Cargando…

Outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND: Lobectomy is the standard treatment for patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent studies have shown promising results of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in these patients. We retrospectively compared the outcomes of lobectomy and SBRT in these patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Qingren, Sun, Xiaojiang, Zhou, Ning, Wang, Zhun, Xu, Yaping, Wang, Yuezhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0858-y
_version_ 1783420561085431808
author Lin, Qingren
Sun, Xiaojiang
Zhou, Ning
Wang, Zhun
Xu, Yaping
Wang, Yuezhen
author_facet Lin, Qingren
Sun, Xiaojiang
Zhou, Ning
Wang, Zhun
Xu, Yaping
Wang, Yuezhen
author_sort Lin, Qingren
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lobectomy is the standard treatment for patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent studies have shown promising results of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in these patients. We retrospectively compared the outcomes of lobectomy and SBRT in these patients from our therapeutic center. METHODS: Patients who underwent lobectomy or SBRT for clinical T1–2a (T size≤5 cm), N0 M0, NSCLC between December 2011 and August 2016 were reviewed. Patient characteristics, treatment-related outcomes and toxicities were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to improve comparability between the two groups. RESULTS: Median follow-up period in the lobectomy (n = 246) and SBRT (n = 70) group was 31.4 months and 24.9 months, respectively. Three-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was comparable in the two groups (97% vs. 91.7%, respectively; P = 0.768). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 3-year in the lobectomy and SBRT groups was 85.4 and 69.5%, respectively (P = 0.014). Three-year overall survival (OS) after lobectomy and SBRT was 88.2 and 79.7%, respectively (P = 0.027), while 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 91.3 and 82.5% (P = 0.022). After PSM (45 matched patients in each group), there was no significant between-group difference with respect to 3-year LRFS (89.6% vs. 87.5%, P = 0.635), RFS (77.6% vs. 67.3%, P = 0.446), OS (78.5% vs. 79.5%, P = 0.915) or CSS (86.4 and 79.5%, P = 0.551). In matched subgroup, 30-day mortality after lobectomy was 2.2%, and no treatment-related death occurred after SBRT. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment-related outcomes of SBRT and lobectomy were comparable. SBRT was well tolerated and had a very low toxicity profile in our study. SBRT is a promising alternative treatment option for stage I NSCLC patients. This study indicates that matching these disparate cohorts of patients is challenging. Clinical trials are essential to define the indications and relative efficacy of lobectomy and SBRT in a selected population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6530131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65301312019-05-28 Outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis Lin, Qingren Sun, Xiaojiang Zhou, Ning Wang, Zhun Xu, Yaping Wang, Yuezhen BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Lobectomy is the standard treatment for patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent studies have shown promising results of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in these patients. We retrospectively compared the outcomes of lobectomy and SBRT in these patients from our therapeutic center. METHODS: Patients who underwent lobectomy or SBRT for clinical T1–2a (T size≤5 cm), N0 M0, NSCLC between December 2011 and August 2016 were reviewed. Patient characteristics, treatment-related outcomes and toxicities were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to improve comparability between the two groups. RESULTS: Median follow-up period in the lobectomy (n = 246) and SBRT (n = 70) group was 31.4 months and 24.9 months, respectively. Three-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was comparable in the two groups (97% vs. 91.7%, respectively; P = 0.768). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 3-year in the lobectomy and SBRT groups was 85.4 and 69.5%, respectively (P = 0.014). Three-year overall survival (OS) after lobectomy and SBRT was 88.2 and 79.7%, respectively (P = 0.027), while 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 91.3 and 82.5% (P = 0.022). After PSM (45 matched patients in each group), there was no significant between-group difference with respect to 3-year LRFS (89.6% vs. 87.5%, P = 0.635), RFS (77.6% vs. 67.3%, P = 0.446), OS (78.5% vs. 79.5%, P = 0.915) or CSS (86.4 and 79.5%, P = 0.551). In matched subgroup, 30-day mortality after lobectomy was 2.2%, and no treatment-related death occurred after SBRT. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment-related outcomes of SBRT and lobectomy were comparable. SBRT was well tolerated and had a very low toxicity profile in our study. SBRT is a promising alternative treatment option for stage I NSCLC patients. This study indicates that matching these disparate cohorts of patients is challenging. Clinical trials are essential to define the indications and relative efficacy of lobectomy and SBRT in a selected population. BioMed Central 2019-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6530131/ /pubmed/31118007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0858-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lin, Qingren
Sun, Xiaojiang
Zhou, Ning
Wang, Zhun
Xu, Yaping
Wang, Yuezhen
Outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
title Outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
title_full Outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
title_fullStr Outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
title_short Outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
title_sort outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy versus lobectomy for stage i non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0858-y
work_keys_str_mv AT linqingren outcomesofstereotacticbodyradiotherapyversuslobectomyforstageinonsmallcelllungcancerapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT sunxiaojiang outcomesofstereotacticbodyradiotherapyversuslobectomyforstageinonsmallcelllungcancerapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT zhouning outcomesofstereotacticbodyradiotherapyversuslobectomyforstageinonsmallcelllungcancerapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT wangzhun outcomesofstereotacticbodyradiotherapyversuslobectomyforstageinonsmallcelllungcancerapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT xuyaping outcomesofstereotacticbodyradiotherapyversuslobectomyforstageinonsmallcelllungcancerapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT wangyuezhen outcomesofstereotacticbodyradiotherapyversuslobectomyforstageinonsmallcelllungcancerapropensityscorematchinganalysis