Cargando…

Hemi-diaphragmatic paresis following extrafascial versus conventional intrafascial approach for interscalene brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomised, controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hemidiaphragmatic paresis occurs in almost all patients undergoing interscalene block for proximal upper limb surgeries. This study tested hypothesis that ultrasound-guided extrafascial approach of interscalene block under nerve stimulator guidance reduces incidence of hemidiaph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ayyanagouda, Basavaraja, Hosalli, Vinod, Kaur, Prableen, Ambi, Uday, Hulkund, SY
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31142881
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_69_19
_version_ 1783420606458363904
author Ayyanagouda, Basavaraja
Hosalli, Vinod
Kaur, Prableen
Ambi, Uday
Hulkund, SY
author_facet Ayyanagouda, Basavaraja
Hosalli, Vinod
Kaur, Prableen
Ambi, Uday
Hulkund, SY
author_sort Ayyanagouda, Basavaraja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hemidiaphragmatic paresis occurs in almost all patients undergoing interscalene block for proximal upper limb surgeries. This study tested hypothesis that ultrasound-guided extrafascial approach of interscalene block under nerve stimulator guidance reduces incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis in comparison to intrafascial approach by achieving same degree of anaesthesia and analgesia. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing proximal upper limb surgeries were randomised to receive an ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) with the aid of nerve stimulator for surgical anaesthesia and analgesia using 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine by extrafascial (Group E) or intrafascial (Group I) approach. The incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis was measured by M-mode ultrasound before and 30 min after the procedure. Secondary outcomes such as respiratory functions (forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s and peak expiratory flow rate) were measured, and complications were recorded and compared. The statistics was obtained using SPSS Version 19. Levene's test and paired and unpaired t-test were used. P value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis was 17% and 46% in Group E and Group I, respectively (P < 0.0001). All other respiratory outcomes were preserved in Group E compared with Group I. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided ISB with the aid of nerve stimulator through extrafascial approach reduces the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis and also reduces respiratory function impairment when compared with intrafascial approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6530291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65302912019-05-29 Hemi-diaphragmatic paresis following extrafascial versus conventional intrafascial approach for interscalene brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomised, controlled trial Ayyanagouda, Basavaraja Hosalli, Vinod Kaur, Prableen Ambi, Uday Hulkund, SY Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hemidiaphragmatic paresis occurs in almost all patients undergoing interscalene block for proximal upper limb surgeries. This study tested hypothesis that ultrasound-guided extrafascial approach of interscalene block under nerve stimulator guidance reduces incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis in comparison to intrafascial approach by achieving same degree of anaesthesia and analgesia. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing proximal upper limb surgeries were randomised to receive an ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) with the aid of nerve stimulator for surgical anaesthesia and analgesia using 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine by extrafascial (Group E) or intrafascial (Group I) approach. The incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis was measured by M-mode ultrasound before and 30 min after the procedure. Secondary outcomes such as respiratory functions (forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s and peak expiratory flow rate) were measured, and complications were recorded and compared. The statistics was obtained using SPSS Version 19. Levene's test and paired and unpaired t-test were used. P value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis was 17% and 46% in Group E and Group I, respectively (P < 0.0001). All other respiratory outcomes were preserved in Group E compared with Group I. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided ISB with the aid of nerve stimulator through extrafascial approach reduces the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis and also reduces respiratory function impairment when compared with intrafascial approach. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6530291/ /pubmed/31142881 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_69_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ayyanagouda, Basavaraja
Hosalli, Vinod
Kaur, Prableen
Ambi, Uday
Hulkund, SY
Hemi-diaphragmatic paresis following extrafascial versus conventional intrafascial approach for interscalene brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomised, controlled trial
title Hemi-diaphragmatic paresis following extrafascial versus conventional intrafascial approach for interscalene brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomised, controlled trial
title_full Hemi-diaphragmatic paresis following extrafascial versus conventional intrafascial approach for interscalene brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomised, controlled trial
title_fullStr Hemi-diaphragmatic paresis following extrafascial versus conventional intrafascial approach for interscalene brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomised, controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Hemi-diaphragmatic paresis following extrafascial versus conventional intrafascial approach for interscalene brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomised, controlled trial
title_short Hemi-diaphragmatic paresis following extrafascial versus conventional intrafascial approach for interscalene brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomised, controlled trial
title_sort hemi-diaphragmatic paresis following extrafascial versus conventional intrafascial approach for interscalene brachial plexus block: a double-blind randomised, controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31142881
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_69_19
work_keys_str_mv AT ayyanagoudabasavaraja hemidiaphragmaticparesisfollowingextrafascialversusconventionalintrafascialapproachforinterscalenebrachialplexusblockadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hosallivinod hemidiaphragmaticparesisfollowingextrafascialversusconventionalintrafascialapproachforinterscalenebrachialplexusblockadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kaurprableen hemidiaphragmaticparesisfollowingextrafascialversusconventionalintrafascialapproachforinterscalenebrachialplexusblockadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ambiuday hemidiaphragmaticparesisfollowingextrafascialversusconventionalintrafascialapproachforinterscalenebrachialplexusblockadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hulkundsy hemidiaphragmaticparesisfollowingextrafascialversusconventionalintrafascialapproachforinterscalenebrachialplexusblockadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial