Cargando…

Clinical comparison between a percutaneous hydraulic pressure delivery system and balloon tamp system using high-viscosity cement for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

OBJECTIVES: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) affect the elderly population, especially postmenopausal women. Percutaneous kyphoplasty is designed to treat painful vertebral compression fractures for which conservative therapy has been unsuccessful. High-viscosity cement can be in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qin, Jie, Li, Jianjun, Liu, Ying, Zhao, Bo, Dong, Hui, Dong, Bo, Zhang, Rui, Ning, Ning, Zhang, Xin, Cui, Feng, Li, Haopeng, He, Xijing, Wang, Dong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31166471
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2019/e741
_version_ 1783420646215122944
author Qin, Jie
Li, Jianjun
Liu, Ying
Zhao, Bo
Dong, Hui
Dong, Bo
Zhang, Rui
Ning, Ning
Zhang, Xin
Cui, Feng
Li, Haopeng
He, Xijing
Wang, Dong
author_facet Qin, Jie
Li, Jianjun
Liu, Ying
Zhao, Bo
Dong, Hui
Dong, Bo
Zhang, Rui
Ning, Ning
Zhang, Xin
Cui, Feng
Li, Haopeng
He, Xijing
Wang, Dong
author_sort Qin, Jie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) affect the elderly population, especially postmenopausal women. Percutaneous kyphoplasty is designed to treat painful vertebral compression fractures for which conservative therapy has been unsuccessful. High-viscosity cement can be injected by either a hydraulic pressure delivery system (HPDS) or a balloon tamp system (BTS). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the safety and clinical outcomes of these two systems. METHODS: A random, multicenter, prospective study was performed. Clinical and radiological assessments were carried out, including assessments of general surgery information, visual analog scale, quality of life, cement leakage, and height and angle restoration. RESULTS: Using either the HPDS or BTS to inject high-viscosity cement effectively relieved pain and improved the patients' quality of life immediately, and these effects lasted at least two years. The HPDS using high-viscosity cement reduced cost, surgery time, and radiation exposure and showed similar clinical results to those of the BTS. In addition, the leakage rate and the incidence of adjacent vertebral fractures after the HPDS treatment were reduced compared with those after treatment using the classic vertebroplasty devices. However, the BTS had better height and angle restoration abilities. CONCLUSIONS: The percutaneous HPDS with high-viscosity cement has similar clinical outcomes to those of traditional procedures in the treatment of vertebral fractures in the elderly. The HPDS with high-viscosity cement is better than the BTS in the treatment of mild and moderate OVCFs and could be an alternative method for the treatment of severe OVCFs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6530436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65304362019-05-30 Clinical comparison between a percutaneous hydraulic pressure delivery system and balloon tamp system using high-viscosity cement for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures Qin, Jie Li, Jianjun Liu, Ying Zhao, Bo Dong, Hui Dong, Bo Zhang, Rui Ning, Ning Zhang, Xin Cui, Feng Li, Haopeng He, Xijing Wang, Dong Clinics (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVES: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) affect the elderly population, especially postmenopausal women. Percutaneous kyphoplasty is designed to treat painful vertebral compression fractures for which conservative therapy has been unsuccessful. High-viscosity cement can be injected by either a hydraulic pressure delivery system (HPDS) or a balloon tamp system (BTS). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the safety and clinical outcomes of these two systems. METHODS: A random, multicenter, prospective study was performed. Clinical and radiological assessments were carried out, including assessments of general surgery information, visual analog scale, quality of life, cement leakage, and height and angle restoration. RESULTS: Using either the HPDS or BTS to inject high-viscosity cement effectively relieved pain and improved the patients' quality of life immediately, and these effects lasted at least two years. The HPDS using high-viscosity cement reduced cost, surgery time, and radiation exposure and showed similar clinical results to those of the BTS. In addition, the leakage rate and the incidence of adjacent vertebral fractures after the HPDS treatment were reduced compared with those after treatment using the classic vertebroplasty devices. However, the BTS had better height and angle restoration abilities. CONCLUSIONS: The percutaneous HPDS with high-viscosity cement has similar clinical outcomes to those of traditional procedures in the treatment of vertebral fractures in the elderly. The HPDS with high-viscosity cement is better than the BTS in the treatment of mild and moderate OVCFs and could be an alternative method for the treatment of severe OVCFs. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2019-05-22 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6530436/ /pubmed/31166471 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2019/e741 Text en Copyright © 2019 CLINICS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Qin, Jie
