Cargando…

Impact of Moderate Sedation versus Monitored Anesthesia Care on Outcomes and Cost of Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The ideal type of sedation for endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is not known. Two previous studies comparing the diagnostic yield between moderate sedation (MS) and deep sedation/general anesthesia (DS/GA) had provided conflicting resul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boujaoude, Ziad, Arya, Rohan, Shrivastava, Aseem, Pratter, Melvin, Abouzgheib, Wissam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31210988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4347852
_version_ 1783420995027075072
author Boujaoude, Ziad
Arya, Rohan
Shrivastava, Aseem
Pratter, Melvin
Abouzgheib, Wissam
author_facet Boujaoude, Ziad
Arya, Rohan
Shrivastava, Aseem
Pratter, Melvin
Abouzgheib, Wissam
author_sort Boujaoude, Ziad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The ideal type of sedation for endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is not known. Two previous studies comparing the diagnostic yield between moderate sedation (MS) and deep sedation/general anesthesia (DS/GA) had provided conflicting results with one study clearly favoring the latter. No study had addressed cost. This is concerning for pulmonologists without routine access to anesthesia services. Our objective was to assess the impact of MS and Monitored Anesthesia Care (sedation administered and monitored by an anesthesiologist) on the outcomes and cost of EBUS-TBNA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on consecutive EBUS-TBNA performed under two different types of sedation in a single academic center. A diagnostic TBNA was defined as an aspirate yielding any specific diagnosis or if subsequent surgery or follow-up of nondiagnostic/normal aspirates showed no pathology. Current Medicare time-based allowances were used for professional charges calculation. RESULTS: There was no difference observed between MS and MAC in regards of the diagnostic yield (92.9% versus 91.9%), procedure duration, number, location, and size of lymph node (LN) sampled, but there were more passes per LN with MAC. The average charges were 74.30 USD for MS and 319.91 for MAC. There were more hypotensive and desaturations episodes with MAC but none required escalation of care. CONCLUSIONS: When performed under MS, EBUS-TBNA has similar diagnostic yield as under MAC but may be associated with less side effects. The difference in sedation cost is modest; however, an additional 245$ for each EBUS done under MAC would have significant cost implications on the health system. These findings are of critical importance for bronchoscopists without routine access to anesthesia services and for optimization of healthcare cost and resource utilization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6532291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65322912019-06-17 Impact of Moderate Sedation versus Monitored Anesthesia Care on Outcomes and Cost of Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Boujaoude, Ziad Arya, Rohan Shrivastava, Aseem Pratter, Melvin Abouzgheib, Wissam Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The ideal type of sedation for endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is not known. Two previous studies comparing the diagnostic yield between moderate sedation (MS) and deep sedation/general anesthesia (DS/GA) had provided conflicting results with one study clearly favoring the latter. No study had addressed cost. This is concerning for pulmonologists without routine access to anesthesia services. Our objective was to assess the impact of MS and Monitored Anesthesia Care (sedation administered and monitored by an anesthesiologist) on the outcomes and cost of EBUS-TBNA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on consecutive EBUS-TBNA performed under two different types of sedation in a single academic center. A diagnostic TBNA was defined as an aspirate yielding any specific diagnosis or if subsequent surgery or follow-up of nondiagnostic/normal aspirates showed no pathology. Current Medicare time-based allowances were used for professional charges calculation. RESULTS: There was no difference observed between MS and MAC in regards of the diagnostic yield (92.9% versus 91.9%), procedure duration, number, location, and size of lymph node (LN) sampled, but there were more passes per LN with MAC. The average charges were 74.30 USD for MS and 319.91 for MAC. There were more hypotensive and desaturations episodes with MAC but none required escalation of care. CONCLUSIONS: When performed under MS, EBUS-TBNA has similar diagnostic yield as under MAC but may be associated with less side effects. The difference in sedation cost is modest; however, an additional 245$ for each EBUS done under MAC would have significant cost implications on the health system. These findings are of critical importance for bronchoscopists without routine access to anesthesia services and for optimization of healthcare cost and resource utilization. Hindawi 2019-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6532291/ /pubmed/31210988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4347852 Text en Copyright © 2019 Ziad Boujaoude et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Boujaoude, Ziad
Arya, Rohan
Shrivastava, Aseem
Pratter, Melvin
Abouzgheib, Wissam
Impact of Moderate Sedation versus Monitored Anesthesia Care on Outcomes and Cost of Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
title Impact of Moderate Sedation versus Monitored Anesthesia Care on Outcomes and Cost of Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
title_full Impact of Moderate Sedation versus Monitored Anesthesia Care on Outcomes and Cost of Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
title_fullStr Impact of Moderate Sedation versus Monitored Anesthesia Care on Outcomes and Cost of Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Moderate Sedation versus Monitored Anesthesia Care on Outcomes and Cost of Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
title_short Impact of Moderate Sedation versus Monitored Anesthesia Care on Outcomes and Cost of Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
title_sort impact of moderate sedation versus monitored anesthesia care on outcomes and cost of endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31210988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4347852
work_keys_str_mv AT boujaoudeziad impactofmoderatesedationversusmonitoredanesthesiacareonoutcomesandcostofendobronchialultrasoundtransbronchialneedleaspiration
AT aryarohan impactofmoderatesedationversusmonitoredanesthesiacareonoutcomesandcostofendobronchialultrasoundtransbronchialneedleaspiration
AT shrivastavaaseem impactofmoderatesedationversusmonitoredanesthesiacareonoutcomesandcostofendobronchialultrasoundtransbronchialneedleaspiration
AT prattermelvin impactofmoderatesedationversusmonitoredanesthesiacareonoutcomesandcostofendobronchialultrasoundtransbronchialneedleaspiration
AT abouzgheibwissam impactofmoderatesedationversusmonitoredanesthesiacareonoutcomesandcostofendobronchialultrasoundtransbronchialneedleaspiration