CT), or SST rest interval variable (SST-RIV) with 7 days between trials in arm curl (elbow flexors) and triceps pulley extension (elbow extensors) performed on the same day. Results: The SST groups displayed greater acute biceps and triceps brachii (TB) MT versus the TRT session, with no difference in lactate levels between them. The SST-CT resulted in greater biceps and TB MT versus the SST-RIV session. The TTV was greater for the TRT session versus the SST sessions, except in the case of the elbow flexors (no difference was observed between TRT and SST-CT), and higher for the SST-CT versus the SST-RIV. Conclusion: Trained subjects may benefit from using the SST method as this method may offer a superior MT stimulus and reduced training time, even with a lower TTV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6529514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65295142019-05-31 Acute Effects of the New Method Sarcoplasma Stimulating Training Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Total Training Volume, Lactate and Muscle Thickness de Almeida, Fernando Noronha Lopes, Charles Ricardo da Conceição, Raphael Machado Oenning, Luan Crisp, Alex Harley de Sousa, Nuno Manuel Frade Trindade, Thiago Barbosa Willardson, Jeffrey M. Prestes, Jonato Front Physiol Physiology Background: Trained subjects have difficulty in achieving continued results following years of training, and the manipulation of training variables through advanced resistance training (RT) methods is widely recommended to break through plateaus. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the acute effects of traditional RT (TRT) versus two types of sarcoplasma stimulating training (SST) methods on total training volume (TTV), lactate, and muscle thickness (MT). Methods: Twelve trained males (20.75 ± 2.3 years; 1.76 ± 0.14 meters; body mass = 79.41 ± 4.6 kg; RT experience = 4.1 ± 1.8 years) completed three RT protocols in a randomly sequenced order: TRT, SST contraction type (SST-CT), or SST rest interval variable (SST-RIV) with 7 days between trials in arm curl (elbow flexors) and triceps pulley extension (elbow extensors) performed on the same day. Results: The SST groups displayed greater acute biceps and triceps brachii (TB) MT versus the TRT session, with no difference in lactate levels between them. The SST-CT resulted in greater biceps and TB MT versus the SST-RIV session. The TTV was greater for the TRT session versus the SST sessions, except in the case of the elbow flexors (no difference was observed between TRT and SST-CT), and higher for the SST-CT versus the SST-RIV. Conclusion: Trained subjects may benefit from using the SST method as this method may offer a superior MT stimulus and reduced training time, even with a lower TTV. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6529514/ /pubmed/31156459 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00579 Text en Copyright © 2019 de Almeida, Lopes, Conceição, Oenning, Crisp, de Sousa, Trindade, Willardson and Prestes. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology de Almeida, Fernando Noronha Lopes, Charles Ricardo da Conceição, Raphael Machado Oenning, Luan Crisp, Alex Harley de Sousa, Nuno Manuel Frade Trindade, Thiago Barbosa Willardson, Jeffrey M. Prestes, Jonato Acute Effects of the New Method Sarcoplasma Stimulating Training Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Total Training Volume, Lactate and Muscle Thickness |
title | Acute Effects of the New Method Sarcoplasma Stimulating Training Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Total Training Volume, Lactate and Muscle Thickness |
title_full | Acute Effects of the New Method Sarcoplasma Stimulating Training Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Total Training Volume, Lactate and Muscle Thickness |
title_fullStr | Acute Effects of the New Method Sarcoplasma Stimulating Training Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Total Training Volume, Lactate and Muscle Thickness |
title_full_unstemmed | Acute Effects of the New Method Sarcoplasma Stimulating Training Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Total Training Volume, Lactate and Muscle Thickness |
title_short | Acute Effects of the New Method Sarcoplasma Stimulating Training Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Total Training Volume, Lactate and Muscle Thickness |
title_sort | acute effects of the new method sarcoplasma stimulating training versus traditional resistance training on total training volume, lactate and muscle thickness |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6529514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156459 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00579 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dealmeidafernandonoronha acuteeffectsofthenewmethodsarcoplasmastimulatingtrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingontotaltrainingvolumelactateandmusclethickness AT lopescharlesricardo acuteeffectsofthenewmethodsarcoplasmastimulatingtrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingontotaltrainingvolumelactateandmusclethickness AT daconceicaoraphaelmachado acuteeffectsofthenewmethodsarcoplasmastimulatingtrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingontotaltrainingvolumelactateandmusclethickness AT oenningluan acuteeffectsofthenewmethodsarcoplasmastimulatingtrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingontotaltrainingvolumelactateandmusclethickness AT crispalexharley acuteeffectsofthenewmethodsarcoplasmastimulatingtrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingontotaltrainingvolumelactateandmusclethickness AT desousanunomanuelfrade acuteeffectsofthenewmethodsarcoplasmastimulatingtrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingontotaltrainingvolumelactateandmusclethickness AT trindadethiagobarbosa acuteeffectsofthenewmethodsarcoplasmastimulatingtrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingontotaltrainingvolumelactateandmusclethickness AT willardsonjeffreym acuteeffectsofthenewmethodsarcoplasmastimulatingtrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingontotaltrainingvolumelactateandmusclethickness AT prestesjonato acuteeffectsofthenewmethodsarcoplasmastimulatingtrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingontotaltrainingvolumelactateandmusclethickness |