Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Basal Analog Regimens in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION: This study compared basal analog (BA: glargine U100/mL and detemir) and premix (PM: human, lispro and aspart biphasic) insulin regimens in terms of their efficacy and safety in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. METHODS: Searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL identified primary rando...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Ting, Lu, Jing, Zhang, Pengzi, Zhang, Zhou, Xu, Qianyue, Li, Yunguang, Cui, Nan, Grijalva, Ambar, Murray, Erin M., del Aguila, Michael A., Bi, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30955140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0606-6
_version_ 1783420861194174464
author Hong, Ting
Lu, Jing
Zhang, Pengzi
Zhang, Zhou
Xu, Qianyue
Li, Yunguang
Cui, Nan
Grijalva, Ambar
Murray, Erin M.
del Aguila, Michael A.
Bi, Yan
author_facet Hong, Ting
Lu, Jing
Zhang, Pengzi
Zhang, Zhou
Xu, Qianyue
Li, Yunguang
Cui, Nan
Grijalva, Ambar
Murray, Erin M.
del Aguila, Michael A.
Bi, Yan
author_sort Hong, Ting
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study compared basal analog (BA: glargine U100/mL and detemir) and premix (PM: human, lispro and aspart biphasic) insulin regimens in terms of their efficacy and safety in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. METHODS: Searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL identified primary randomized controlled trials (RCTs) ≥ 12 weeks in duration that compared BA or PM insulin regimens in adults with T2DM, with ≥ 30 patients per arm. A systematic literature review and a pairwise meta-analysis were performed using a random effects model adjusted for between-study variability. Analyses were conducted based on frequency of bolus insulin and PM injections, PM ratio and type, BA type, race, follow-up period, and baseline glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). RESULTS: Twenty-two primary RCTs with 9691 patients were included. The BA and PM regimens yielded similar changes in HbA1c and postprandial glucose levels, with a statistically significant reduction in fasting glucose [mean difference (MD) − 0.61 mmol/L (95% confidence interval (CI) − 0.90, − 0.32), I(2) = 89.6%]. The BA regimens showed significantly reduced rates of total hypoglycemia [odds ratio (OR) 0.77 (95% CI 0.64, 0.92), I(2) = 65.3%] and changes in body weight [MD − 0.48 kg (95% CI − 0.86, − 0.11), I(2) = 75.7%] compared to PM regimens. Stratification by PM type and dosing ratio demonstrated statistically significant reductions in HbA1c favoring BA compared to human [MD − 0.39% (95% CI − 0.60, − 0.18), I(2) = 61.8%] or 50/50-ratio [MD − 0.22% (95% CI − 0.40, − 0.04), I(2) = 0.0%] PM regimens. Other subgroup analyses found no difference in HbA1c change between the BA and PM regimens. CONCLUSION: When compared to PM regimens, BA regimens yielded similar efficacies and better safety profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. FUNDING: Sanofi (Shanghai, China). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-019-0606-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6531585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65315852019-06-07 Efficacy and Safety of Basal Analog Regimens in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Hong, Ting Lu, Jing Zhang, Pengzi Zhang, Zhou Xu, Qianyue Li, Yunguang Cui, Nan Grijalva, Ambar Murray, Erin M. del Aguila, Michael A. Bi, Yan Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: This study compared basal analog (BA: glargine U100/mL and detemir) and premix (PM: human, lispro and aspart biphasic) insulin regimens in terms of their efficacy and safety in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. METHODS: Searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL identified primary randomized controlled trials (RCTs) ≥ 12 weeks in duration that compared BA or PM insulin regimens in adults with T2DM, with ≥ 30 patients per arm. A systematic literature review and a pairwise meta-analysis were performed using a random effects model adjusted for between-study variability. Analyses were conducted based on frequency of bolus insulin and PM injections, PM ratio and type, BA type, race, follow-up period, and baseline glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). RESULTS: Twenty-two primary RCTs with 9691 patients were included. The BA and PM regimens yielded similar changes in HbA1c and postprandial glucose levels, with a statistically significant reduction in fasting glucose [mean difference (MD) − 0.61 mmol/L (95% confidence interval (CI) − 0.90, − 0.32), I(2) = 89.6%]. The BA regimens showed significantly reduced rates of total hypoglycemia [odds ratio (OR) 0.77 (95% CI 0.64, 0.92), I(2) = 65.3%] and changes in body weight [MD − 0.48 kg (95% CI − 0.86, − 0.11), I(2) = 75.7%] compared to PM regimens. Stratification by PM type and dosing ratio demonstrated statistically significant reductions in HbA1c favoring BA compared to human [MD − 0.39% (95% CI − 0.60, − 0.18), I(2) = 61.8%] or 50/50-ratio [MD − 0.22% (95% CI − 0.40, − 0.04), I(2) = 0.0%] PM regimens. Other subgroup analyses found no difference in HbA1c change between the BA and PM regimens. CONCLUSION: When compared to PM regimens, BA regimens yielded similar efficacies and better safety profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. FUNDING: Sanofi (Shanghai, China). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-019-0606-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2019-04-06 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6531585/ /pubmed/30955140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0606-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hong, Ting
Lu, Jing
Zhang, Pengzi
Zhang, Zhou
Xu, Qianyue
Li, Yunguang
Cui, Nan
Grijalva, Ambar
Murray, Erin M.
del Aguila, Michael A.
Bi, Yan
Efficacy and Safety of Basal Analog Regimens in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Efficacy and Safety of Basal Analog Regimens in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Basal Analog Regimens in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Basal Analog Regimens in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Basal Analog Regimens in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Basal Analog Regimens in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of basal analog regimens in type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30955140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0606-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hongting efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lujing efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangpengzi efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangzhou efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xuqianyue efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liyunguang efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT cuinan efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT grijalvaambar efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT murrayerinm efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT delaguilamichaela efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT biyan efficacyandsafetyofbasalanalogregimensintype2diabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials