Cargando…
Is prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molar justified in all patients? A prospective clinical study of patients 50 years and above
BACKGROUND: The prophylactic extraction of asymptomatic impacted mandibular third molar is a contentious issue in dental practice. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate symptomatic impacted mandibular third molars in patients 50 years and above, and determine the burden of the impaction on the adjacent second mola...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Makerere Medical School
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31149009 http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v19i1.55 |
_version_ | 1783420922992001024 |
---|---|
author | Anyanechi, Charles E Saheeb, Birch D Okechi, Uchenna C |
author_facet | Anyanechi, Charles E Saheeb, Birch D Okechi, Uchenna C |
author_sort | Anyanechi, Charles E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The prophylactic extraction of asymptomatic impacted mandibular third molar is a contentious issue in dental practice. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate symptomatic impacted mandibular third molars in patients 50 years and above, and determine the burden of the impaction on the adjacent second molar. METHODS: This was a prospective clinical study over a three-year period. The diagnosis of impacted mandibular third molar and their associated pathology was made by clinical and radiological examination. The data obtained were age, sex, type of impaction, reason for surgical extraction, and the clinical condition of the adjacent second molar. RESULTS: Patients 50 years and above were 33.4%, and those with impaction 22.8%, while the symptomatic cases were in 18.4% patients. The age of the patients ranged from 52 to 84 years with male: female ratio, 2.3:1. In all the asymptomatic impactions, the adjacent second molars were disease-free, whereas 73.6% of the adjacent second molar related to symptomatic cases were asymptomatic (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: This study showed that 15.9% of impactions in 18.4% of patients were symptomatic and required surgical extraction, whereas the burden of impaction on the adjacent second molar was 26.4%, and these required only preventive and restorative treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6531985 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Makerere Medical School |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65319852019-05-30 Is prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molar justified in all patients? A prospective clinical study of patients 50 years and above Anyanechi, Charles E Saheeb, Birch D Okechi, Uchenna C Afr Health Sci Articles BACKGROUND: The prophylactic extraction of asymptomatic impacted mandibular third molar is a contentious issue in dental practice. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate symptomatic impacted mandibular third molars in patients 50 years and above, and determine the burden of the impaction on the adjacent second molar. METHODS: This was a prospective clinical study over a three-year period. The diagnosis of impacted mandibular third molar and their associated pathology was made by clinical and radiological examination. The data obtained were age, sex, type of impaction, reason for surgical extraction, and the clinical condition of the adjacent second molar. RESULTS: Patients 50 years and above were 33.4%, and those with impaction 22.8%, while the symptomatic cases were in 18.4% patients. The age of the patients ranged from 52 to 84 years with male: female ratio, 2.3:1. In all the asymptomatic impactions, the adjacent second molars were disease-free, whereas 73.6% of the adjacent second molar related to symptomatic cases were asymptomatic (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: This study showed that 15.9% of impactions in 18.4% of patients were symptomatic and required surgical extraction, whereas the burden of impaction on the adjacent second molar was 26.4%, and these required only preventive and restorative treatments. Makerere Medical School 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6531985/ /pubmed/31149009 http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v19i1.55 Text en © 2019 Anyanechi et al. Licensee African Health Sciences. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Anyanechi, Charles E Saheeb, Birch D Okechi, Uchenna C Is prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molar justified in all patients? A prospective clinical study of patients 50 years and above |
title | Is prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molar justified in all patients? A prospective clinical study of patients 50 years and above |
title_full | Is prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molar justified in all patients? A prospective clinical study of patients 50 years and above |
title_fullStr | Is prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molar justified in all patients? A prospective clinical study of patients 50 years and above |
title_full_unstemmed | Is prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molar justified in all patients? A prospective clinical study of patients 50 years and above |
title_short | Is prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molar justified in all patients? A prospective clinical study of patients 50 years and above |
title_sort | is prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molar justified in all patients? a prospective clinical study of patients 50 years and above |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6531985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31149009 http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v19i1.55 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anyanechicharlese isprophylacticremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolarjustifiedinallpatientsaprospectiveclinicalstudyofpatients50yearsandabove AT saheebbirchd isprophylacticremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolarjustifiedinallpatientsaprospectiveclinicalstudyofpatients50yearsandabove AT okechiuchennac isprophylacticremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolarjustifiedinallpatientsaprospectiveclinicalstudyofpatients50yearsandabove |