Cargando…

The effect of corneal cross-linking on the anterior and posterior parameters of the cornea: A prospective repeatability study

Objective. To determine the effect of corneal cross-linking (CXL) on the anterior and posterior corneal indices in terms of their repeatability and change as measured with Pentacam. Methods. Thirty eyes of 30 patients with progressive keratoconus undergoing CXL were enrolled. At each visit (pre-CXL,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hashemi, Hassan, Mehravaran, Shiva, Asgari, Soheila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Romanian Society of Ophthalmology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31198900
Descripción
Sumario:Objective. To determine the effect of corneal cross-linking (CXL) on the anterior and posterior corneal indices in terms of their repeatability and change as measured with Pentacam. Methods. Thirty eyes of 30 patients with progressive keratoconus undergoing CXL were enrolled. At each visit (pre-CXL, 6 and 12 months after CXL), imaging were done twice, one hour apart to determine the repeatability index (RI) and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). For same session measurements, we computed the intra-session repeatability. We also calculated 4 measures of change by subtracting baseline from 1-year results and determined the repeatability of measures of change. Results. There was no significant difference between the intra-session RI at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months for anterior Kmax-3mm (P=0.609), anterior Kmin-3mm (P=0.548), Kmax-8mm (P=0.860), posterior Kmax-3mm (P=0.717), posterior Kmin-3mm (P=0.548), Q-value-6mm (P=0.890), central corneal thickness (P=0.751), minimum corneal thickness (P=0.787), or anterior chamber depth (P=0.760). The ICCs for these indices were higher than 0.9. For keratoconus indices, there was no significant difference between the intra-session RI at baseline and follow-ups (P>0.05), and the ICC were higher than 0.9 except for baseline and 6-month index of height asymmetry (IHA). The ICC for all 1-year measures of change were more than 0.75 except for posterior corneal indices and IHA. Conclusion. Pentacam repeatability of different indices is not affected by CXL. However, the change of indices showed high variance, which should be taken into consideration, especially in systematic reviews because inter-study differences can be due to low repeatability of the measures of change.