Cargando…
Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics
There is ongoing debate on whether object meaning can be processed outside foveal vision, making semantics available for attentional guidance. Much of the debate has centred on whether objects that do not fit within an overall scene draw attention, in complex displays that are often difficult to con...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31120948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217051 |
_version_ | 1783421080921178112 |
---|---|
author | Nuthmann, Antje de Groot, Floor Huettig, Falk Olivers, Christian N. L. |
author_facet | Nuthmann, Antje de Groot, Floor Huettig, Falk Olivers, Christian N. L. |
author_sort | Nuthmann, Antje |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is ongoing debate on whether object meaning can be processed outside foveal vision, making semantics available for attentional guidance. Much of the debate has centred on whether objects that do not fit within an overall scene draw attention, in complex displays that are often difficult to control. Here, we revisited the question by reanalysing data from three experiments that used displays consisting of standalone objects from a carefully controlled stimulus set. Observers searched for a target object, as per auditory instruction. On the critical trials, the displays contained no target but objects that were semantically related to the target, visually related, or unrelated. Analyses using (generalized) linear mixed-effects models showed that, although visually related objects attracted most attention, semantically related objects were also fixated earlier in time than unrelated objects. Moreover, semantic matches affected the very first saccade in the display. The amplitudes of saccades that first entered semantically related objects were larger than 5° on average, confirming that object semantics is available outside foveal vision. Finally, there was no semantic capture of attention for the same objects when observers did not actively look for the target, confirming that it was not stimulus-driven. We discuss the implications for existing models of visual cognition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6532879 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65328792019-06-05 Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics Nuthmann, Antje de Groot, Floor Huettig, Falk Olivers, Christian N. L. PLoS One Research Article There is ongoing debate on whether object meaning can be processed outside foveal vision, making semantics available for attentional guidance. Much of the debate has centred on whether objects that do not fit within an overall scene draw attention, in complex displays that are often difficult to control. Here, we revisited the question by reanalysing data from three experiments that used displays consisting of standalone objects from a carefully controlled stimulus set. Observers searched for a target object, as per auditory instruction. On the critical trials, the displays contained no target but objects that were semantically related to the target, visually related, or unrelated. Analyses using (generalized) linear mixed-effects models showed that, although visually related objects attracted most attention, semantically related objects were also fixated earlier in time than unrelated objects. Moreover, semantic matches affected the very first saccade in the display. The amplitudes of saccades that first entered semantically related objects were larger than 5° on average, confirming that object semantics is available outside foveal vision. Finally, there was no semantic capture of attention for the same objects when observers did not actively look for the target, confirming that it was not stimulus-driven. We discuss the implications for existing models of visual cognition. Public Library of Science 2019-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6532879/ /pubmed/31120948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217051 Text en © 2019 Nuthmann et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nuthmann, Antje de Groot, Floor Huettig, Falk Olivers, Christian N. L. Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics |
title | Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics |
title_full | Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics |
title_fullStr | Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics |
title_full_unstemmed | Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics |
title_short | Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics |
title_sort | extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31120948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217051 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nuthmannantje extrafovealattentionalcapturebyobjectsemantics AT degrootfloor extrafovealattentionalcapturebyobjectsemantics AT huettigfalk extrafovealattentionalcapturebyobjectsemantics AT oliverschristiannl extrafovealattentionalcapturebyobjectsemantics |