Cargando…

Perceptions about the implementation of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia: a national survey of Australian physiotherapists

OBJECTIVES: To explore: (1) the views of Australian physiotherapists regarding potential implementation of non-medical prescribing in Australia, (2) how the geographical location and health sector in which a clinician works may influence their perceptions and (3) the perceptions of Australian physio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noblet, Timothy David, Marriott, John F, Jones, Taryn, Dean, Catherine, Rushton, Alison B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31110086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024991
_version_ 1783420610303492096
author Noblet, Timothy David
Marriott, John F
Jones, Taryn
Dean, Catherine
Rushton, Alison B
author_facet Noblet, Timothy David
Marriott, John F
Jones, Taryn
Dean, Catherine
Rushton, Alison B
author_sort Noblet, Timothy David
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To explore: (1) the views of Australian physiotherapists regarding potential implementation of non-medical prescribing in Australia, (2) how the geographical location and health sector in which a clinician works may influence their perceptions and (3) the perceptions of Australian physiotherapists about how physiotherapist prescribing might impact the care that the profession can provide. DESIGN: A cross-sectional descriptive survey using open and closed questions. SETTING: Participants completed an online questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: 883 Australian Health Professionals Registration Authority (AHPRA)-registered physiotherapists, working across all states and territories. OUTCOME MEASURES: An online questionnaire was developed by a panel of subject experts and pretested (n=10) for internal consistency. A hyperlink to the questionnaire was emailed to all members of the Australian Physiotherapy Association. A reminder email was sent 4 weeks later. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, with use of absolute risk reductions (ARRs) and 95% CIs to determine the likelihood that health sector or geographical location were associated with specific views. Thematic analysis enabled synthesis of the qualitative data. RESULTS: 79.0% participants felt that physiotherapist prescribing should be introduced in Australia, with 71.2% wanting to train as prescribers. Clinical governance, risk management, regulation of clinicians and the development of an education framework were identified as priorities for implementation. Participants working in the private sector were significantly more likely to train as prescribers than those in the public sector (ARR 9.9%; 95% CI 3.5 to 16.4) or educational/research institutions (ARR 23.3%; 95% CI 12.8 to 33.8), with city dwellers significantly more likely to train compared with physiotherapists in remote regions (ARR 19.8%; 95% CI 0.8 to 39.2). Physiotherapist prescribing was predicted to improve efficiency of healthcare delivery, access to medicines and reductions in healthcare costs. CONCLUSIONS: AHPRA-registered physiotherapists perceive that the introduction of autonomous physiotherapist prescribing would be beneficial for the Australian population and should be introduced. Decision makers should consider the results of this survey in conjunction with cost–benefit and risk analysis when planning the introduction of physiotherapist prescribing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6530306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65303062019-06-07 Perceptions about the implementation of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia: a national survey of Australian physiotherapists Noblet, Timothy David Marriott, John F Jones, Taryn Dean, Catherine Rushton, Alison B BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To explore: (1) the views of Australian physiotherapists regarding potential implementation of non-medical prescribing in Australia, (2) how the geographical location and health sector in which a clinician works may influence their perceptions and (3) the perceptions of Australian physiotherapists about how physiotherapist prescribing might impact the care that the profession can provide. DESIGN: A cross-sectional descriptive survey using open and closed questions. SETTING: Participants completed an online questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: 883 Australian Health Professionals Registration Authority (AHPRA)-registered physiotherapists, working across all states and territories. OUTCOME MEASURES: An online questionnaire was developed by a panel of subject experts and pretested (n=10) for internal consistency. A hyperlink to the questionnaire was emailed to all members of the Australian Physiotherapy Association. A reminder email was sent 4 weeks later. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, with use of absolute risk reductions (ARRs) and 95% CIs to determine the likelihood that health sector or geographical location were associated with specific views. Thematic analysis enabled synthesis of the qualitative data. RESULTS: 79.0% participants felt that physiotherapist prescribing should be introduced in Australia, with 71.2% wanting to train as prescribers. Clinical governance, risk management, regulation of clinicians and the development of an education framework were identified as priorities for implementation. Participants working in the private sector were significantly more likely to train as prescribers than those in the public sector (ARR 9.9%; 95% CI 3.5 to 16.4) or educational/research institutions (ARR 23.3%; 95% CI 12.8 to 33.8), with city dwellers significantly more likely to train compared with physiotherapists in remote regions (ARR 19.8%; 95% CI 0.8 to 39.2). Physiotherapist prescribing was predicted to improve efficiency of healthcare delivery, access to medicines and reductions in healthcare costs. CONCLUSIONS: AHPRA-registered physiotherapists perceive that the introduction of autonomous physiotherapist prescribing would be beneficial for the Australian population and should be introduced. Decision makers should consider the results of this survey in conjunction with cost–benefit and risk analysis when planning the introduction of physiotherapist prescribing. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6530306/ /pubmed/31110086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024991 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Noblet, Timothy David
Marriott, John F
Jones, Taryn
Dean, Catherine
Rushton, Alison B
Perceptions about the implementation of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia: a national survey of Australian physiotherapists
title Perceptions about the implementation of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia: a national survey of Australian physiotherapists
title_full Perceptions about the implementation of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia: a national survey of Australian physiotherapists
title_fullStr Perceptions about the implementation of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia: a national survey of Australian physiotherapists
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions about the implementation of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia: a national survey of Australian physiotherapists
title_short Perceptions about the implementation of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia: a national survey of Australian physiotherapists
title_sort perceptions about the implementation of physiotherapist prescribing in australia: a national survey of australian physiotherapists
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31110086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024991
work_keys_str_mv AT noblettimothydavid perceptionsabouttheimplementationofphysiotherapistprescribinginaustraliaanationalsurveyofaustralianphysiotherapists
AT marriottjohnf perceptionsabouttheimplementationofphysiotherapistprescribinginaustraliaanationalsurveyofaustralianphysiotherapists
AT jonestaryn perceptionsabouttheimplementationofphysiotherapistprescribinginaustraliaanationalsurveyofaustralianphysiotherapists
AT deancatherine perceptionsabouttheimplementationofphysiotherapistprescribinginaustraliaanationalsurveyofaustralianphysiotherapists
AT rushtonalisonb perceptionsabouttheimplementationofphysiotherapistprescribinginaustraliaanationalsurveyofaustralianphysiotherapists