Cargando…
Small incision discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in 98 patients with 5-year follow-up: A retrospective case series study
Optimal surgical technique to treat lumbar disc herniation (LDH) remains controversial. We described a small incision discectomy technique (SID), and to evaluate its safety and efficacy. A retrospective study involving 98 consecutive patients with LDH managed by SID was conducted. All patients were...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31083228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015569 |
_version_ | 1783420776598208512 |
---|---|
author | Ren, Zhinan Li, Zheng Li, Shugang Xu, Derong Chen, Xin |
author_facet | Ren, Zhinan Li, Zheng Li, Shugang Xu, Derong Chen, Xin |
author_sort | Ren, Zhinan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Optimal surgical technique to treat lumbar disc herniation (LDH) remains controversial. We described a small incision discectomy technique (SID), and to evaluate its safety and efficacy. A retrospective study involving 98 consecutive patients with LDH managed by SID was conducted. All patients were followed up for 5 years. Outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), operative time, length of incision, blood loss, hospital stay, hospitalization costs, x-ray exposure, reoperation, and complications. The results were determined to be excellent, good, fair, or poor according to the MacNab classification. All patients completed the 5-year follow-up. Relative to preoperative scores, VAS and JOA were both significantly improved. As a whole, 93.8% (92/98) patients showed excellent or good results, 3.1% (3/98) fair, and 3.1% (92/98) poor. The operation time, length of incision, blood loss, and hospital stay were 50 ± 11.1 minutes, 2.2 ± 0.3 cm, 35 ± 3.5 mL, and 4.3 ± 0.2 days, respectively. Additionally, compared with previous literature reports, the hospitalization costs and x-ray exposure were apparently less. The reoperation and recurrence rate were 3.2% and 2.1%. No complications were observed. From these data we conclude that SID appears to be a safe, cost-effective technique for LDH, and has lower x-rays exposure time when compared with literature of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6531178 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65311782019-06-25 Small incision discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in 98 patients with 5-year follow-up: A retrospective case series study Ren, Zhinan Li, Zheng Li, Shugang Xu, Derong Chen, Xin Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article Optimal surgical technique to treat lumbar disc herniation (LDH) remains controversial. We described a small incision discectomy technique (SID), and to evaluate its safety and efficacy. A retrospective study involving 98 consecutive patients with LDH managed by SID was conducted. All patients were followed up for 5 years. Outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), operative time, length of incision, blood loss, hospital stay, hospitalization costs, x-ray exposure, reoperation, and complications. The results were determined to be excellent, good, fair, or poor according to the MacNab classification. All patients completed the 5-year follow-up. Relative to preoperative scores, VAS and JOA were both significantly improved. As a whole, 93.8% (92/98) patients showed excellent or good results, 3.1% (3/98) fair, and 3.1% (92/98) poor. The operation time, length of incision, blood loss, and hospital stay were 50 ± 11.1 minutes, 2.2 ± 0.3 cm, 35 ± 3.5 mL, and 4.3 ± 0.2 days, respectively. Additionally, compared with previous literature reports, the hospitalization costs and x-ray exposure were apparently less. The reoperation and recurrence rate were 3.2% and 2.1%. No complications were observed. From these data we conclude that SID appears to be a safe, cost-effective technique for LDH, and has lower x-rays exposure time when compared with literature of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6531178/ /pubmed/31083228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015569 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ren, Zhinan Li, Zheng Li, Shugang Xu, Derong Chen, Xin Small incision discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in 98 patients with 5-year follow-up: A retrospective case series study |
title | Small incision discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in 98 patients with 5-year follow-up: A retrospective case series study |
title_full | Small incision discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in 98 patients with 5-year follow-up: A retrospective case series study |
title_fullStr | Small incision discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in 98 patients with 5-year follow-up: A retrospective case series study |
title_full_unstemmed | Small incision discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in 98 patients with 5-year follow-up: A retrospective case series study |
title_short | Small incision discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in 98 patients with 5-year follow-up: A retrospective case series study |
title_sort | small incision discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in 98 patients with 5-year follow-up: a retrospective case series study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31083228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015569 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT renzhinan smallincisiondiscectomyforlumbardischerniationin98patientswith5yearfollowuparetrospectivecaseseriesstudy AT lizheng smallincisiondiscectomyforlumbardischerniationin98patientswith5yearfollowuparetrospectivecaseseriesstudy AT lishugang smallincisiondiscectomyforlumbardischerniationin98patientswith5yearfollowuparetrospectivecaseseriesstudy AT xuderong smallincisiondiscectomyforlumbardischerniationin98patientswith5yearfollowuparetrospectivecaseseriesstudy AT chenxin smallincisiondiscectomyforlumbardischerniationin98patientswith5yearfollowuparetrospectivecaseseriesstudy |