Cargando…

Effectiveness of surgical fixation for lateral compression type one (LC-1) fragility fractures of the pelvis: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: To undertake a systematic review of the evidence base for the effectiveness of surgical fixation of lateral compression (LC-1) fragility fractures of the pelvis compared with non-surgical approaches. SEARCHES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and two in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Booth, Alison, Ingoe, Helen Margaret Ann, Northgraves, Matthew, Coleman, Elizabeth, Harden, Melissa, Kassam, Jamila, Kwok, Iris, Hilton, Catherine, Bates, Peter, McDaid, Catriona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31110085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024737
_version_ 1783420634239336448
author Booth, Alison
Ingoe, Helen Margaret Ann
Northgraves, Matthew
Coleman, Elizabeth
Harden, Melissa
Kassam, Jamila
Kwok, Iris
Hilton, Catherine
Bates, Peter
McDaid, Catriona
author_facet Booth, Alison
Ingoe, Helen Margaret Ann
Northgraves, Matthew
Coleman, Elizabeth
Harden, Melissa
Kassam, Jamila
Kwok, Iris
Hilton, Catherine
Bates, Peter
McDaid, Catriona
author_sort Booth, Alison
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To undertake a systematic review of the evidence base for the effectiveness of surgical fixation of lateral compression (LC-1) fragility fractures of the pelvis compared with non-surgical approaches. SEARCHES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and two international trials registers were searched up to January 2017 (MEDLINE to February 2019) for studies of internal or external fixation of fragility fractures of the pelvis. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with lateral compression pelvic fractures, sustained as the result of a low-energy mechanism, defined as a fall from standing height or less. INTERVENTIONS: Surgery using either external or internal fixation devices. Conservative non-surgical treatment was the defined comparator. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes of interest were patient mobility and function, pain, quality of life, fracture union, mortality, hospital length of stay and complications (additional operative procedures, number and type of adverse events and serious adverse events). QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND SYNTHESIS: The Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Case Series was used to assess the included studies. Results were presented in a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: Of 3421 records identified, four retrospective case series met the inclusion criteria. Fixation types were not consistent between studies or within studies and most patients had more than one type of pelvic fixation. Where reported, mobility and function improved post-surgery, and a reduction in pain was recorded. Length of hospital stay ranged from 4 days to 54 days for surgical fixation of any type. Reported complications and adverse outcomes included: infections, implant loosening, pneumonia and thrombosis. Use of analgesia was not reported. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support guidance on the most effective treatment for patients who fail to mobilise after sustaining an LC-1 fragility fracture. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017055872.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6530388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65303882019-06-07 Effectiveness of surgical fixation for lateral compression type one (LC-1) fragility fractures of the pelvis: a systematic review Booth, Alison Ingoe, Helen Margaret Ann Northgraves, Matthew Coleman, Elizabeth Harden, Melissa Kassam, Jamila Kwok, Iris Hilton, Catherine Bates, Peter McDaid, Catriona BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVES: To undertake a systematic review of the evidence base for the effectiveness of surgical fixation of lateral compression (LC-1) fragility fractures of the pelvis compared with non-surgical approaches. SEARCHES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and two international trials registers were searched up to January 2017 (MEDLINE to February 2019) for studies of internal or external fixation of fragility fractures of the pelvis. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with lateral compression pelvic fractures, sustained as the result of a low-energy mechanism, defined as a fall from standing height or less. INTERVENTIONS: Surgery using either external or internal fixation devices. Conservative non-surgical treatment was the defined comparator. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes of interest were patient mobility and function, pain, quality of life, fracture union, mortality, hospital length of stay and complications (additional operative procedures, number and type of adverse events and serious adverse events). QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND SYNTHESIS: The Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Case Series was used to assess the included studies. Results were presented in a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: Of 3421 records identified, four retrospective case series met the inclusion criteria. Fixation types were not consistent between studies or within studies and most patients had more than one type of pelvic fixation. Where reported, mobility and function improved post-surgery, and a reduction in pain was recorded. Length of hospital stay ranged from 4 days to 54 days for surgical fixation of any type. Reported complications and adverse outcomes included: infections, implant loosening, pneumonia and thrombosis. Use of analgesia was not reported. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support guidance on the most effective treatment for patients who fail to mobilise after sustaining an LC-1 fragility fracture. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017055872. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6530388/ /pubmed/31110085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024737 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Booth, Alison
Ingoe, Helen Margaret Ann
Northgraves, Matthew
Coleman, Elizabeth
Harden, Melissa
Kassam, Jamila
Kwok, Iris
Hilton, Catherine
Bates, Peter
McDaid, Catriona
Effectiveness of surgical fixation for lateral compression type one (LC-1) fragility fractures of the pelvis: a systematic review
title Effectiveness of surgical fixation for lateral compression type one (LC-1) fragility fractures of the pelvis: a systematic review
title_full Effectiveness of surgical fixation for lateral compression type one (LC-1) fragility fractures of the pelvis: a systematic review
title_fullStr Effectiveness of surgical fixation for lateral compression type one (LC-1) fragility fractures of the pelvis: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of surgical fixation for lateral compression type one (LC-1) fragility fractures of the pelvis: a systematic review
title_short Effectiveness of surgical fixation for lateral compression type one (LC-1) fragility fractures of the pelvis: a systematic review
title_sort effectiveness of surgical fixation for lateral compression type one (lc-1) fragility fractures of the pelvis: a systematic review
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31110085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024737
work_keys_str_mv AT boothalison effectivenessofsurgicalfixationforlateralcompressiontypeonelc1fragilityfracturesofthepelvisasystematicreview
AT ingoehelenmargaretann effectivenessofsurgicalfixationforlateralcompressiontypeonelc1fragilityfracturesofthepelvisasystematicreview
AT northgravesmatthew effectivenessofsurgicalfixationforlateralcompressiontypeonelc1fragilityfracturesofthepelvisasystematicreview
AT colemanelizabeth effectivenessofsurgicalfixationforlateralcompressiontypeonelc1fragilityfracturesofthepelvisasystematicreview
AT hardenmelissa effectivenessofsurgicalfixationforlateralcompressiontypeonelc1fragilityfracturesofthepelvisasystematicreview
AT kassamjamila effectivenessofsurgicalfixationforlateralcompressiontypeonelc1fragilityfracturesofthepelvisasystematicreview
AT kwokiris effectivenessofsurgicalfixationforlateralcompressiontypeonelc1fragilityfracturesofthepelvisasystematicreview
AT hiltoncatherine effectivenessofsurgicalfixationforlateralcompressiontypeonelc1fragilityfracturesofthepelvisasystematicreview
AT batespeter effectivenessofsurgicalfixationforlateralcompressiontypeonelc1fragilityfracturesofthepelvisasystematicreview
AT mcdaidcatriona effectivenessofsurgicalfixationforlateralcompressiontypeonelc1fragilityfracturesofthepelvisasystematicreview