Cargando…

Small incision discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in 98 patients with 5-year follow-up: A retrospective case series study

Optimal surgical technique to treat lumbar disc herniation (LDH) remains controversial. We described a small incision discectomy technique (SID), and to evaluate its safety and efficacy. A retrospective study involving 98 consecutive patients with LDH managed by SID was conducted. All patients were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ren, Zhinan, Li, Zheng, Li, Shugang, Xu, Derong, Chen, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31083228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015569
_version_ 1783420776598208512
author Ren, Zhinan
Li, Zheng
Li, Shugang
Xu, Derong
Chen, Xin
author_facet Ren, Zhinan
Li, Zheng
Li, Shugang
Xu, Derong
Chen, Xin
author_sort Ren, Zhinan
collection PubMed
description Optimal surgical technique to treat lumbar disc herniation (LDH) remains controversial. We described a small incision discectomy technique (SID), and to evaluate its safety and efficacy. A retrospective study involving 98 consecutive patients with LDH managed by SID was conducted. All patients were followed up for 5 years. Outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), operative time, length of incision, blood loss, hospital stay, hospitalization costs, x-ray exposure, reoperation, and complications. The results were determined to be excellent, good, fair, or poor according to the MacNab classification. All patients completed the 5-year follow-up. Relative to preoperative scores, VAS and JOA were both significantly improved. As a whole, 93.8% (92/98) patients showed excellent or good results, 3.1% (3/98) fair, and 3.1% (92/98) poor. The operation time, length of incision, blood loss, and hospital stay were 50 ± 11.1 minutes, 2.2 ± 0.3 cm, 35 ± 3.5 mL, and 4.3 ± 0.2 days, respectively. Additionally, compared with previous literature reports, the hospitalization costs and x-ray exposure were apparently less. The reoperation and recurrence rate were 3.2% and 2.1%. No complications were observed. From these data we conclude that SID appears to be a safe, cost-effective technique for LDH, and has lower x-rays exposure time when compared with literature of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6531178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65311782019-06-25 Small incision discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in 98 patients with 5-year follow-up: A retrospective case series study Ren, Zhinan Li, Zheng Li, Shugang Xu, Derong Chen, Xin Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article Optimal surgical technique to treat lumbar disc herniation (LDH) remains controversial. We described a small incision discectomy technique (SID), and to evaluate its safety and efficacy. A retrospective study involving 98 consecutive patients with LDH managed by SID was conducted. All patients were followed up for 5 years. Outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), operative time, length of incision, blood loss, hospital stay, hospitalization costs, x-ray exposure, reoperation, and complications. The results were determined to be excellent, good, fair, or poor according to the MacNab classification. All patients completed the 5-year follow-up. Relative to preoperative scores, VAS and JOA were both significantly improved. As a whole, 93.8% (92/98) patients showed excellent or good results, 3.1% (3/98) fair, and 3.1% (92/98) poor. The operation time, length of incision, blood loss, and hospital stay were 50 ± 11.1 minutes, 2.2 ± 0.3 cm, 35 ± 3.5 mL, and 4.3 ± 0.2 days, respectively. Additionally, compared with previous literature reports, the hospitalization costs and x-ray exposure were apparently less. The reoperation and recurrence rate were 3.2% and 2.1%. No complications were observed. From these data we conclude that SID appears to be a safe, cost-effective technique for LDH, and has lower x-rays exposure time when compared with literature of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6531178/ /pubmed/31083228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015569 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Ren, Zhinan
Li, Zheng
Li, Shugang
Xu, Derong
Chen, Xin
Small incision discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in 98 patients with 5-year follow-up: A retrospective case series study
title Small incision discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in 98 patients with 5-year follow-up: A retrospective case series study
title_full Small incision discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in 98 patients with 5-year follow-up: A retrospective case series study
title_fullStr Small incision discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in 98 patients with 5-year follow-up: A retrospective case series study
title_full_unstemmed Small incision discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in 98 patients with 5-year follow-up: A retrospective case series study
title_short Small incision discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in 98 patients with 5-year follow-up: A retrospective case series study
title_sort small incision discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in 98 patients with 5-year follow-up: a retrospective case series study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31083228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015569
work_keys_str_mv AT renzhinan smallincisiondiscectomyforlumbardischerniationin98patientswith5yearfollowuparetrospectivecaseseriesstudy
AT lizheng smallincisiondiscectomyforlumbardischerniationin98patientswith5yearfollowuparetrospectivecaseseriesstudy
AT lishugang smallincisiondiscectomyforlumbardischerniationin98patientswith5yearfollowuparetrospectivecaseseriesstudy
AT xuderong smallincisiondiscectomyforlumbardischerniationin98patientswith5yearfollowuparetrospectivecaseseriesstudy
AT chenxin smallincisiondiscectomyforlumbardischerniationin98patientswith5yearfollowuparetrospectivecaseseriesstudy