Cargando…
Evaluation of mandibular calcification on 3D volume images
OBJECTIVES: Bone and soft-tissue calcifications are often coincidentally diagnosed on digital panoramic radiographs (DPRs). As the use of three-dimensional (3D) images has increased in the past decade for diagnostics in the mandibular region, we evaluated 3D volume images derived from 2D panoramic i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6529742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31193452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01698 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVES: Bone and soft-tissue calcifications are often coincidentally diagnosed on digital panoramic radiographs (DPRs). As the use of three-dimensional (3D) images has increased in the past decade for diagnostics in the mandibular region, we evaluated 3D volume images derived from 2D panoramic images to determine if this method is suitable for early detection of calcifications in this region. METHODS: In this study, three investigators retrospectively and independently evaluated 822 DPRs. If one or more calcifications were present, the 3D volume image from that patient was retrospectively evaluated to confirm the incidental findings. A radiographic system with a low-dose mode and a high-resolution 3D-image function was used. The investigators focussed on the most common calcifications, including tonsilloliths (TL), idiopathic osteosclerosis (IO) of the mandible, carotid artery calcifications (CAC), calcified submandibular lymph nodes (hereafter, CSL), and sialoliths of the submandibular salivary gland (SSG). RESULTS: One or more calcifications were identified in 415 (50.5%) DPRs. In total, 718 calcifications were detected, 30.2% of which were TL, 16.3% IO, 11.3% CAC, 8.8% CSL, and 1.7% SSG. Only 287 (39.97 %) of the calcifications were confirmed on 3D volume images; of these, 29.2% were TL, 58.5% IO, 0.2% CAC, and 1.4% SSG. No CSLs were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Not all areas shown on the DPRs were visible in the retrospectively obtained 3D volume images. Whereas DPRs are used to diagnose calcifications such as IO, TL, SSG, CAC, and CSL, the 3D volume images were only useful for confirming the existence of IO, TL, and SSG calcifications. |
---|