Cargando…
Uncertainty analysis of species distribution models
The maximum entropy model, a commonly used species distribution model (SDM) normally combines observations of the species occurrence with environmental information to predict the geographic distributions of animal or plant species. However, it only produces point estimates for the probability of spe...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31120909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214190 |
_version_ | 1783421114211368960 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Xi Dimitrov, Nedialko B. Meyers, Lauren Ancel |
author_facet | Chen, Xi Dimitrov, Nedialko B. Meyers, Lauren Ancel |
author_sort | Chen, Xi |
collection | PubMed |
description | The maximum entropy model, a commonly used species distribution model (SDM) normally combines observations of the species occurrence with environmental information to predict the geographic distributions of animal or plant species. However, it only produces point estimates for the probability of species existence. To understand the uncertainty of the point estimates, we analytically derived the variance of the outputs of the maximum entropy model from the variance of the input. We applied the analytic method to obtain the standard deviation of dengue importation probability and Aedes aegypti suitability. Dengue occurrence data and Aedes aegypti mosquito abundance data, combined with demographic and environmental data, were applied to obtain point estimates and the corresponding variance. To address the issue of not having the true distributions for comparison, we compared and contrasted the performance of the analytical expression with the bootstrap method and Poisson point process model which proved of equivalence of maximum entropy model with the assumption of independent point locations. Both Dengue importation probability and Aedes aegypti mosquito suitability examples show that the methods generate comparatively the same results and the analytic method we introduced is dramatically faster than the bootstrap method and directly apply to maximum entropy model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6533036 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65330362019-06-05 Uncertainty analysis of species distribution models Chen, Xi Dimitrov, Nedialko B. Meyers, Lauren Ancel PLoS One Research Article The maximum entropy model, a commonly used species distribution model (SDM) normally combines observations of the species occurrence with environmental information to predict the geographic distributions of animal or plant species. However, it only produces point estimates for the probability of species existence. To understand the uncertainty of the point estimates, we analytically derived the variance of the outputs of the maximum entropy model from the variance of the input. We applied the analytic method to obtain the standard deviation of dengue importation probability and Aedes aegypti suitability. Dengue occurrence data and Aedes aegypti mosquito abundance data, combined with demographic and environmental data, were applied to obtain point estimates and the corresponding variance. To address the issue of not having the true distributions for comparison, we compared and contrasted the performance of the analytical expression with the bootstrap method and Poisson point process model which proved of equivalence of maximum entropy model with the assumption of independent point locations. Both Dengue importation probability and Aedes aegypti mosquito suitability examples show that the methods generate comparatively the same results and the analytic method we introduced is dramatically faster than the bootstrap method and directly apply to maximum entropy model. Public Library of Science 2019-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6533036/ /pubmed/31120909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214190 Text en © 2019 Chen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chen, Xi Dimitrov, Nedialko B. Meyers, Lauren Ancel Uncertainty analysis of species distribution models |
title | Uncertainty analysis of species distribution models |
title_full | Uncertainty analysis of species distribution models |
title_fullStr | Uncertainty analysis of species distribution models |
title_full_unstemmed | Uncertainty analysis of species distribution models |
title_short | Uncertainty analysis of species distribution models |
title_sort | uncertainty analysis of species distribution models |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31120909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214190 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenxi uncertaintyanalysisofspeciesdistributionmodels AT dimitrovnedialkob uncertaintyanalysisofspeciesdistributionmodels AT meyerslaurenancel uncertaintyanalysisofspeciesdistributionmodels |