Cargando…

Chronotype mediates gender differences in risk propensity and risk-taking

Risk-taking is a complex form of decision-making that involves calculated assessments of potential costs and rewards that may be immediate or delayed. Thus, making predictions about inter-individual variation in risk-taking due to personality traits, decision styles or other attributes can be diffic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gowen, Rebecca, Filipowicz, Allan, Ingram, Krista K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31120931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216619
_version_ 1783421074584633344
author Gowen, Rebecca
Filipowicz, Allan
Ingram, Krista K.
author_facet Gowen, Rebecca
Filipowicz, Allan
Ingram, Krista K.
author_sort Gowen, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description Risk-taking is a complex form of decision-making that involves calculated assessments of potential costs and rewards that may be immediate or delayed. Thus, making predictions about inter-individual variation in risk-taking due to personality traits, decision styles or other attributes can be difficult. The association of risk-taking with gender is well-supported; males report higher propensity for risk-taking and show higher risk-taking on tasks measuring actual risk-taking behavior. Risk-taking also appears to be associated with circadian phenotypes (chronotypes), with evening-types reporting higher levels of risk-taking—but this association may be confounded by the fact that, in certain age groups, males are more likely to be evening-types. Here, we test for gender by chronotype effects on risk-taking in young adults (n = 610) using a self-reported risk propensity questionnaire, the health domain of the DOSPERT, and a behavioral task measuring risk-taking, the Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART). Our results show that males report and take significantly more risks than females in this population. In addition, evening-type individuals have significantly higher self-reported risk propensity and tend to take more risks on the BART. Interestingly, there is no significant difference in risk propensity or risk-taking behavior across male circadian phenotypes, but evening-type females significantly report and take more risk than female intermediate and morning types. In regression analyses, we found both gender and chronotype predict risk propensity and risk-taking. Path analysis confirms that chronotype has an indirect effect on gender differences in both risk propensity and risk-taking. Furthermore, we found that trait anxiety (STAI) and sleep disturbance (PROMIS), significantly correlate with chronotype and gender in the complete dataset, but do not independently predict differences in female risk-taking. These results suggest that chronotype mediates gender effects on risk-taking and that these effects are driven primarily by morning-type females, but are not related to gender-specific differences in trait anxiety or sleep quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6532857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65328572019-06-05 Chronotype mediates gender differences in risk propensity and risk-taking Gowen, Rebecca Filipowicz, Allan Ingram, Krista K. PLoS One Research Article Risk-taking is a complex form of decision-making that involves calculated assessments of potential costs and rewards that may be immediate or delayed. Thus, making predictions about inter-individual variation in risk-taking due to personality traits, decision styles or other attributes can be difficult. The association of risk-taking with gender is well-supported; males report higher propensity for risk-taking and show higher risk-taking on tasks measuring actual risk-taking behavior. Risk-taking also appears to be associated with circadian phenotypes (chronotypes), with evening-types reporting higher levels of risk-taking—but this association may be confounded by the fact that, in certain age groups, males are more likely to be evening-types. Here, we test for gender by chronotype effects on risk-taking in young adults (n = 610) using a self-reported risk propensity questionnaire, the health domain of the DOSPERT, and a behavioral task measuring risk-taking, the Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART). Our results show that males report and take significantly more risks than females in this population. In addition, evening-type individuals have significantly higher self-reported risk propensity and tend to take more risks on the BART. Interestingly, there is no significant difference in risk propensity or risk-taking behavior across male circadian phenotypes, but evening-type females significantly report and take more risk than female intermediate and morning types. In regression analyses, we found both gender and chronotype predict risk propensity and risk-taking. Path analysis confirms that chronotype has an indirect effect on gender differences in both risk propensity and risk-taking. Furthermore, we found that trait anxiety (STAI) and sleep disturbance (PROMIS), significantly correlate with chronotype and gender in the complete dataset, but do not independently predict differences in female risk-taking. These results suggest that chronotype mediates gender effects on risk-taking and that these effects are driven primarily by morning-type females, but are not related to gender-specific differences in trait anxiety or sleep quality. Public Library of Science 2019-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6532857/ /pubmed/31120931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216619 Text en © 2019 Gowen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gowen, Rebecca
Filipowicz, Allan
Ingram, Krista K.
Chronotype mediates gender differences in risk propensity and risk-taking
title Chronotype mediates gender differences in risk propensity and risk-taking
title_full Chronotype mediates gender differences in risk propensity and risk-taking
title_fullStr Chronotype mediates gender differences in risk propensity and risk-taking
title_full_unstemmed Chronotype mediates gender differences in risk propensity and risk-taking
title_short Chronotype mediates gender differences in risk propensity and risk-taking
title_sort chronotype mediates gender differences in risk propensity and risk-taking
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31120931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216619
work_keys_str_mv AT gowenrebecca chronotypemediatesgenderdifferencesinriskpropensityandrisktaking
AT filipowiczallan chronotypemediatesgenderdifferencesinriskpropensityandrisktaking
AT ingramkristak chronotypemediatesgenderdifferencesinriskpropensityandrisktaking