Cargando…

Systematic client feedback to brief therapy in basic mental healthcare: study protocol for a four-centre clinical trial

INTRODUCTION: The Partners for Change Outcome Management System (PCOMS) is a client feedback-system built on two brief visual analogue self-report scales. Prior studies of PCOMS have found effects varying from significant positive to negative. Aims of present study are; to test the predicted benefic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bovendeerd, Bram, de Jong, Kim, Colijn, Sjoerd, de Groot, Erik, Hafkenscheid, Anton, Moerbeek, Mirjam, de Keijser, Jos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31092647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025701
_version_ 1783420609172078592
author Bovendeerd, Bram
de Jong, Kim
Colijn, Sjoerd
de Groot, Erik
Hafkenscheid, Anton
Moerbeek, Mirjam
de Keijser, Jos
author_facet Bovendeerd, Bram
de Jong, Kim
Colijn, Sjoerd
de Groot, Erik
Hafkenscheid, Anton
Moerbeek, Mirjam
de Keijser, Jos
author_sort Bovendeerd, Bram
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Partners for Change Outcome Management System (PCOMS) is a client feedback-system built on two brief visual analogue self-report scales. Prior studies of PCOMS have found effects varying from significant positive to negative. Aims of present study are; to test the predicted beneficial impact of PCOMS, while accounting for methodological flaws in prior studies and to clarify under which circumstances the addition of PCOMS to therapy has a beneficial effect. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study focuses on patients applying for brief, time-limited treatments. Four centres will be randomised to either treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU with PCOMS. All participating patients will be assessed four times. The full staff in the experimental condition will be trained in PCOMS. In the second part of this study, all therapists in the PCOMS condition will fill in a questionnaire concerning the influence of regulatory focus, self-efficacy, external or internal feedback orientation and perceived feedback validity of PCOMS. Finally, patients in the PCOMS condition will be asked to give feedback through a structured interview. The primary outcome measure is the Outcome Questionnaire over the period from beginning to end of therapy. The Mental Health Continuum-Short Form and Consumer Quality Index are also completed. In the primary analysis, outcomes of the two treatment conditions on treatment outcome, patient satisfaction, costs, drop-out and duration will be examined with a three-level (within patient, between patients and between therapists) multilevel analysis. The DSM-classification, sex, education level, age of each patient and therapist factors will be included as covariates. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Medical Ethics Committee of the University of Twente approved this study (K15-11, METC Twente). Data will be included from 1 January 2016 to 1 July 2019. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR5466; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6530302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65303022019-06-07 Systematic client feedback to brief therapy in basic mental healthcare: study protocol for a four-centre clinical trial Bovendeerd, Bram de Jong, Kim Colijn, Sjoerd de Groot, Erik Hafkenscheid, Anton Moerbeek, Mirjam de Keijser, Jos BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: The Partners for Change Outcome Management System (PCOMS) is a client feedback-system built on two brief visual analogue self-report scales. Prior studies of PCOMS have found effects varying from significant positive to negative. Aims of present study are; to test the predicted beneficial impact of PCOMS, while accounting for methodological flaws in prior studies and to clarify under which circumstances the addition of PCOMS to therapy has a beneficial effect. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study focuses on patients applying for brief, time-limited treatments. Four centres will be randomised to either treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU with PCOMS. All participating patients will be assessed four times. The full staff in the experimental condition will be trained in PCOMS. In the second part of this study, all therapists in the PCOMS condition will fill in a questionnaire concerning the influence of regulatory focus, self-efficacy, external or internal feedback orientation and perceived feedback validity of PCOMS. Finally, patients in the PCOMS condition will be asked to give feedback through a structured interview. The primary outcome measure is the Outcome Questionnaire over the period from beginning to end of therapy. The Mental Health Continuum-Short Form and Consumer Quality Index are also completed. In the primary analysis, outcomes of the two treatment conditions on treatment outcome, patient satisfaction, costs, drop-out and duration will be examined with a three-level (within patient, between patients and between therapists) multilevel analysis. The DSM-classification, sex, education level, age of each patient and therapist factors will be included as covariates. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Medical Ethics Committee of the University of Twente approved this study (K15-11, METC Twente). Data will be included from 1 January 2016 to 1 July 2019. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR5466; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6530302/ /pubmed/31092647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025701 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Mental Health
Bovendeerd, Bram
de Jong, Kim
Colijn, Sjoerd
de Groot, Erik
Hafkenscheid, Anton
Moerbeek, Mirjam
de Keijser, Jos
Systematic client feedback to brief therapy in basic mental healthcare: study protocol for a four-centre clinical trial
title Systematic client feedback to brief therapy in basic mental healthcare: study protocol for a four-centre clinical trial
title_full Systematic client feedback to brief therapy in basic mental healthcare: study protocol for a four-centre clinical trial
title_fullStr Systematic client feedback to brief therapy in basic mental healthcare: study protocol for a four-centre clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Systematic client feedback to brief therapy in basic mental healthcare: study protocol for a four-centre clinical trial
title_short Systematic client feedback to brief therapy in basic mental healthcare: study protocol for a four-centre clinical trial
title_sort systematic client feedback to brief therapy in basic mental healthcare: study protocol for a four-centre clinical trial
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31092647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025701
work_keys_str_mv AT bovendeerdbram systematicclientfeedbacktobrieftherapyinbasicmentalhealthcarestudyprotocolforafourcentreclinicaltrial
AT dejongkim systematicclientfeedbacktobrieftherapyinbasicmentalhealthcarestudyprotocolforafourcentreclinicaltrial
AT colijnsjoerd systematicclientfeedbacktobrieftherapyinbasicmentalhealthcarestudyprotocolforafourcentreclinicaltrial
AT degrooterik systematicclientfeedbacktobrieftherapyinbasicmentalhealthcarestudyprotocolforafourcentreclinicaltrial
AT hafkenscheidanton systematicclientfeedbacktobrieftherapyinbasicmentalhealthcarestudyprotocolforafourcentreclinicaltrial
AT moerbeekmirjam systematicclientfeedbacktobrieftherapyinbasicmentalhealthcarestudyprotocolforafourcentreclinicaltrial
AT dekeijserjos systematicclientfeedbacktobrieftherapyinbasicmentalhealthcarestudyprotocolforafourcentreclinicaltrial