Cargando…

Process evaluation of complex interventions tested in randomised controlled trials in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of complex interventions for the management of musculoskeletal disorders has been estimated in many randomised clinical trials (RCTs). These trials inform which interventions are the most effective, however they do not always inform how an intervention achieved its cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ribeiro, Daniel C, Abbott, J Haxby, Sharma, Saurab, Lamb, Sarah E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31110107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028160
_version_ 1783420617871065088
author Ribeiro, Daniel C
Abbott, J Haxby
Sharma, Saurab
Lamb, Sarah E
author_facet Ribeiro, Daniel C
Abbott, J Haxby
Sharma, Saurab
Lamb, Sarah E
author_sort Ribeiro, Daniel C
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of complex interventions for the management of musculoskeletal disorders has been estimated in many randomised clinical trials (RCTs). These trials inform which interventions are the most effective, however they do not always inform how an intervention achieved its clinical outcomes, nor how and what elements of an intervention were delivered to patients. Such information is useful for translating findings into clinical practice. A few process evaluation studies have been conducted alongside RCTs and a variety of methods have been used. To gain a better understanding of current practices of process evaluation in RCTs in musculoskeletal disorders, this systematic review is designed to answer the following research question: How are process evaluation of complex interventions tested in RCTs in musculoskeletal disorders being conducted? METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will systematically search seven electronic databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane database) from the date of inception to August 2018 for studies on process evaluation of RCTs on non-surgical and non-pharmacological management of musculoskeletal disorders. We will include qualitative and quantitative studies conducted alongside RCTs, reported with the RCTs or separate studies that assessed interventions for musculoskeletal disorders. Two reviewers will screen abstracts and apply prespecified inclusion criteria to identify relevant studies, extract the data and assess the risk of bias within included studies. We will follow recommendations from the ‘Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group Guidance Series’ when assessing methodological strengths and limitations of included studies. We will use a narrative synthesis to describe findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as this review will not collect original data. Findings from this systematic review will be presented at a scientific conference and published in a peer reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018109600
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6530329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65303292019-06-07 Process evaluation of complex interventions tested in randomised controlled trials in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review protocol Ribeiro, Daniel C Abbott, J Haxby Sharma, Saurab Lamb, Sarah E BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of complex interventions for the management of musculoskeletal disorders has been estimated in many randomised clinical trials (RCTs). These trials inform which interventions are the most effective, however they do not always inform how an intervention achieved its clinical outcomes, nor how and what elements of an intervention were delivered to patients. Such information is useful for translating findings into clinical practice. A few process evaluation studies have been conducted alongside RCTs and a variety of methods have been used. To gain a better understanding of current practices of process evaluation in RCTs in musculoskeletal disorders, this systematic review is designed to answer the following research question: How are process evaluation of complex interventions tested in RCTs in musculoskeletal disorders being conducted? METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will systematically search seven electronic databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane database) from the date of inception to August 2018 for studies on process evaluation of RCTs on non-surgical and non-pharmacological management of musculoskeletal disorders. We will include qualitative and quantitative studies conducted alongside RCTs, reported with the RCTs or separate studies that assessed interventions for musculoskeletal disorders. Two reviewers will screen abstracts and apply prespecified inclusion criteria to identify relevant studies, extract the data and assess the risk of bias within included studies. We will follow recommendations from the ‘Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group Guidance Series’ when assessing methodological strengths and limitations of included studies. We will use a narrative synthesis to describe findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as this review will not collect original data. Findings from this systematic review will be presented at a scientific conference and published in a peer reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018109600 BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6530329/ /pubmed/31110107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028160 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Ribeiro, Daniel C
Abbott, J Haxby
Sharma, Saurab
Lamb, Sarah E
Process evaluation of complex interventions tested in randomised controlled trials in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review protocol
title Process evaluation of complex interventions tested in randomised controlled trials in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review protocol
title_full Process evaluation of complex interventions tested in randomised controlled trials in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Process evaluation of complex interventions tested in randomised controlled trials in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Process evaluation of complex interventions tested in randomised controlled trials in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review protocol
title_short Process evaluation of complex interventions tested in randomised controlled trials in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review protocol
title_sort process evaluation of complex interventions tested in randomised controlled trials in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review protocol
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31110107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028160
work_keys_str_mv AT ribeirodanielc processevaluationofcomplexinterventionstestedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsinmusculoskeletaldisordersasystematicreviewprotocol
AT abbottjhaxby processevaluationofcomplexinterventionstestedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsinmusculoskeletaldisordersasystematicreviewprotocol
AT sharmasaurab processevaluationofcomplexinterventionstestedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsinmusculoskeletaldisordersasystematicreviewprotocol
AT lambsarahe processevaluationofcomplexinterventionstestedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsinmusculoskeletaldisordersasystematicreviewprotocol