Cargando…

Acute Effects of the New Method Sarcoplasma Stimulating Training Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Total Training Volume, Lactate and Muscle Thickness

Background: Trained subjects have difficulty in achieving continued results following years of training, and the manipulation of training variables through advanced resistance training (RT) methods is widely recommended to break through plateaus. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Almeida, Fernando Noronha, Lopes, Charles Ricardo, da Conceição, Raphael Machado, Oenning, Luan, Crisp, Alex Harley, de Sousa, Nuno Manuel Frade, Trindade, Thiago Barbosa, Willardson, Jeffrey M., Prestes, Jonato
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6529514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156459
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00579
_version_ 1783420404883259392
author de Almeida, Fernando Noronha
Lopes, Charles Ricardo
da Conceição, Raphael Machado
Oenning, Luan
Crisp, Alex Harley
de Sousa, Nuno Manuel Frade
Trindade, Thiago Barbosa
Willardson, Jeffrey M.
Prestes, Jonato
author_facet de Almeida, Fernando Noronha
Lopes, Charles Ricardo
da Conceição, Raphael Machado
Oenning, Luan
Crisp, Alex Harley
de Sousa, Nuno Manuel Frade
Trindade, Thiago Barbosa
Willardson, Jeffrey M.
Prestes, Jonato
author_sort de Almeida, Fernando Noronha
collection PubMed
description Background: Trained subjects have difficulty in achieving continued results following years of training, and the manipulation of training variables through advanced resistance training (RT) methods is widely recommended to break through plateaus. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the acute effects of traditional RT (TRT) versus two types of sarcoplasma stimulating training (SST) methods on total training volume (TTV), lactate, and muscle thickness (MT). Methods: Twelve trained males (20.75 ± 2.3 years; 1.76 ± 0.14 meters; body mass = 79.41 ± 4.6 kg; RT experience = 4.1 ± 1.8 years) completed three RT protocols in a randomly sequenced order: TRT, SST contraction type (SST-CT), or SST rest interval variable (SST-RIV) with 7 days between trials in arm curl (elbow flexors) and triceps pulley extension (elbow extensors) performed on the same day. Results: The SST groups displayed greater acute biceps and triceps brachii (TB) MT versus the TRT session, with no difference in lactate levels between them. The SST-CT resulted in greater biceps and TB MT versus the SST-RIV session. The TTV was greater for the TRT session versus the SST sessions, except in the case of the elbow flexors (no difference was observed between TRT and SST-CT), and higher for the SST-CT versus the SST-RIV. Conclusion: Trained subjects may benefit from using the SST method as this method may offer a superior MT stimulus and reduced training time, even with a lower TTV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6529514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65295142019-05-31 Acute Effects of the New Method Sarcoplasma Stimulating Training Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Total Training Volume, Lactate and Muscle Thickness de Almeida, Fernando Noronha Lopes, Charles Ricardo da Conceição, Raphael Machado Oenning, Luan Crisp, Alex Harley de Sousa, Nuno Manuel Frade Trindade, Thiago Barbosa Willardson, Jeffrey M. Prestes, Jonato Front Physiol Physiology Background: Trained subjects have difficulty in achieving continued results following years of training, and the manipulation of training variables through advanced resistance training (RT) methods is widely recommended to break through plateaus. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the acute effects of traditional RT (TRT) versus two types of sarcoplasma stimulating training (SST) methods on total training volume (TTV), lactate, and muscle thickness (MT). Methods: Twelve trained males (20.75 ± 2.3 years; 1.76 ± 0.14 meters; body mass = 79.41 ± 4.6 kg; RT experience = 4.1 ± 1.8 years) completed three RT protocols in a randomly sequenced order: TRT, SST contraction type (SST-CT), or SST rest interval variable (SST-RIV) with 7 days between trials in arm curl (elbow flexors) and triceps pulley extension (elbow extensors) performed on the same day. Results: The SST groups displayed greater acute biceps and triceps brachii (TB) MT versus the TRT session, with no difference in lactate levels between them. The SST-CT resulted in greater biceps and TB MT versus the SST-RIV session. The TTV was greater for the TRT session versus the SST sessions, except in the case of the elbow flexors (no difference was observed between TRT and SST-CT), and higher for the SST-CT versus the SST-RIV. Conclusion: Trained subjects may benefit from using the SST method as this method may offer a superior MT stimulus and reduced training time, even with a lower TTV. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6529514/ /pubmed/31156459 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00579 Text en Copyright © 2019 de Almeida, Lopes, Conceição, Oenning, Crisp, de Sousa, Trindade, Willardson and Prestes. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
de Almeida, Fernando Noronha
Lopes, Charles Ricardo
da Conceição, Raphael Machado
Oenning, Luan
Crisp, Alex Harley
de Sousa, Nuno Manuel Frade
Trindade, Thiago Barbosa
Willardson, Jeffrey M.
Prestes, Jonato
Acute Effects of the New Method Sarcoplasma Stimulating Training Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Total Training Volume, Lactate and Muscle Thickness
title Acute Effects of the New Method Sarcoplasma Stimulating Training Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Total Training Volume, Lactate and Muscle Thickness
title_full Acute Effects of the New Method Sarcoplasma Stimulating Training Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Total Training Volume, Lactate and Muscle Thickness
title_fullStr Acute Effects of the New Method Sarcoplasma Stimulating Training Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Total Training Volume, Lactate and Muscle Thickness
title_full_unstemmed Acute Effects of the New Method Sarcoplasma Stimulating Training Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Total Training Volume, Lactate and Muscle Thickness
title_short Acute Effects of the New Method Sarcoplasma Stimulating Training Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Total Training Volume, Lactate and Muscle Thickness
title_sort acute effects of the new method sarcoplasma stimulating training versus traditional resistance training on total training volume, lactate and muscle thickness
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6529514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156459
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00579
work_keys_str_mv AT dealmeidafernandonoronha acuteeffectsofthenewmethodsarcoplasmastimulatingtrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingontotaltrainingvolumelactateandmusclethickness
AT lopescharlesricardo acuteeffectsofthenewmethodsarcoplasmastimulatingtrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingontotaltrainingvolumelactateandmusclethickness
AT daconceicaoraphaelmachado acuteeffectsofthenewmethodsarcoplasmastimulatingtrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingontotaltrainingvolumelactateandmusclethickness
AT oenningluan acuteeffectsofthenewmethodsarcoplasmastimulatingtrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingontotaltrainingvolumelactateandmusclethickness
AT crispalexharley acuteeffectsofthenewmethodsarcoplasmastimulatingtrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingontotaltrainingvolumelactateandmusclethickness
AT desousanunomanuelfrade acuteeffectsofthenewmethodsarcoplasmastimulatingtrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingontotaltrainingvolumelactateandmusclethickness
AT trindadethiagobarbosa acuteeffectsofthenewmethodsarcoplasmastimulatingtrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingontotaltrainingvolumelactateandmusclethickness
AT willardsonjeffreym acuteeffectsofthenewmethodsarcoplasmastimulatingtrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingontotaltrainingvolumelactateandmusclethickness
AT prestesjonato acuteeffectsofthenewmethodsarcoplasmastimulatingtrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingontotaltrainingvolumelactateandmusclethickness