Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in People with Type 1 Diabetes Using Carbohydrate Counting: A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Randomised Controlled Trials
INTRODUCTION: Insulin dosing based on carbohydrate counting is the gold standard for improving glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes (T1D). This post hoc analysis aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) according to bolus dose adjustment method in people...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30949906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0608-4 |
_version_ | 1783420860864921600 |
---|---|
author | Rose, Ludger Kadowaki, Takashi Pieber, Thomas R. Buchholtz, Kristine Ekelund, Magnus Gorst-Rasmussen, Anders Philis-Tsimikas, Athena |
author_facet | Rose, Ludger Kadowaki, Takashi Pieber, Thomas R. Buchholtz, Kristine Ekelund, Magnus Gorst-Rasmussen, Anders Philis-Tsimikas, Athena |
author_sort | Rose, Ludger |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Insulin dosing based on carbohydrate counting is the gold standard for improving glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes (T1D). This post hoc analysis aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) according to bolus dose adjustment method in people with T1D. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of two 26-week, treat-to-target, randomised trials investigating treatment with double-blind mealtime faster aspart, insulin aspart (IAsp), or open-label post-meal faster aspart (onset 1, n = 1143; onset 8, n = 1025). Participants with previous experience continued carbohydrate counting (onset 1, n = 669 [58.5%]; onset 8, n = 428 [41.8%]), while remaining participants used a bolus algorithm. RESULTS: In onset 1, HbA1c reduction was statistically significantly in favour of mealtime faster aspart versus IAsp with carbohydrate counting (estimated treatment difference [ETD 95% CI] − 0.19% [− 0.30; − 0.09]; − 2.08 mmol/mol [− 3.23; − 0.93]). In onset 8, there was no statistically significant difference in HbA1c reduction with either dose adjustment method, although a trend towards improved HbA1c was observed for mealtime faster aspart with carbohydrate counting (ETD − 0.14% [− 0.28; 0.003]; − 1.53 mmol/mol [− 3.10; 0.04]). In both trials, bolus insulin doses and overall rates of severe or blood glucose-confirmed hypoglycaemia were similar between treatments across dose adjustment methods. CONCLUSION: For people with T1D using carbohydrate counting, mealtime faster aspart may offer improved glycaemic control versus IAsp, with similar insulin dose and weight gain and no increased risk of hypoglycaemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01831765 (onset 1) and NCT02500706 (onset 8). FUNDING: Novo Nordisk. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-019-0608-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6531584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65315842019-06-07 Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in People with Type 1 Diabetes Using Carbohydrate Counting: A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Randomised Controlled Trials Rose, Ludger Kadowaki, Takashi Pieber, Thomas R. Buchholtz, Kristine Ekelund, Magnus Gorst-Rasmussen, Anders Philis-Tsimikas, Athena Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Insulin dosing based on carbohydrate counting is the gold standard for improving glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes (T1D). This post hoc analysis aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) according to bolus dose adjustment method in people with T1D. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of two 26-week, treat-to-target, randomised trials investigating treatment with double-blind mealtime faster aspart, insulin aspart (IAsp), or open-label post-meal faster aspart (onset 1, n = 1143; onset 8, n = 1025). Participants with previous experience continued carbohydrate counting (onset 1, n = 669 [58.5%]; onset 8, n = 428 [41.8%]), while remaining participants used a bolus algorithm. RESULTS: In onset 1, HbA1c reduction was statistically significantly in favour of mealtime faster aspart versus IAsp with carbohydrate counting (estimated treatment difference [ETD 95% CI] − 0.19% [− 0.30; − 0.09]; − 2.08 mmol/mol [− 3.23; − 0.93]). In onset 8, there was no statistically significant difference in HbA1c reduction with either dose adjustment method, although a trend towards improved HbA1c was observed for mealtime faster aspart with carbohydrate counting (ETD − 0.14% [− 0.28; 0.003]; − 1.53 mmol/mol [− 3.10; 0.04]). In both trials, bolus insulin doses and overall rates of severe or blood glucose-confirmed hypoglycaemia were similar between treatments across dose adjustment methods. CONCLUSION: For people with T1D using carbohydrate counting, mealtime faster aspart may offer improved glycaemic control versus IAsp, with similar insulin dose and weight gain and no increased risk of hypoglycaemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01831765 (onset 1) and NCT02500706 (onset 8). FUNDING: Novo Nordisk. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-019-0608-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2019-04-04 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6531584/ /pubmed/30949906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0608-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Rose, Ludger Kadowaki, Takashi Pieber, Thomas R. Buchholtz, Kristine Ekelund, Magnus Gorst-Rasmussen, Anders Philis-Tsimikas, Athena Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in People with Type 1 Diabetes Using Carbohydrate Counting: A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Randomised Controlled Trials |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in People with Type 1 Diabetes Using Carbohydrate Counting: A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Randomised Controlled Trials |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in People with Type 1 Diabetes Using Carbohydrate Counting: A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Randomised Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in People with Type 1 Diabetes Using Carbohydrate Counting: A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Randomised Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in People with Type 1 Diabetes Using Carbohydrate Counting: A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Randomised Controlled Trials |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in People with Type 1 Diabetes Using Carbohydrate Counting: A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Randomised Controlled Trials |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart in people with type 1 diabetes using carbohydrate counting: a post hoc analysis of two randomised controlled trials |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30949906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0608-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roseludger efficacyandsafetyoffastactinginsulinaspartinpeoplewithtype1diabetesusingcarbohydratecountingaposthocanalysisoftworandomisedcontrolledtrials AT kadowakitakashi efficacyandsafetyoffastactinginsulinaspartinpeoplewithtype1diabetesusingcarbohydratecountingaposthocanalysisoftworandomisedcontrolledtrials AT pieberthomasr efficacyandsafetyoffastactinginsulinaspartinpeoplewithtype1diabetesusingcarbohydratecountingaposthocanalysisoftworandomisedcontrolledtrials AT buchholtzkristine efficacyandsafetyoffastactinginsulinaspartinpeoplewithtype1diabetesusingcarbohydratecountingaposthocanalysisoftworandomisedcontrolledtrials AT ekelundmagnus efficacyandsafetyoffastactinginsulinaspartinpeoplewithtype1diabetesusingcarbohydratecountingaposthocanalysisoftworandomisedcontrolledtrials AT gorstrasmussenanders efficacyandsafetyoffastactinginsulinaspartinpeoplewithtype1diabetesusingcarbohydratecountingaposthocanalysisoftworandomisedcontrolledtrials AT philistsimikasathena efficacyandsafetyoffastactinginsulinaspartinpeoplewithtype1diabetesusingcarbohydratecountingaposthocanalysisoftworandomisedcontrolledtrials |