Cargando…
Assessment of cotinine in urine and saliva of smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers: Method validation using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry
BACKGROUND: Self-report does not provide complete information about tobacco smoke exposure among users and is not relevant for secondhand exposure detection. Biochemical screening for primary metabolite of nicotine would be useful to validate the smoking status and exposure to secondhand smoke. AIMS...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31142905 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_61_18 |
_version_ | 1783421032727576576 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Priyamvada Sane, Niharika Anand, Shravanthi D. Marimutthu, P Benegal, Vivek |
author_facet | Sharma, Priyamvada Sane, Niharika Anand, Shravanthi D. Marimutthu, P Benegal, Vivek |
author_sort | Sharma, Priyamvada |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Self-report does not provide complete information about tobacco smoke exposure among users and is not relevant for secondhand exposure detection. Biochemical screening for primary metabolite of nicotine would be useful to validate the smoking status and exposure to secondhand smoke. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the performance of a sensitive and rapid method to verify smoking status among smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers by quantification of cotinine in saliva and urine using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cotinine (urine and saliva) levels were measured in 98 participants out of which active users (smoked tobacco users; n = 56) and persons exposed to tobacco smoke (passive smokers; n = 15). Values obtained were compared with nonusers (nonsmokers; n = 27). A simple, rapid, and sensitive method was developed and validated for this purpose. With minimal sample preparation, the current analytical procedure showed a wide detection range (1.1–1000 ng/mL) which made it suitable for analyzing various biological matrices. RESULTS: The mean cotinine levels of urine for smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers were 1043.7, 36.63, and 13.6 ng/ml, respectively, while in saliva, it was 327.39, 18.31, and 9.53 ng/ml, respectively. CONCLUSION: Analysis of variance showed that cotinine levels (urine and saliva) of smokers were significantly higher levels than passive smokers and nonsmokers (P < 0.01). Similarly, passive smokers also had significantly higher cotinine levels (urine and saliva) than nonsmokers (P < 0.001). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6532461 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65324612019-05-29 Assessment of cotinine in urine and saliva of smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers: Method validation using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry Sharma, Priyamvada Sane, Niharika Anand, Shravanthi D. Marimutthu, P Benegal, Vivek Indian J Psychiatry Original Article BACKGROUND: Self-report does not provide complete information about tobacco smoke exposure among users and is not relevant for secondhand exposure detection. Biochemical screening for primary metabolite of nicotine would be useful to validate the smoking status and exposure to secondhand smoke. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the performance of a sensitive and rapid method to verify smoking status among smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers by quantification of cotinine in saliva and urine using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cotinine (urine and saliva) levels were measured in 98 participants out of which active users (smoked tobacco users; n = 56) and persons exposed to tobacco smoke (passive smokers; n = 15). Values obtained were compared with nonusers (nonsmokers; n = 27). A simple, rapid, and sensitive method was developed and validated for this purpose. With minimal sample preparation, the current analytical procedure showed a wide detection range (1.1–1000 ng/mL) which made it suitable for analyzing various biological matrices. RESULTS: The mean cotinine levels of urine for smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers were 1043.7, 36.63, and 13.6 ng/ml, respectively, while in saliva, it was 327.39, 18.31, and 9.53 ng/ml, respectively. CONCLUSION: Analysis of variance showed that cotinine levels (urine and saliva) of smokers were significantly higher levels than passive smokers and nonsmokers (P < 0.01). Similarly, passive smokers also had significantly higher cotinine levels (urine and saliva) than nonsmokers (P < 0.001). Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6532461/ /pubmed/31142905 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_61_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Psychiatry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sharma, Priyamvada Sane, Niharika Anand, Shravanthi D. Marimutthu, P Benegal, Vivek Assessment of cotinine in urine and saliva of smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers: Method validation using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry |
title | Assessment of cotinine in urine and saliva of smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers: Method validation using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry |
title_full | Assessment of cotinine in urine and saliva of smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers: Method validation using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry |
title_fullStr | Assessment of cotinine in urine and saliva of smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers: Method validation using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of cotinine in urine and saliva of smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers: Method validation using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry |
title_short | Assessment of cotinine in urine and saliva of smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers: Method validation using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry |
title_sort | assessment of cotinine in urine and saliva of smokers, passive smokers, and nonsmokers: method validation using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31142905 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_61_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmapriyamvada assessmentofcotinineinurineandsalivaofsmokerspassivesmokersandnonsmokersmethodvalidationusingliquidchromatographyandmassspectrometry AT saneniharika assessmentofcotinineinurineandsalivaofsmokerspassivesmokersandnonsmokersmethodvalidationusingliquidchromatographyandmassspectrometry AT anandshravanthid assessmentofcotinineinurineandsalivaofsmokerspassivesmokersandnonsmokersmethodvalidationusingliquidchromatographyandmassspectrometry AT marimutthup assessmentofcotinineinurineandsalivaofsmokerspassivesmokersandnonsmokersmethodvalidationusingliquidchromatographyandmassspectrometry AT benegalvivek assessmentofcotinineinurineandsalivaofsmokerspassivesmokersandnonsmokersmethodvalidationusingliquidchromatographyandmassspectrometry |