Li, Jianjun
Liu, Ying
Zhao, Bo
Dong, Hui
Dong, Bo
Zhang, Rui
Ning, Ning
Zhang, Xin
Cui, Feng
Li, Haopeng
He, Xijing
Wang, Dong
Clinical comparison between a percutaneous hydraulic pressure delivery system and balloon tamp system using high-viscosity cement for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
title Clinical comparison between a percutaneous hydraulic pressure delivery system and balloon tamp system using high-viscosity cement for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
title_full Clinical comparison between a percutaneous hydraulic pressure delivery system and balloon tamp system using high-viscosity cement for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
title_fullStr Clinical comparison between a percutaneous hydraulic pressure delivery system and balloon tamp system using high-viscosity cement for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
title_full_unstemmed Clinical comparison between a percutaneous hydraulic pressure delivery system and balloon tamp system using high-viscosity cement for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
title_short Clinical comparison between a percutaneous hydraulic pressure delivery system and balloon tamp system using high-viscosity cement for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
title_sort clinical comparison between a percutaneous hydraulic pressure delivery system and balloon tamp system using high-viscosity cement for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31166471
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2019/e741
work_keys_str_mv AT qinjie clinicalcomparisonbetweenapercutaneoushydraulicpressuredeliverysystemandballoontampsystemusinghighviscositycementforthetreatmentofosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractures
AT lijianjun clinicalcomparisonbetweenapercutaneoushydraulicpressuredeliverysystemandballoontampsystemusinghighviscositycementforthetreatmentofosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractures
AT liuying clinicalcomparisonbetweenapercutaneoushydraulicpressuredeliverysystemandballoontampsystemusinghighviscositycementforthetreatmentofosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractures
AT zhaobo clinicalcomparisonbetweenapercutaneoushydraulicpressuredeliverysystemandballoontampsystemusinghighviscositycementforthetreatmentofosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractures
AT donghui clinicalcomparisonbetweenapercutaneoushydraulicpressuredeliverysystemandballoontampsystemusinghighviscositycementforthetreatmentofosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractures
AT dongbo clinicalcomparisonbetweenapercutaneoushydraulicpressuredeliverysystemandballoontampsystemusinghighviscositycementforthetreatmentofosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractures
AT zhangrui clinicalcomparisonbetweenapercutaneoushydraulicpressuredeliverysystemandballoontampsystemusinghighviscositycementforthetreatmentofosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractures
AT ningning clinicalcomparisonbetweenapercutaneoushydraulicpressuredeliverysystemandballoontampsystemusinghighviscositycementforthetreatmentofosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractures
AT zhangxin clinicalcomparisonbetweenapercutaneoushydraulicpressuredeliverysystemandballoontampsystemusinghighviscositycementforthetreatmentofosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractures
AT cuifeng clinicalcomparisonbetweenapercutaneoushydraulicpressuredeliverysystemandballoontampsystemusinghighviscositycementforthetreatmentofosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractures
AT lihaopeng clinicalcomparisonbetweenapercutaneoushydraulicpressuredeliverysystemandballoontampsystemusinghighviscositycementforthetreatmentofosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractures
AT hexijing clinicalcomparisonbetweenapercutaneoushydraulicpressuredeliverysystemandballoontampsystemusinghighviscositycementforthetreatmentofosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractures
AT wangdong clinicalcomparisonbetweenapercutaneoushydraulicpressuredeliverysystemandballoontampsystemusinghighviscositycementforthetreatmentofosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractures