Cargando…

Clinical efficacy of orthopilot navigation system versus conventional manual of total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical efficacy between Orthopilot navigation system and conventional manual surgery in total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: Electronic databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating Orthopilot navigation system versus conventiona...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jia, Jianguo, Zhao, Qun, Lu, Pei, Fan, Guiyong, Chen, Hao, Liu, Chaoqun, Liu, Jinlian, Chen, Sheng, Jin, Zhengshuai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31096443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015471
_version_ 1783420765214867456
author Jia, Jianguo
Zhao, Qun
Lu, Pei
Fan, Guiyong
Chen, Hao
Liu, Chaoqun
Liu, Jinlian
Chen, Sheng
Jin, Zhengshuai
author_facet Jia, Jianguo
Zhao, Qun
Lu, Pei
Fan, Guiyong
Chen, Hao
Liu, Chaoqun
Liu, Jinlian
Chen, Sheng
Jin, Zhengshuai
author_sort Jia, Jianguo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical efficacy between Orthopilot navigation system and conventional manual surgery in total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: Electronic databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating Orthopilot navigation system versus conventional manual in patients undergoing THA. Outcome measurements include anteversion angle, inclination angle, preoperative leg length discrepancy, postoperative leg length discrepancy and femoral offset. Statistical software Stata 12.0 was used for data-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 5 studies were finally included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the conventional manual group have a less anteversion angle than that in Orthopilot navigation system group (weighted mean difference (WMD) = 4.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.53, 5.82, P = .000). And pooled analysis showed that the inclination angle in Orthopilot navigation group was less than that in conventional manual group (WMD = −4.19, 95% CI = −8.00, −0.37, P = .031). There was no significant difference between the preoperative leg length discrepancy and postoperative leg length discrepancy (P > .05). Orthopilot navigation system compared with conventional manual procedure was associated with decreased of femoral offset by 2.76 (WMD = −2.76, 95%CI = −3.90, −1.62, P = .000). CONCLUSION: Both Orthopilot navigation system and conventional THA result in significant improvements in patient function with similar overall complication rates and have their own edges in cup position.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6531135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65311352019-06-25 Clinical efficacy of orthopilot navigation system versus conventional manual of total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis Jia, Jianguo Zhao, Qun Lu, Pei Fan, Guiyong Chen, Hao Liu, Chaoqun Liu, Jinlian Chen, Sheng Jin, Zhengshuai Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical efficacy between Orthopilot navigation system and conventional manual surgery in total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: Electronic databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating Orthopilot navigation system versus conventional manual in patients undergoing THA. Outcome measurements include anteversion angle, inclination angle, preoperative leg length discrepancy, postoperative leg length discrepancy and femoral offset. Statistical software Stata 12.0 was used for data-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 5 studies were finally included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the conventional manual group have a less anteversion angle than that in Orthopilot navigation system group (weighted mean difference (WMD) = 4.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.53, 5.82, P = .000). And pooled analysis showed that the inclination angle in Orthopilot navigation group was less than that in conventional manual group (WMD = −4.19, 95% CI = −8.00, −0.37, P = .031). There was no significant difference between the preoperative leg length discrepancy and postoperative leg length discrepancy (P > .05). Orthopilot navigation system compared with conventional manual procedure was associated with decreased of femoral offset by 2.76 (WMD = −2.76, 95%CI = −3.90, −1.62, P = .000). CONCLUSION: Both Orthopilot navigation system and conventional THA result in significant improvements in patient function with similar overall complication rates and have their own edges in cup position. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6531135/ /pubmed/31096443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015471 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Jia, Jianguo
Zhao, Qun
Lu, Pei
Fan, Guiyong
Chen, Hao
Liu, Chaoqun
Liu, Jinlian
Chen, Sheng
Jin, Zhengshuai
Clinical efficacy of orthopilot navigation system versus conventional manual of total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Clinical efficacy of orthopilot navigation system versus conventional manual of total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Clinical efficacy of orthopilot navigation system versus conventional manual of total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Clinical efficacy of orthopilot navigation system versus conventional manual of total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical efficacy of orthopilot navigation system versus conventional manual of total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Clinical efficacy of orthopilot navigation system versus conventional manual of total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort clinical efficacy of orthopilot navigation system versus conventional manual of total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31096443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015471
work_keys_str_mv AT jiajianguo clinicalefficacyoforthopilotnavigationsystemversusconventionalmanualoftotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaoqun clinicalefficacyoforthopilotnavigationsystemversusconventionalmanualoftotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lupei clinicalefficacyoforthopilotnavigationsystemversusconventionalmanualoftotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fanguiyong clinicalefficacyoforthopilotnavigationsystemversusconventionalmanualoftotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenhao clinicalefficacyoforthopilotnavigationsystemversusconventionalmanualoftotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuchaoqun clinicalefficacyoforthopilotnavigationsystemversusconventionalmanualoftotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liujinlian clinicalefficacyoforthopilotnavigationsystemversusconventionalmanualoftotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chensheng clinicalefficacyoforthopilotnavigationsystemversusconventionalmanualoftotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jinzhengshuai clinicalefficacyoforthopilotnavigationsystemversusconventionalmanualoftotalhiparthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis