Cargando…

Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care

ABSTRACT: Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care. BACKGROUND: Since there is no consensus regarding the optimal management in late-term pregnancies (≥41.0 weeks), we explored the variety of management strategies in late-term pregnancy in the Netherlands to identify...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kortekaas, Joep C., Bruinsma, Aafke, Keulen, Judit K. J., Vandenbussche, Frank P.H.A., van Dillen, Jeroen, de Miranda, Esteriek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31117985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2294-7
_version_ 1783420961723252736
author Kortekaas, Joep C.
Bruinsma, Aafke
Keulen, Judit K. J.
Vandenbussche, Frank P.H.A.
van Dillen, Jeroen
de Miranda, Esteriek
author_facet Kortekaas, Joep C.
Bruinsma, Aafke
Keulen, Judit K. J.
Vandenbussche, Frank P.H.A.
van Dillen, Jeroen
de Miranda, Esteriek
author_sort Kortekaas, Joep C.
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care. BACKGROUND: Since there is no consensus regarding the optimal management in late-term pregnancies (≥41.0 weeks), we explored the variety of management strategies in late-term pregnancy in the Netherlands to identify the magnitude of this variety and the attitude towards late-term pregnancy. METHODS: Two nationwide surveys amongst all midwifery practices (midwifery-led care) and all hospitals with an obstetric unit (obstetrician-led care) were performed with questions on timing, frequency and content of consultations/surveillance in late-term pregnancy and on timing of induction. Propositions about late-term pregnancy were assessed using Likert scale questions. RESULTS: The response rate was 40% (203/511) in midwifery-led care and 92% (80/87) in obstetrician-led care. All obstetric units made regional protocols with their collaborating midwifery practices about management in late-term pregnancy. Most midwifery-led care practices (93%) refer low-risk women at least once for consultation in obstetrician-led care in late-term pregnancy. The content of consultations varies among hospitals. Membrane sweeping is performed more in midwifery-led care compared to obstetrician-led care (90% vs 31%, p < 0.001). Consultation at 41 weeks should be standard care according to 47% of midwifery-led care practices and 83% of obstetrician-led care units (p < 0.001). Induction of labour at 41.0 weeks is offered less often to women in midwifery-led care in comparison to obstetrician-led care (3% vs 21%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial practice variation exists within and between midwifery-and obstetrician-led care in the Netherlands regarding timing, frequency and content of antenatal monitoring in late-term pregnancy and timing of labour induction. An evidence based interdisciplinary guideline will contribute to a higher level of uniformity in the management in late- term pregnancies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2294-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6532173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65321732019-05-28 Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care Kortekaas, Joep C. Bruinsma, Aafke Keulen, Judit K. J. Vandenbussche, Frank P.H.A. van Dillen, Jeroen de Miranda, Esteriek BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article ABSTRACT: Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care. BACKGROUND: Since there is no consensus regarding the optimal management in late-term pregnancies (≥41.0 weeks), we explored the variety of management strategies in late-term pregnancy in the Netherlands to identify the magnitude of this variety and the attitude towards late-term pregnancy. METHODS: Two nationwide surveys amongst all midwifery practices (midwifery-led care) and all hospitals with an obstetric unit (obstetrician-led care) were performed with questions on timing, frequency and content of consultations/surveillance in late-term pregnancy and on timing of induction. Propositions about late-term pregnancy were assessed using Likert scale questions. RESULTS: The response rate was 40% (203/511) in midwifery-led care and 92% (80/87) in obstetrician-led care. All obstetric units made regional protocols with their collaborating midwifery practices about management in late-term pregnancy. Most midwifery-led care practices (93%) refer low-risk women at least once for consultation in obstetrician-led care in late-term pregnancy. The content of consultations varies among hospitals. Membrane sweeping is performed more in midwifery-led care compared to obstetrician-led care (90% vs 31%, p < 0.001). Consultation at 41 weeks should be standard care according to 47% of midwifery-led care practices and 83% of obstetrician-led care units (p < 0.001). Induction of labour at 41.0 weeks is offered less often to women in midwifery-led care in comparison to obstetrician-led care (3% vs 21%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial practice variation exists within and between midwifery-and obstetrician-led care in the Netherlands regarding timing, frequency and content of antenatal monitoring in late-term pregnancy and timing of labour induction. An evidence based interdisciplinary guideline will contribute to a higher level of uniformity in the management in late- term pregnancies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2294-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6532173/ /pubmed/31117985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2294-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kortekaas, Joep C.
Bruinsma, Aafke
Keulen, Judit K. J.
Vandenbussche, Frank P.H.A.
van Dillen, Jeroen
de Miranda, Esteriek
Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care
title Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care
title_full Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care
title_fullStr Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care
title_full_unstemmed Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care
title_short Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care
title_sort management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31117985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2294-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kortekaasjoepc managementoflatetermpregnancyinmidwiferyandobstetricianledcare
AT bruinsmaaafke managementoflatetermpregnancyinmidwiferyandobstetricianledcare
AT keulenjuditkj managementoflatetermpregnancyinmidwiferyandobstetricianledcare
AT vandenbusschefrankpha managementoflatetermpregnancyinmidwiferyandobstetricianledcare
AT vandillenjeroen managementoflatetermpregnancyinmidwiferyandobstetricianledcare
AT demirandaesteriek managementoflatetermpregnancyinmidwiferyandobstetricianledcare