Cargando…

Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction

PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the level of sensible impairment after mastectomy or implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR). In addition, factors influencing breast sensibility were evaluated. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in Maastricht University Medical Center bet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bijkerk, E., van Kuijk, S. M. J., Beugels, J., Cornelissen, A. J. M., Heuts, E. M., van der Hulst, R. R. W. J., Tuinder, S. M. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30746634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05137-8
_version_ 1783421143858806784
author Bijkerk, E.
van Kuijk, S. M. J.
Beugels, J.
Cornelissen, A. J. M.
Heuts, E. M.
van der Hulst, R. R. W. J.
Tuinder, S. M. H.
author_facet Bijkerk, E.
van Kuijk, S. M. J.
Beugels, J.
Cornelissen, A. J. M.
Heuts, E. M.
van der Hulst, R. R. W. J.
Tuinder, S. M. H.
author_sort Bijkerk, E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the level of sensible impairment after mastectomy or implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR). In addition, factors influencing breast sensibility were evaluated. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in Maastricht University Medical Center between July 2016 and August 2018. Women with unilateral mastectomy with or without IBBR were included. Objective sensory measurements were performed using Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments. Their healthy breast served as control, using a paired t test. Differences between mastectomy with and without IBBR were evaluated using the independent t test. Linear regression was performed to evaluate the association between patient characteristics on breast sensibility. The paired t test was used to evaluate in which part of the breast the sensibility is best preserved. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were eligible for inclusion. Sixteen patients underwent IBBR after mastectomy. Twenty-three patients received radiotherapy and 35 patients received chemotherapy. Monofilament values were significantly higher in the operated group compared to the reference group (p < 0.001). Linear regression showed a statistically significant association between IBBR and objectively measured impaired sensation (p = 0.008). After mastectomy, the cutaneous protective sensation is only diminished. After IBBR, it is lost in the majority of the breast. The medial part of the breast was significantly more sensitive than the lateral part in all operated breasts (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: IBBR has a significantly negative impact on the breast sensibility compared to mastectomy alone. This study shows that the protective sensation of the skin in the breast is lost after IBBR. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the level of sensible impairment after mastectomy or IBBR. More research is necessary to confirm these results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-019-05137-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6533215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65332152019-06-07 Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction Bijkerk, E. van Kuijk, S. M. J. Beugels, J. Cornelissen, A. J. M. Heuts, E. M. van der Hulst, R. R. W. J. Tuinder, S. M. H. Breast Cancer Res Treat Clinical Trial PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the level of sensible impairment after mastectomy or implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR). In addition, factors influencing breast sensibility were evaluated. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in Maastricht University Medical Center between July 2016 and August 2018. Women with unilateral mastectomy with or without IBBR were included. Objective sensory measurements were performed using Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments. Their healthy breast served as control, using a paired t test. Differences between mastectomy with and without IBBR were evaluated using the independent t test. Linear regression was performed to evaluate the association between patient characteristics on breast sensibility. The paired t test was used to evaluate in which part of the breast the sensibility is best preserved. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were eligible for inclusion. Sixteen patients underwent IBBR after mastectomy. Twenty-three patients received radiotherapy and 35 patients received chemotherapy. Monofilament values were significantly higher in the operated group compared to the reference group (p < 0.001). Linear regression showed a statistically significant association between IBBR and objectively measured impaired sensation (p = 0.008). After mastectomy, the cutaneous protective sensation is only diminished. After IBBR, it is lost in the majority of the breast. The medial part of the breast was significantly more sensitive than the lateral part in all operated breasts (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: IBBR has a significantly negative impact on the breast sensibility compared to mastectomy alone. This study shows that the protective sensation of the skin in the breast is lost after IBBR. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the level of sensible impairment after mastectomy or IBBR. More research is necessary to confirm these results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-019-05137-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-02-12 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6533215/ /pubmed/30746634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05137-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Clinical Trial
Bijkerk, E.
van Kuijk, S. M. J.
Beugels, J.
Cornelissen, A. J. M.
Heuts, E. M.
van der Hulst, R. R. W. J.
Tuinder, S. M. H.
Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction
title Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction
title_full Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction
title_fullStr Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction
title_short Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction
title_sort breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction
topic Clinical Trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30746634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05137-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bijkerke breastsensibilityaftermastectomyandimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT vankuijksmj breastsensibilityaftermastectomyandimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT beugelsj breastsensibilityaftermastectomyandimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT cornelissenajm breastsensibilityaftermastectomyandimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT heutsem breastsensibilityaftermastectomyandimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT vanderhulstrrwj breastsensibilityaftermastectomyandimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT tuindersmh breastsensibilityaftermastectomyandimplantbasedbreastreconstruction