Cargando…
Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care
ABSTRACT: Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care. BACKGROUND: Since there is no consensus regarding the optimal management in late-term pregnancies (≥41.0 weeks), we explored the variety of management strategies in late-term pregnancy in the Netherlands to identify...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31117985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2294-7 |
_version_ | 1783420961723252736 |
---|---|
author | Kortekaas, Joep C. Bruinsma, Aafke Keulen, Judit K. J. Vandenbussche, Frank P.H.A. van Dillen, Jeroen de Miranda, Esteriek |
author_facet | Kortekaas, Joep C. Bruinsma, Aafke Keulen, Judit K. J. Vandenbussche, Frank P.H.A. van Dillen, Jeroen de Miranda, Esteriek |
author_sort | Kortekaas, Joep C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care. BACKGROUND: Since there is no consensus regarding the optimal management in late-term pregnancies (≥41.0 weeks), we explored the variety of management strategies in late-term pregnancy in the Netherlands to identify the magnitude of this variety and the attitude towards late-term pregnancy. METHODS: Two nationwide surveys amongst all midwifery practices (midwifery-led care) and all hospitals with an obstetric unit (obstetrician-led care) were performed with questions on timing, frequency and content of consultations/surveillance in late-term pregnancy and on timing of induction. Propositions about late-term pregnancy were assessed using Likert scale questions. RESULTS: The response rate was 40% (203/511) in midwifery-led care and 92% (80/87) in obstetrician-led care. All obstetric units made regional protocols with their collaborating midwifery practices about management in late-term pregnancy. Most midwifery-led care practices (93%) refer low-risk women at least once for consultation in obstetrician-led care in late-term pregnancy. The content of consultations varies among hospitals. Membrane sweeping is performed more in midwifery-led care compared to obstetrician-led care (90% vs 31%, p < 0.001). Consultation at 41 weeks should be standard care according to 47% of midwifery-led care practices and 83% of obstetrician-led care units (p < 0.001). Induction of labour at 41.0 weeks is offered less often to women in midwifery-led care in comparison to obstetrician-led care (3% vs 21%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial practice variation exists within and between midwifery-and obstetrician-led care in the Netherlands regarding timing, frequency and content of antenatal monitoring in late-term pregnancy and timing of labour induction. An evidence based interdisciplinary guideline will contribute to a higher level of uniformity in the management in late- term pregnancies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2294-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6532173 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65321732019-05-28 Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care Kortekaas, Joep C. Bruinsma, Aafke Keulen, Judit K. J. Vandenbussche, Frank P.H.A. van Dillen, Jeroen de Miranda, Esteriek BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article ABSTRACT: Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care. BACKGROUND: Since there is no consensus regarding the optimal management in late-term pregnancies (≥41.0 weeks), we explored the variety of management strategies in late-term pregnancy in the Netherlands to identify the magnitude of this variety and the attitude towards late-term pregnancy. METHODS: Two nationwide surveys amongst all midwifery practices (midwifery-led care) and all hospitals with an obstetric unit (obstetrician-led care) were performed with questions on timing, frequency and content of consultations/surveillance in late-term pregnancy and on timing of induction. Propositions about late-term pregnancy were assessed using Likert scale questions. RESULTS: The response rate was 40% (203/511) in midwifery-led care and 92% (80/87) in obstetrician-led care. All obstetric units made regional protocols with their collaborating midwifery practices about management in late-term pregnancy. Most midwifery-led care practices (93%) refer low-risk women at least once for consultation in obstetrician-led care in late-term pregnancy. The content of consultations varies among hospitals. Membrane sweeping is performed more in midwifery-led care compared to obstetrician-led care (90% vs 31%, p < 0.001). Consultation at 41 weeks should be standard care according to 47% of midwifery-led care practices and 83% of obstetrician-led care units (p < 0.001). Induction of labour at 41.0 weeks is offered less often to women in midwifery-led care in comparison to obstetrician-led care (3% vs 21%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial practice variation exists within and between midwifery-and obstetrician-led care in the Netherlands regarding timing, frequency and content of antenatal monitoring in late-term pregnancy and timing of labour induction. An evidence based interdisciplinary guideline will contribute to a higher level of uniformity in the management in late- term pregnancies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2294-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6532173/ /pubmed/31117985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2294-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kortekaas, Joep C. Bruinsma, Aafke Keulen, Judit K. J. Vandenbussche, Frank P.H.A. van Dillen, Jeroen de Miranda, Esteriek Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care |
title | Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care |
title_full | Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care |
title_fullStr | Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care |
title_full_unstemmed | Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care |
title_short | Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care |
title_sort | management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31117985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2294-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kortekaasjoepc managementoflatetermpregnancyinmidwiferyandobstetricianledcare AT bruinsmaaafke managementoflatetermpregnancyinmidwiferyandobstetricianledcare AT keulenjuditkj managementoflatetermpregnancyinmidwiferyandobstetricianledcare AT vandenbusschefrankpha managementoflatetermpregnancyinmidwiferyandobstetricianledcare AT vandillenjeroen managementoflatetermpregnancyinmidwiferyandobstetricianledcare AT demirandaesteriek managementoflatetermpregnancyinmidwiferyandobstetricianledcare |