Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Basal Analog Regimens in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
INTRODUCTION: This study compared basal analog (BA: glargine U100/mL and detemir) and premix (PM: human, lispro and aspart biphasic) insulin regimens in terms of their efficacy and safety in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. METHODS: Searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL identified primary rando...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30955140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0606-6 |
_version_ | 1783420861194174464 |
---|---|
author | Hong, Ting Lu, Jing Zhang, Pengzi Zhang, Zhou Xu, Qianyue Li, Yunguang Cui, Nan Grijalva, Ambar Murray, Erin M. del Aguila, Michael A. Bi, Yan |
author_facet | Hong, Ting Lu, Jing Zhang, Pengzi Zhang, Zhou Xu, Qianyue Li, Yunguang Cui, Nan Grijalva, Ambar Murray, Erin M. del Aguila, Michael A. Bi, Yan |
author_sort | Hong, Ting |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This study compared basal analog (BA: glargine U100/mL and detemir) and premix (PM: human, lispro and aspart biphasic) insulin regimens in terms of their efficacy and safety in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. METHODS: Searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL identified primary randomized controlled trials (RCTs) ≥ 12 weeks in duration that compared BA or PM insulin regimens in adults with T2DM, with ≥ 30 patients per arm. A systematic literature review and a pairwise meta-analysis were performed using a random effects model adjusted for between-study variability. Analyses were conducted based on frequency of bolus insulin and PM injections, PM ratio and type, BA type, race, follow-up period, and baseline glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). RESULTS: Twenty-two primary RCTs with 9691 patients were included. The BA and PM regimens yielded similar changes in HbA1c and postprandial glucose levels, with a statistically significant reduction in fasting glucose [mean difference (MD) − 0.61 mmol/L (95% confidence interval (CI) − 0.90, − 0.32), I(2) = 89.6%]. The BA regimens showed significantly reduced rates of total hypoglycemia [odds ratio (OR) 0.77 (95% CI 0.64, 0.92), I(2) = 65.3%] and changes in body weight [MD − 0.48 kg (95% CI − 0.86, − 0.11), I(2) = 75.7%] compared to PM regimens. Stratification by PM type and dosing ratio demonstrated statistically significant reductions in HbA1c favoring BA compared to human [MD − 0.39% (95% CI − 0.60, − 0.18), I(2) = 61.8%] or 50/50-ratio [MD − 0.22% (95% CI − 0.40, − 0.04), I(2) = 0.0%] PM regimens. Other subgroup analyses found no difference in HbA1c change between the BA and PM regimens. CONCLUSION: When compared to PM regimens, BA regimens yielded similar efficacies and better safety profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. FUNDING: Sanofi (Shanghai, China). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-019-0606-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6531585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65315852019-06-07 Efficacy and Safety of Basal Analog Regimens in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Hong, Ting Lu, Jing Zhang, Pengzi Zhang, Zhou Xu, Qianyue Li, Yunguang Cui, Nan Grijalva, Ambar Murray, Erin M. del Aguila, Michael A. Bi, Yan Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: This study compared basal analog (BA: glargine U100/mL and detemir) and premix (PM: human, lispro and aspart biphasic) insulin regimens in terms of their efficacy and safety in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. METHODS: Searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL identified primary randomized controlled trials (RCTs) ≥ 12 weeks in duration that compared BA or PM insulin regimens in adults with T2DM, with ≥ 30 patients per arm. A systematic literature review and a pairwise meta-analysis were performed using a random effects model adjusted for between-study variability. Analyses were conducted based on frequency of bolus insulin and PM injections, PM ratio and type, BA type, race, follow-up period, and baseline glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). RESULTS: Twenty-two primary RCTs with 9691 patients were included. The BA and PM regimens yielded similar changes in HbA1c and postprandial glucose levels, with a statistically significant reduction in fasting glucose [mean difference (MD) − 0.61 mmol/L (95% confidence interval (CI) − 0.90, − 0.32), I(2) = 89.6%]. The BA regimens showed significantly reduced rates of total hypoglycemia [odds ratio (OR) 0.77 (95% CI 0.64, 0.92), I(2) = 65.3%] and changes in body weight [MD − 0.48 kg (95% CI − 0.86, − 0.11), I(2) = 75.7%] compared to PM regimens. Stratification by PM type and dosing ratio demonstrated statistically significant reductions in HbA1c favoring BA compared to human [MD − 0.39% (95% CI − 0.60, − 0.18), I(2) = 61.8%] or 50/50-ratio [MD − 0.22% (95% CI − 0.40, − 0.04), I(2) = 0.0%] PM regimens. Other subgroup analyses found no difference in HbA1c change between the BA and PM regimens. CONCLUSION: When compared to PM regimens, BA regimens yielded similar efficacies and better safety profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. FUNDING: Sanofi (Shanghai, China). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-019-0606-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2019-04-06 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6531585/ /pubmed/30955140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0606-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hong, Ting Lu, Jing Zhang, Pengzi Zhang, Zhou Xu, Qianyue Li, Yunguang Cui, Nan Grijalva, Ambar Murray, Erin M. del Aguila, Michael A. Bi, Yan Efficacy and Safety of Basal Analog Regimens in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Basal Analog Regimens in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Basal Analog Regimens in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Basal Analog Regimens in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Basal Analog Regimens in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Basal Analog Regimens in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of basal analog regimens in type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30955140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0606-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hongting efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT lujing efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhangpengzi efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhangzhou efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT xuqianyue efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liyunguang efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT cuinan efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT grijalvaambar efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT murrayerinm efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT delaguilamichaela efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT biyan efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |