Cargando…

Incorporating ex-vivo lung perfusion into the UK adult lung transplant service: an economic evaluation and decision analytic model

BACKGROUND: An estimated 20–30% of end-stage lung disease patients awaiting lung transplant die whilst on the waiting list due to a shortage of suitable donor lungs. Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion is a technique that reconditions donor lungs initially not deemed usable in order to make them suitable for tra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McMeekin, N., Chrysos, A. E., Vale, L., Fisher, A. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31117992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4154-6
_version_ 1783420971541069824
author McMeekin, N.
Chrysos, A. E.
Vale, L.
Fisher, A. J.
author_facet McMeekin, N.
Chrysos, A. E.
Vale, L.
Fisher, A. J.
author_sort McMeekin, N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An estimated 20–30% of end-stage lung disease patients awaiting lung transplant die whilst on the waiting list due to a shortage of suitable donor lungs. Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion is a technique that reconditions donor lungs initially not deemed usable in order to make them suitable for transplantation, thereby increasing the donor pool. In this study, an economic evaluation was conducted as part of DEVELOP-UK, a multi-centre study assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion technique in the United Kingdom. METHODS: We estimated the cost-effectiveness of a UK adult lung transplant service combining both standard and Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion transplants compared to a service including only standard lung transplants. A Markov model was developed and populated with a combination of DEVELOP-UK, published and clinical routine data, and extrapolated to a lifetime horizon. Probabilistic sensitivity and scenario analyses were used to explore uncertainty in the final outcomes. RESULTS: Base-case model results estimated life years gained of 0.040, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained of 0.045 and an incremental cost per QALY of £90,000 for Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion. Scenario analyses carried out suggest that an improved rate of converting unusable donor lungs using Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion, similar resource use post-transplant for both standard and EVLP lung transplant and applying increased waiting list costs would reduce ICERs to approximately £30,000 or below. CONCLUSION: DEVELOP-UK base-case results suggest that incorporating Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion into the UK adult lung transplant service is more effective, increasing the number of donor lungs available for transplant, but would not currently be considered cost-effective in the UK using the present NICE threshold. However, results were sensitive to change in some model parameters and in several plausible scenario analyses results indicate that a service incorporating Ex-vivo lung perfusion would be considered cost-effective . TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry number: ISRCTN44922411. Date of registration: 06/02/2012. Retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6532206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65322062019-05-29 Incorporating ex-vivo lung perfusion into the UK adult lung transplant service: an economic evaluation and decision analytic model McMeekin, N. Chrysos, A. E. Vale, L. Fisher, A. J. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: An estimated 20–30% of end-stage lung disease patients awaiting lung transplant die whilst on the waiting list due to a shortage of suitable donor lungs. Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion is a technique that reconditions donor lungs initially not deemed usable in order to make them suitable for transplantation, thereby increasing the donor pool. In this study, an economic evaluation was conducted as part of DEVELOP-UK, a multi-centre study assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion technique in the United Kingdom. METHODS: We estimated the cost-effectiveness of a UK adult lung transplant service combining both standard and Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion transplants compared to a service including only standard lung transplants. A Markov model was developed and populated with a combination of DEVELOP-UK, published and clinical routine data, and extrapolated to a lifetime horizon. Probabilistic sensitivity and scenario analyses were used to explore uncertainty in the final outcomes. RESULTS: Base-case model results estimated life years gained of 0.040, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained of 0.045 and an incremental cost per QALY of £90,000 for Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion. Scenario analyses carried out suggest that an improved rate of converting unusable donor lungs using Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion, similar resource use post-transplant for both standard and EVLP lung transplant and applying increased waiting list costs would reduce ICERs to approximately £30,000 or below. CONCLUSION: DEVELOP-UK base-case results suggest that incorporating Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion into the UK adult lung transplant service is more effective, increasing the number of donor lungs available for transplant, but would not currently be considered cost-effective in the UK using the present NICE threshold. However, results were sensitive to change in some model parameters and in several plausible scenario analyses results indicate that a service incorporating Ex-vivo lung perfusion would be considered cost-effective . TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry number: ISRCTN44922411. Date of registration: 06/02/2012. Retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2019-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6532206/ /pubmed/31117992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4154-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
McMeekin, N.
Chrysos, A. E.
Vale, L.
Fisher, A. J.
Incorporating ex-vivo lung perfusion into the UK adult lung transplant service: an economic evaluation and decision analytic model
title Incorporating ex-vivo lung perfusion into the UK adult lung transplant service: an economic evaluation and decision analytic model
title_full Incorporating ex-vivo lung perfusion into the UK adult lung transplant service: an economic evaluation and decision analytic model
title_fullStr Incorporating ex-vivo lung perfusion into the UK adult lung transplant service: an economic evaluation and decision analytic model
title_full_unstemmed Incorporating ex-vivo lung perfusion into the UK adult lung transplant service: an economic evaluation and decision analytic model
title_short Incorporating ex-vivo lung perfusion into the UK adult lung transplant service: an economic evaluation and decision analytic model
title_sort incorporating ex-vivo lung perfusion into the uk adult lung transplant service: an economic evaluation and decision analytic model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31117992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4154-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mcmeekinn incorporatingexvivolungperfusionintotheukadultlungtransplantserviceaneconomicevaluationanddecisionanalyticmodel
AT chrysosae incorporatingexvivolungperfusionintotheukadultlungtransplantserviceaneconomicevaluationanddecisionanalyticmodel
AT valel incorporatingexvivolungperfusionintotheukadultlungtransplantserviceaneconomicevaluationanddecisionanalyticmodel
AT fisheraj incorporatingexvivolungperfusionintotheukadultlungtransplantserviceaneconomicevaluationanddecisionanalyticmodel