Cargando…

Protocol for the development of a core indicator set for reporting burn wound infection in trials: ICon-B study

INTRODUCTION: Systematic reviews of high-quality randomised controlled trials are necessary to identify effective interventions to impact burn wound infection (BWI) outcomes. Evidence synthesis requires that BWI is reported in a consistent manner. Cochrane reviews investigating interventions for bur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davies, Anna, Teare, Louise, Falder, Sian, Coy, Karen, Dumville, Jo C, Collins, Declan, Moore, Luke, Dheansa, Baljit, Jenkins, A Toby A, Booth, Simon, Agha, Riaz, Shah, Mamta, Marlow, Karen, Young, Amber
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31092650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026056
_version_ 1783420629154791424
author Davies, Anna
Teare, Louise
Falder, Sian
Coy, Karen
Dumville, Jo C
Collins, Declan
Moore, Luke
Dheansa, Baljit
Jenkins, A Toby A
Booth, Simon
Agha, Riaz
Shah, Mamta
Marlow, Karen
Young, Amber
author_facet Davies, Anna
Teare, Louise
Falder, Sian
Coy, Karen
Dumville, Jo C
Collins, Declan
Moore, Luke
Dheansa, Baljit
Jenkins, A Toby A
Booth, Simon
Agha, Riaz
Shah, Mamta
Marlow, Karen
Young, Amber
author_sort Davies, Anna
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Systematic reviews of high-quality randomised controlled trials are necessary to identify effective interventions to impact burn wound infection (BWI) outcomes. Evidence synthesis requires that BWI is reported in a consistent manner. Cochrane reviews investigating interventions for burns report that the indicators used to diagnose BWI are variable or not described, indicating a need to standardise reporting. BWI is complex and diagnosed by clinician judgement, informed by patient-reported symptoms, clinical signs, serum markers of inflammation and bacteria in the wound. Indicators for reporting BWI should be important for diagnosis, frequently observed in patients with BWI and assessed as part of routine healthcare. A minimum (core) set of indicators of BWI, reported consistently, will facilitate evidence synthesis and support clinical decision-making. AIMS: The Infection Consensus in Burns study aims to identify a core indicator set for reporting the diagnosis of BWI in research studies. METHODS: (1) Evidence review: a systematic review of indicators used in trials and observational studies reporting BWI outcomes to identify a long list of candidate indicators; (2) refinement of the long list into a smaller set of survey questions with an expert steering group; (3) a two-round Delphi survey with 100 multidisciplinary expert stakeholders, to achieve consensus on a short list of indicators; (4) a consensus meeting with expert stakeholders to agree on the BWI core indicator set. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Participants will be recruited through professional bodies, such that ethical approval from the National Health Service (NHS) Health Research Authority (HRA) is not needed. The core indicator set will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, co-production with journal editors, research funders and professional bodies, and presentation at national conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018096647.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6530370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65303702019-06-07 Protocol for the development of a core indicator set for reporting burn wound infection in trials: ICon-B study Davies, Anna Teare, Louise Falder, Sian Coy, Karen Dumville, Jo C Collins, Declan Moore, Luke Dheansa, Baljit Jenkins, A Toby A Booth, Simon Agha, Riaz Shah, Mamta Marlow, Karen Young, Amber BMJ Open Infectious Diseases INTRODUCTION: Systematic reviews of high-quality randomised controlled trials are necessary to identify effective interventions to impact burn wound infection (BWI) outcomes. Evidence synthesis requires that BWI is reported in a consistent manner. Cochrane reviews investigating interventions for burns report that the indicators used to diagnose BWI are variable or not described, indicating a need to standardise reporting. BWI is complex and diagnosed by clinician judgement, informed by patient-reported symptoms, clinical signs, serum markers of inflammation and bacteria in the wound. Indicators for reporting BWI should be important for diagnosis, frequently observed in patients with BWI and assessed as part of routine healthcare. A minimum (core) set of indicators of BWI, reported consistently, will facilitate evidence synthesis and support clinical decision-making. AIMS: The Infection Consensus in Burns study aims to identify a core indicator set for reporting the diagnosis of BWI in research studies. METHODS: (1) Evidence review: a systematic review of indicators used in trials and observational studies reporting BWI outcomes to identify a long list of candidate indicators; (2) refinement of the long list into a smaller set of survey questions with an expert steering group; (3) a two-round Delphi survey with 100 multidisciplinary expert stakeholders, to achieve consensus on a short list of indicators; (4) a consensus meeting with expert stakeholders to agree on the BWI core indicator set. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Participants will be recruited through professional bodies, such that ethical approval from the National Health Service (NHS) Health Research Authority (HRA) is not needed. The core indicator set will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, co-production with journal editors, research funders and professional bodies, and presentation at national conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018096647. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6530370/ /pubmed/31092650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026056 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Infectious Diseases
Davies, Anna
Teare, Louise
Falder, Sian
Coy, Karen
Dumville, Jo C
Collins, Declan
Moore, Luke
Dheansa, Baljit
Jenkins, A Toby A
Booth, Simon
Agha, Riaz
Shah, Mamta
Marlow, Karen
Young, Amber
Protocol for the development of a core indicator set for reporting burn wound infection in trials: ICon-B study
title Protocol for the development of a core indicator set for reporting burn wound infection in trials: ICon-B study
title_full Protocol for the development of a core indicator set for reporting burn wound infection in trials: ICon-B study
title_fullStr Protocol for the development of a core indicator set for reporting burn wound infection in trials: ICon-B study
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for the development of a core indicator set for reporting burn wound infection in trials: ICon-B study
title_short Protocol for the development of a core indicator set for reporting burn wound infection in trials: ICon-B study
title_sort protocol for the development of a core indicator set for reporting burn wound infection in trials: icon-b study
topic Infectious Diseases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31092650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026056
work_keys_str_mv AT daviesanna protocolforthedevelopmentofacoreindicatorsetforreportingburnwoundinfectionintrialsiconbstudy
AT tearelouise protocolforthedevelopmentofacoreindicatorsetforreportingburnwoundinfectionintrialsiconbstudy
AT faldersian protocolforthedevelopmentofacoreindicatorsetforreportingburnwoundinfectionintrialsiconbstudy
AT coykaren protocolforthedevelopmentofacoreindicatorsetforreportingburnwoundinfectionintrialsiconbstudy
AT dumvillejoc protocolforthedevelopmentofacoreindicatorsetforreportingburnwoundinfectionintrialsiconbstudy
AT collinsdeclan protocolforthedevelopmentofacoreindicatorsetforreportingburnwoundinfectionintrialsiconbstudy
AT mooreluke protocolforthedevelopmentofacoreindicatorsetforreportingburnwoundinfectionintrialsiconbstudy
AT dheansabaljit protocolforthedevelopmentofacoreindicatorsetforreportingburnwoundinfectionintrialsiconbstudy
AT jenkinsatobya protocolforthedevelopmentofacoreindicatorsetforreportingburnwoundinfectionintrialsiconbstudy
AT boothsimon protocolforthedevelopmentofacoreindicatorsetforreportingburnwoundinfectionintrialsiconbstudy
AT aghariaz protocolforthedevelopmentofacoreindicatorsetforreportingburnwoundinfectionintrialsiconbstudy
AT shahmamta protocolforthedevelopmentofacoreindicatorsetforreportingburnwoundinfectionintrialsiconbstudy
AT marlowkaren protocolforthedevelopmentofacoreindicatorsetforreportingburnwoundinfectionintrialsiconbstudy
AT youngamber protocolforthedevelopmentofacoreindicatorsetforreportingburnwoundinfectionintrialsiconbstudy