Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in People with Type 1 Diabetes Using Carbohydrate Counting: A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Randomised Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION: Insulin dosing based on carbohydrate counting is the gold standard for improving glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes (T1D). This post hoc analysis aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) according to bolus dose adjustment method in people...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rose, Ludger, Kadowaki, Takashi, Pieber, Thomas R., Buchholtz, Kristine, Ekelund, Magnus, Gorst-Rasmussen, Anders, Philis-Tsimikas, Athena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30949906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0608-4
_version_ 1783420860864921600
author Rose, Ludger
Kadowaki, Takashi
Pieber, Thomas R.
Buchholtz, Kristine
Ekelund, Magnus
Gorst-Rasmussen, Anders
Philis-Tsimikas, Athena
author_facet Rose, Ludger
Kadowaki, Takashi
Pieber, Thomas R.
Buchholtz, Kristine
Ekelund, Magnus
Gorst-Rasmussen, Anders
Philis-Tsimikas, Athena
author_sort Rose, Ludger
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Insulin dosing based on carbohydrate counting is the gold standard for improving glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes (T1D). This post hoc analysis aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) according to bolus dose adjustment method in people with T1D. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of two 26-week, treat-to-target, randomised trials investigating treatment with double-blind mealtime faster aspart, insulin aspart (IAsp), or open-label post-meal faster aspart (onset 1, n = 1143; onset 8, n = 1025). Participants with previous experience continued carbohydrate counting (onset 1, n = 669 [58.5%]; onset 8, n = 428 [41.8%]), while remaining participants used a bolus algorithm. RESULTS: In onset 1, HbA1c reduction was statistically significantly in favour of mealtime faster aspart versus IAsp with carbohydrate counting (estimated treatment difference [ETD 95% CI] − 0.19% [− 0.30; − 0.09]; − 2.08 mmol/mol [− 3.23; − 0.93]). In onset 8, there was no statistically significant difference in HbA1c reduction with either dose adjustment method, although a trend towards improved HbA1c was observed for mealtime faster aspart with carbohydrate counting (ETD − 0.14% [− 0.28; 0.003]; − 1.53 mmol/mol [− 3.10; 0.04]). In both trials, bolus insulin doses and overall rates of severe or blood glucose-confirmed hypoglycaemia were similar between treatments across dose adjustment methods. CONCLUSION: For people with T1D using carbohydrate counting, mealtime faster aspart may offer improved glycaemic control versus IAsp, with similar insulin dose and weight gain and no increased risk of hypoglycaemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01831765 (onset 1) and NCT02500706 (onset 8). FUNDING: Novo Nordisk. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-019-0608-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6531584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65315842019-06-07 Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in People with Type 1 Diabetes Using Carbohydrate Counting: A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Randomised Controlled Trials Rose, Ludger Kadowaki, Takashi Pieber, Thomas R. Buchholtz, Kristine Ekelund, Magnus Gorst-Rasmussen, Anders Philis-Tsimikas, Athena Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Insulin dosing based on carbohydrate counting is the gold standard for improving glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes (T1D). This post hoc analysis aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) according to bolus dose adjustment method in people with T1D. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of two 26-week, treat-to-target, randomised trials investigating treatment with double-blind mealtime faster aspart, insulin aspart (IAsp), or open-label post-meal faster aspart (onset 1, n = 1143; onset 8, n = 1025). Participants with previous experience continued carbohydrate counting (onset 1, n = 669 [58.5%]; onset 8, n = 428 [41.8%]), while remaining participants used a bolus algorithm. RESULTS: In onset 1, HbA1c reduction was statistically significantly in favour of mealtime faster aspart versus IAsp with carbohydrate counting (estimated treatment difference [ETD 95% CI] − 0.19% [− 0.30; − 0.09]; − 2.08 mmol/mol [− 3.23; − 0.93]). In onset 8, there was no statistically significant difference in HbA1c reduction with either dose adjustment method, although a trend towards improved HbA1c was observed for mealtime faster aspart with carbohydrate counting (ETD − 0.14% [− 0.28; 0.003]; − 1.53 mmol/mol [− 3.10; 0.04]). In both trials, bolus insulin doses and overall rates of severe or blood glucose-confirmed hypoglycaemia were similar between treatments across dose adjustment methods. CONCLUSION: For people with T1D using carbohydrate counting, mealtime faster aspart may offer improved glycaemic control versus IAsp, with similar insulin dose and weight gain and no increased risk of hypoglycaemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01831765 (onset 1) and NCT02500706 (onset 8). FUNDING: Novo Nordisk. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-019-0608-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2019-04-04 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6531584/ /pubmed/30949906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0608-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Rose, Ludger
Kadowaki, Takashi
Pieber, Thomas R.
Buchholtz, Kristine
Ekelund, Magnus
Gorst-Rasmussen, Anders
Philis-Tsimikas, Athena
Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in People with Type 1 Diabetes Using Carbohydrate Counting: A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Randomised Controlled Trials
title Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in People with Type 1 Diabetes Using Carbohydrate Counting: A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Randomised Controlled Trials
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in People with Type 1 Diabetes Using Carbohydrate Counting: A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Randomised Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in People with Type 1 Diabetes Using Carbohydrate Counting: A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Randomised Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in People with Type 1 Diabetes Using Carbohydrate Counting: A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Randomised Controlled Trials
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in People with Type 1 Diabetes Using Carbohydrate Counting: A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Randomised Controlled Trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart in people with type 1 diabetes using carbohydrate counting: a post hoc analysis of two randomised controlled trials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30949906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0608-4
work_keys_str_mv AT roseludger efficacyandsafetyoffastactinginsulinaspartinpeoplewithtype1diabetesusingcarbohydratecountingaposthocanalysisoftworandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT kadowakitakashi efficacyandsafetyoffastactinginsulinaspartinpeoplewithtype1diabetesusingcarbohydratecountingaposthocanalysisoftworandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT pieberthomasr efficacyandsafetyoffastactinginsulinaspartinpeoplewithtype1diabetesusingcarbohydratecountingaposthocanalysisoftworandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT buchholtzkristine efficacyandsafetyoffastactinginsulinaspartinpeoplewithtype1diabetesusingcarbohydratecountingaposthocanalysisoftworandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT ekelundmagnus efficacyandsafetyoffastactinginsulinaspartinpeoplewithtype1diabetesusingcarbohydratecountingaposthocanalysisoftworandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT gorstrasmussenanders efficacyandsafetyoffastactinginsulinaspartinpeoplewithtype1diabetesusingcarbohydratecountingaposthocanalysisoftworandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT philistsimikasathena efficacyandsafetyoffastactinginsulinaspartinpeoplewithtype1diabetesusingcarbohydratecountingaposthocanalysisoftworandomisedcontrolledtrials