Cargando…

Study Protocol for the Effects of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Supported Automated Nutritional Intervention on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

INTRODUCTION: Nutritional intervention is effective in improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes but requires large inputs of manpower. Recent improvements in photo analysis technology facilitated by artificial intelligence (AI) and remote communication technologies have enabled au...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oka, Rie, Nomura, Akihiro, Yasugi, Ayaka, Kometani, Mitsuhiro, Gondoh, Yuko, Yoshimura, Kenichi, Yoneda, Takashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30877556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0595-5
_version_ 1783420861912449024
author Oka, Rie
Nomura, Akihiro
Yasugi, Ayaka
Kometani, Mitsuhiro
Gondoh, Yuko
Yoshimura, Kenichi
Yoneda, Takashi
author_facet Oka, Rie
Nomura, Akihiro
Yasugi, Ayaka
Kometani, Mitsuhiro
Gondoh, Yuko
Yoshimura, Kenichi
Yoneda, Takashi
author_sort Oka, Rie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Nutritional intervention is effective in improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes but requires large inputs of manpower. Recent improvements in photo analysis technology facilitated by artificial intelligence (AI) and remote communication technologies have enabled automated evaluations of nutrient intakes. AI- and mobile-supported nutritional intervention is expected to be an alternative approach to conventional in-person nutritional intervention, but with less human resources, although supporting evidence is not yet complete. The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that AI-supported nutritional intervention is as efficacious as the in-person, face-to-face method in terms of improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This is a multicenter, unblinded, parallel, randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of AI-supported automated nutrition therapy with that of conventional human nutrition therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients with type 2 diabetes mainly controlled with diet are to be recruited and randomly assigned to AI-supported nutrition therapy (n = 50) and to human nutrition therapy (n = 50). Asken, a mobile application whose nutritional evaluation has been already validated to that by the classical method of weighted dietary records, has been specially modified for this study so that it follows the recommendations of Japan Diabetes Society (total energy restriction with proportion of carbohydrates to fat to protein of 50–60, 20, and 20–30%, respectively). PLANNED OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is the change in glycated hemoglobin levels from baseline to 12 months, and this outcome is to be compared between the two groups. The secondary outcomes are changes in fasting plasma glucose, plasma lipid profile, body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressures, and urinary albumin excretion. The results of this randomized controlled trial will fill the gap between the demand for support of AI in nutritional interventions and the scientific evidence on its efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000032231.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6531593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65315932019-06-07 Study Protocol for the Effects of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Supported Automated Nutritional Intervention on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Oka, Rie Nomura, Akihiro Yasugi, Ayaka Kometani, Mitsuhiro Gondoh, Yuko Yoshimura, Kenichi Yoneda, Takashi Diabetes Ther Study Protocol INTRODUCTION: Nutritional intervention is effective in improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes but requires large inputs of manpower. Recent improvements in photo analysis technology facilitated by artificial intelligence (AI) and remote communication technologies have enabled automated evaluations of nutrient intakes. AI- and mobile-supported nutritional intervention is expected to be an alternative approach to conventional in-person nutritional intervention, but with less human resources, although supporting evidence is not yet complete. The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that AI-supported nutritional intervention is as efficacious as the in-person, face-to-face method in terms of improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This is a multicenter, unblinded, parallel, randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of AI-supported automated nutrition therapy with that of conventional human nutrition therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients with type 2 diabetes mainly controlled with diet are to be recruited and randomly assigned to AI-supported nutrition therapy (n = 50) and to human nutrition therapy (n = 50). Asken, a mobile application whose nutritional evaluation has been already validated to that by the classical method of weighted dietary records, has been specially modified for this study so that it follows the recommendations of Japan Diabetes Society (total energy restriction with proportion of carbohydrates to fat to protein of 50–60, 20, and 20–30%, respectively). PLANNED OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is the change in glycated hemoglobin levels from baseline to 12 months, and this outcome is to be compared between the two groups. The secondary outcomes are changes in fasting plasma glucose, plasma lipid profile, body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressures, and urinary albumin excretion. The results of this randomized controlled trial will fill the gap between the demand for support of AI in nutritional interventions and the scientific evidence on its efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000032231. Springer Healthcare 2019-03-15 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6531593/ /pubmed/30877556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0595-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Oka, Rie
Nomura, Akihiro
Yasugi, Ayaka
Kometani, Mitsuhiro
Gondoh, Yuko
Yoshimura, Kenichi
Yoneda, Takashi
Study Protocol for the Effects of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Supported Automated Nutritional Intervention on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
title Study Protocol for the Effects of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Supported Automated Nutritional Intervention on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
title_full Study Protocol for the Effects of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Supported Automated Nutritional Intervention on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
title_fullStr Study Protocol for the Effects of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Supported Automated Nutritional Intervention on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
title_full_unstemmed Study Protocol for the Effects of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Supported Automated Nutritional Intervention on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
title_short Study Protocol for the Effects of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Supported Automated Nutritional Intervention on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
title_sort study protocol for the effects of artificial intelligence (ai)-supported automated nutritional intervention on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30877556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0595-5
work_keys_str_mv AT okarie studyprotocolfortheeffectsofartificialintelligenceaisupportedautomatednutritionalinterventiononglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT nomuraakihiro studyprotocolfortheeffectsofartificialintelligenceaisupportedautomatednutritionalinterventiononglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT yasugiayaka studyprotocolfortheeffectsofartificialintelligenceaisupportedautomatednutritionalinterventiononglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT kometanimitsuhiro studyprotocolfortheeffectsofartificialintelligenceaisupportedautomatednutritionalinterventiononglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT gondohyuko studyprotocolfortheeffectsofartificialintelligenceaisupportedautomatednutritionalinterventiononglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT yoshimurakenichi studyprotocolfortheeffectsofartificialintelligenceaisupportedautomatednutritionalinterventiononglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT yonedatakashi studyprotocolfortheeffectsofartificialintelligenceaisupportedautomatednutritionalinterventiononglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus