Cargando…

Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics

There is ongoing debate on whether object meaning can be processed outside foveal vision, making semantics available for attentional guidance. Much of the debate has centred on whether objects that do not fit within an overall scene draw attention, in complex displays that are often difficult to con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nuthmann, Antje, de Groot, Floor, Huettig, Falk, Olivers, Christian N. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31120948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217051
_version_ 1783421080921178112
author Nuthmann, Antje
de Groot, Floor
Huettig, Falk
Olivers, Christian N. L.
author_facet Nuthmann, Antje
de Groot, Floor
Huettig, Falk
Olivers, Christian N. L.
author_sort Nuthmann, Antje
collection PubMed
description There is ongoing debate on whether object meaning can be processed outside foveal vision, making semantics available for attentional guidance. Much of the debate has centred on whether objects that do not fit within an overall scene draw attention, in complex displays that are often difficult to control. Here, we revisited the question by reanalysing data from three experiments that used displays consisting of standalone objects from a carefully controlled stimulus set. Observers searched for a target object, as per auditory instruction. On the critical trials, the displays contained no target but objects that were semantically related to the target, visually related, or unrelated. Analyses using (generalized) linear mixed-effects models showed that, although visually related objects attracted most attention, semantically related objects were also fixated earlier in time than unrelated objects. Moreover, semantic matches affected the very first saccade in the display. The amplitudes of saccades that first entered semantically related objects were larger than 5° on average, confirming that object semantics is available outside foveal vision. Finally, there was no semantic capture of attention for the same objects when observers did not actively look for the target, confirming that it was not stimulus-driven. We discuss the implications for existing models of visual cognition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6532879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65328792019-06-05 Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics Nuthmann, Antje de Groot, Floor Huettig, Falk Olivers, Christian N. L. PLoS One Research Article There is ongoing debate on whether object meaning can be processed outside foveal vision, making semantics available for attentional guidance. Much of the debate has centred on whether objects that do not fit within an overall scene draw attention, in complex displays that are often difficult to control. Here, we revisited the question by reanalysing data from three experiments that used displays consisting of standalone objects from a carefully controlled stimulus set. Observers searched for a target object, as per auditory instruction. On the critical trials, the displays contained no target but objects that were semantically related to the target, visually related, or unrelated. Analyses using (generalized) linear mixed-effects models showed that, although visually related objects attracted most attention, semantically related objects were also fixated earlier in time than unrelated objects. Moreover, semantic matches affected the very first saccade in the display. The amplitudes of saccades that first entered semantically related objects were larger than 5° on average, confirming that object semantics is available outside foveal vision. Finally, there was no semantic capture of attention for the same objects when observers did not actively look for the target, confirming that it was not stimulus-driven. We discuss the implications for existing models of visual cognition. Public Library of Science 2019-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6532879/ /pubmed/31120948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217051 Text en © 2019 Nuthmann et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nuthmann, Antje
de Groot, Floor
Huettig, Falk
Olivers, Christian N. L.
Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics
title Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics
title_full Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics
title_fullStr Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics
title_full_unstemmed Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics
title_short Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics
title_sort extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31120948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217051
work_keys_str_mv AT nuthmannantje extrafovealattentionalcapturebyobjectsemantics
AT degrootfloor extrafovealattentionalcapturebyobjectsemantics
AT huettigfalk extrafovealattentionalcapturebyobjectsemantics
AT oliverschristiannl extrafovealattentionalcapturebyobjectsemantics