Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment for patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Radiation or radiochemotherapy is a common adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been demonstrated to provide better dose conformity, allowing dose escalation and/or reduction of normal tissue exposure compared with three-dimensional confor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ren, Fang, Li, Shaodan, Zhang, Yin, Zhao, Zhifei, Wang, Haiming, Cui, Yixin, Wang, Maoyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1294-0
_version_ 1783420983403610112
author Ren, Fang
Li, Shaodan
Zhang, Yin
Zhao, Zhifei
Wang, Haiming
Cui, Yixin
Wang, Maoyun
author_facet Ren, Fang
Li, Shaodan
Zhang, Yin
Zhao, Zhifei
Wang, Haiming
Cui, Yixin
Wang, Maoyun
author_sort Ren, Fang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Radiation or radiochemotherapy is a common adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been demonstrated to provide better dose conformity, allowing dose escalation and/or reduction of normal tissue exposure compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment (3D-CRT). However, the efficacy of IMRT and 3D-CRT in gastric cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of IMRT with those of 3D-CRT in treating patients with gastric cancer through conducting a meta-analysis of 3-year survival rates [overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)], local control rates, and toxic event rates. METHODS: Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and clinical trial databases were searched to identify the clinical trials of IMRT versus 3D-CRT for treating patients with gastric cancer. The obtained data of survival and safety were analyzed using the Stata 14.0 software. RESULTS: A total of 9 controlled clinical studies, including 516 patients with gastric cancer, met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the 3-year OS rate was slightly higher in the IMRT group than in the 3D-CRT group, without any statistical significance. The 3-year local control rate was significantly higher in the IMRT group than in the 3D-CRT group. No significant difference in the 3-year DFS rate was found between the IMRT and 3D-CRT groups. Grade 2–4 toxicities were similar between the IMRT and 3D-CRT groups. CONCLUSION: The findings suggested that IMRT might be superior to 3D-CRT in treating patients with gastric cancer in terms of local control rates without increasing toxicity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-019-1294-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6532249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65322492019-05-29 Efficacy and safety of intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment for patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ren, Fang Li, Shaodan Zhang, Yin Zhao, Zhifei Wang, Haiming Cui, Yixin Wang, Maoyun Radiat Oncol Review BACKGROUND: Radiation or radiochemotherapy is a common adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been demonstrated to provide better dose conformity, allowing dose escalation and/or reduction of normal tissue exposure compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment (3D-CRT). However, the efficacy of IMRT and 3D-CRT in gastric cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of IMRT with those of 3D-CRT in treating patients with gastric cancer through conducting a meta-analysis of 3-year survival rates [overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)], local control rates, and toxic event rates. METHODS: Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and clinical trial databases were searched to identify the clinical trials of IMRT versus 3D-CRT for treating patients with gastric cancer. The obtained data of survival and safety were analyzed using the Stata 14.0 software. RESULTS: A total of 9 controlled clinical studies, including 516 patients with gastric cancer, met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the 3-year OS rate was slightly higher in the IMRT group than in the 3D-CRT group, without any statistical significance. The 3-year local control rate was significantly higher in the IMRT group than in the 3D-CRT group. No significant difference in the 3-year DFS rate was found between the IMRT and 3D-CRT groups. Grade 2–4 toxicities were similar between the IMRT and 3D-CRT groups. CONCLUSION: The findings suggested that IMRT might be superior to 3D-CRT in treating patients with gastric cancer in terms of local control rates without increasing toxicity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-019-1294-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6532249/ /pubmed/31118042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1294-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Ren, Fang
Li, Shaodan
Zhang, Yin
Zhao, Zhifei
Wang, Haiming
Cui, Yixin
Wang, Maoyun
Efficacy and safety of intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment for patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment for patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment for patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment for patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment for patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment for patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment for patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1294-0
work_keys_str_mv AT renfang efficacyandsafetyofintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyversusthreedimensionalconformalradiationtreatmentforpatientswithgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lishaodan efficacyandsafetyofintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyversusthreedimensionalconformalradiationtreatmentforpatientswithgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangyin efficacyandsafetyofintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyversusthreedimensionalconformalradiationtreatmentforpatientswithgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaozhifei efficacyandsafetyofintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyversusthreedimensionalconformalradiationtreatmentforpatientswithgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wanghaiming efficacyandsafetyofintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyversusthreedimensionalconformalradiationtreatmentforpatientswithgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cuiyixin efficacyandsafetyofintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyversusthreedimensionalconformalradiationtreatmentforpatientswithgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangmaoyun efficacyandsafetyofintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyversusthreedimensionalconformalradiationtreatmentforpatientswithgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis