Cargando…

Assessment of cotinine in urine and saliva of smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers: Method validation using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry

BACKGROUND: Self-report does not provide complete information about tobacco smoke exposure among users and is not relevant for secondhand exposure detection. Biochemical screening for primary metabolite of nicotine would be useful to validate the smoking status and exposure to secondhand smoke. AIMS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Priyamvada, Sane, Niharika, Anand, Shravanthi D., Marimutthu, P, Benegal, Vivek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31142905
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_61_18
_version_ 1783421032727576576
author Sharma, Priyamvada
Sane, Niharika
Anand, Shravanthi D.
Marimutthu, P
Benegal, Vivek
author_facet Sharma, Priyamvada
Sane, Niharika
Anand, Shravanthi D.
Marimutthu, P
Benegal, Vivek
author_sort Sharma, Priyamvada
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Self-report does not provide complete information about tobacco smoke exposure among users and is not relevant for secondhand exposure detection. Biochemical screening for primary metabolite of nicotine would be useful to validate the smoking status and exposure to secondhand smoke. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the performance of a sensitive and rapid method to verify smoking status among smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers by quantification of cotinine in saliva and urine using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cotinine (urine and saliva) levels were measured in 98 participants out of which active users (smoked tobacco users; n = 56) and persons exposed to tobacco smoke (passive smokers; n = 15). Values obtained were compared with nonusers (nonsmokers; n = 27). A simple, rapid, and sensitive method was developed and validated for this purpose. With minimal sample preparation, the current analytical procedure showed a wide detection range (1.1–1000 ng/mL) which made it suitable for analyzing various biological matrices. RESULTS: The mean cotinine levels of urine for smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers were 1043.7, 36.63, and 13.6 ng/ml, respectively, while in saliva, it was 327.39, 18.31, and 9.53 ng/ml, respectively. CONCLUSION: Analysis of variance showed that cotinine levels (urine and saliva) of smokers were significantly higher levels than passive smokers and nonsmokers (P < 0.01). Similarly, passive smokers also had significantly higher cotinine levels (urine and saliva) than nonsmokers (P < 0.001).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6532461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65324612019-05-29 Assessment of cotinine in urine and saliva of smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers: Method validation using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry Sharma, Priyamvada Sane, Niharika Anand, Shravanthi D. Marimutthu, P Benegal, Vivek Indian J Psychiatry Original Article BACKGROUND: Self-report does not provide complete information about tobacco smoke exposure among users and is not relevant for secondhand exposure detection. Biochemical screening for primary metabolite of nicotine would be useful to validate the smoking status and exposure to secondhand smoke. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the performance of a sensitive and rapid method to verify smoking status among smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers by quantification of cotinine in saliva and urine using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cotinine (urine and saliva) levels were measured in 98 participants out of which active users (smoked tobacco users; n = 56) and persons exposed to tobacco smoke (passive smokers; n = 15). Values obtained were compared with nonusers (nonsmokers; n = 27). A simple, rapid, and sensitive method was developed and validated for this purpose. With minimal sample preparation, the current analytical procedure showed a wide detection range (1.1–1000 ng/mL) which made it suitable for analyzing various biological matrices. RESULTS: The mean cotinine levels of urine for smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers were 1043.7, 36.63, and 13.6 ng/ml, respectively, while in saliva, it was 327.39, 18.31, and 9.53 ng/ml, respectively. CONCLUSION: Analysis of variance showed that cotinine levels (urine and saliva) of smokers were significantly higher levels than passive smokers and nonsmokers (P < 0.01). Similarly, passive smokers also had significantly higher cotinine levels (urine and saliva) than nonsmokers (P < 0.001). Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6532461/ /pubmed/31142905 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_61_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Psychiatry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharma, Priyamvada
Sane, Niharika
Anand, Shravanthi D.
Marimutthu, P
Benegal, Vivek
Assessment of cotinine in urine and saliva of smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers: Method validation using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry
title Assessment of cotinine in urine and saliva of smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers: Method validation using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry
title_full Assessment of cotinine in urine and saliva of smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers: Method validation using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry
title_fullStr Assessment of cotinine in urine and saliva of smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers: Method validation using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of cotinine in urine and saliva of smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers: Method validation using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry
title_short Assessment of cotinine in urine and saliva of smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers: Method validation using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry
title_sort assessment of cotinine in urine and saliva of smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers: method validation using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31142905
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_61_18
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmapriyamvada assessmentofcotinineinurineandsalivaofsmokerspassivesmokersandnonsmokersmethodvalidationusingliquidchromatographyandmassspectrometry
AT saneniharika assessmentofcotinineinurineandsalivaofsmokerspassivesmokersandnonsmokersmethodvalidationusingliquidchromatographyandmassspectrometry
AT anandshravanthid assessmentofcotinineinurineandsalivaofsmokerspassivesmokersandnonsmokersmethodvalidationusingliquidchromatographyandmassspectrometry
AT marimutthup assessmentofcotinineinurineandsalivaofsmokerspassivesmokersandnonsmokersmethodvalidationusingliquidchromatographyandmassspectrometry
AT benegalvivek assessmentofcotinineinurineandsalivaofsmokerspassivesmokersandnonsmokersmethodvalidationusingliquidchromatographyandmassspectrometry