Cargando…
The association and diagnostic value of red blood cell distribution width in colorectal cancer
Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is associated with several diseases. However, the diagnostic value of RDW and its related factors remain unclear in colorectal cancer (CRC). This single-center retrospective study evaluated 211 Chinese CRC patients and 103 healthy controls. The association of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31083220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015560 |
_version_ | 1783420773771247616 |
---|---|
author | Shi, Cheng Xie, Mingzhi Li, Lihua Li, Kezhi Hu, Bang-Li |
author_facet | Shi, Cheng Xie, Mingzhi Li, Lihua Li, Kezhi Hu, Bang-Li |
author_sort | Shi, Cheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is associated with several diseases. However, the diagnostic value of RDW and its related factors remain unclear in colorectal cancer (CRC). This single-center retrospective study evaluated 211 Chinese CRC patients and 103 healthy controls. The association of RDW with the clinical parameters of CRC, as well as its correlations with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) were analyzed. The diagnostic value of RDW alone or combined with CEA and CA19-9 was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. A meta-analysis was also performed to combine our data with previously published data to enhance our findings. In the CRC patients, RDW was clearly elevated and was significantly associated with CRC tumor location, histological type, T status (but not N or M status), and clinical stage. However, RDW was not significantly correlated with CEA or CA19-9 levels. Using RDW to diagnose CRC provided a sensitivity of 53.1% and specificity of 77.7%. The diagnostic accuracy of RDW was enhanced by combining RDW with CEA and CA19-9 levels. We identified 5 previous studies with 633 CRC patients and 1050 controls, which were combined with our cases and controls. The meta-analysis revealed an overall sensitivity of 69%, specificity of 70%, and an area under the curve of 0.74. In CRC cases, RDW was associated with tumor location, histological type, T status, and clinical stage. Furthermore, RDW had a moderate value for diagnosing CRC and might be useful in this setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6531168 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65311682019-06-25 The association and diagnostic value of red blood cell distribution width in colorectal cancer Shi, Cheng Xie, Mingzhi Li, Lihua Li, Kezhi Hu, Bang-Li Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is associated with several diseases. However, the diagnostic value of RDW and its related factors remain unclear in colorectal cancer (CRC). This single-center retrospective study evaluated 211 Chinese CRC patients and 103 healthy controls. The association of RDW with the clinical parameters of CRC, as well as its correlations with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) were analyzed. The diagnostic value of RDW alone or combined with CEA and CA19-9 was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. A meta-analysis was also performed to combine our data with previously published data to enhance our findings. In the CRC patients, RDW was clearly elevated and was significantly associated with CRC tumor location, histological type, T status (but not N or M status), and clinical stage. However, RDW was not significantly correlated with CEA or CA19-9 levels. Using RDW to diagnose CRC provided a sensitivity of 53.1% and specificity of 77.7%. The diagnostic accuracy of RDW was enhanced by combining RDW with CEA and CA19-9 levels. We identified 5 previous studies with 633 CRC patients and 1050 controls, which were combined with our cases and controls. The meta-analysis revealed an overall sensitivity of 69%, specificity of 70%, and an area under the curve of 0.74. In CRC cases, RDW was associated with tumor location, histological type, T status, and clinical stage. Furthermore, RDW had a moderate value for diagnosing CRC and might be useful in this setting. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6531168/ /pubmed/31083220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015560 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shi, Cheng Xie, Mingzhi Li, Lihua Li, Kezhi Hu, Bang-Li The association and diagnostic value of red blood cell distribution width in colorectal cancer |
title | The association and diagnostic value of red blood cell distribution width in colorectal cancer |
title_full | The association and diagnostic value of red blood cell distribution width in colorectal cancer |
title_fullStr | The association and diagnostic value of red blood cell distribution width in colorectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | The association and diagnostic value of red blood cell distribution width in colorectal cancer |
title_short | The association and diagnostic value of red blood cell distribution width in colorectal cancer |
title_sort | association and diagnostic value of red blood cell distribution width in colorectal cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31083220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015560 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shicheng theassociationanddiagnosticvalueofredbloodcelldistributionwidthincolorectalcancer AT xiemingzhi theassociationanddiagnosticvalueofredbloodcelldistributionwidthincolorectalcancer AT lilihua theassociationanddiagnosticvalueofredbloodcelldistributionwidthincolorectalcancer AT likezhi theassociationanddiagnosticvalueofredbloodcelldistributionwidthincolorectalcancer AT hubangli theassociationanddiagnosticvalueofredbloodcelldistributionwidthincolorectalcancer AT shicheng associationanddiagnosticvalueofredbloodcelldistributionwidthincolorectalcancer AT xiemingzhi associationanddiagnosticvalueofredbloodcelldistributionwidthincolorectalcancer AT lilihua associationanddiagnosticvalueofredbloodcelldistributionwidthincolorectalcancer AT likezhi associationanddiagnosticvalueofredbloodcelldistributionwidthincolorectalcancer AT hubangli associationanddiagnosticvalueofredbloodcelldistributionwidthincolorectalcancer |