Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Basal Analog Regimens in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION: This study compared basal analog (BA: glargine U100/mL and detemir) and premix (PM: human, lispro and aspart biphasic) insulin regimens in terms of their efficacy and safety in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. METHODS: Searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL identified primary rando...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Ting, Lu, Jing, Zhang, Pengzi, Zhang, Zhou, Xu, Qianyue, Li, Yunguang, Cui, Nan, Grijalva, Ambar, Murray, Erin M., del Aguila, Michael A., Bi, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30955140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0606-6
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: This study compared basal analog (BA: glargine U100/mL and detemir) and premix (PM: human, lispro and aspart biphasic) insulin regimens in terms of their efficacy and safety in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. METHODS: Searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL identified primary randomized controlled trials (RCTs) ≥ 12 weeks in duration that compared BA or PM insulin regimens in adults with T2DM, with ≥ 30 patients per arm. A systematic literature review and a pairwise meta-analysis were performed using a random effects model adjusted for between-study variability. Analyses were conducted based on frequency of bolus insulin and PM injections, PM ratio and type, BA type, race, follow-up period, and baseline glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). RESULTS: Twenty-two primary RCTs with 9691 patients were included. The BA and PM regimens yielded similar changes in HbA1c and postprandial glucose levels, with a statistically significant reduction in fasting glucose [mean difference (MD) − 0.61 mmol/L (95% confidence interval (CI) − 0.90, − 0.32), I(2) = 89.6%]. The BA regimens showed significantly reduced rates of total hypoglycemia [odds ratio (OR) 0.77 (95% CI 0.64, 0.92), I(2) = 65.3%] and changes in body weight [MD − 0.48 kg (95% CI − 0.86, − 0.11), I(2) = 75.7%] compared to PM regimens. Stratification by PM type and dosing ratio demonstrated statistically significant reductions in HbA1c favoring BA compared to human [MD − 0.39% (95% CI − 0.60, − 0.18), I(2) = 61.8%] or 50/50-ratio [MD − 0.22% (95% CI − 0.40, − 0.04), I(2) = 0.0%] PM regimens. Other subgroup analyses found no difference in HbA1c change between the BA and PM regimens. CONCLUSION: When compared to PM regimens, BA regimens yielded similar efficacies and better safety profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. FUNDING: Sanofi (Shanghai, China). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-019-0606-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.