Cargando…
Points-to-consider on the return of results in epigenetic research
As epigenetic studies become more common and lead to new insights into health and disease, the return of individual epigenetic results to research participants, in particular in large-scale epigenomic studies, will be of growing importance. Members of the International Human Epigenome Consortium (IH...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31122281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0646-6 |
_version_ | 1783421249694728192 |
---|---|
author | Dyke, Stephanie O. M. Saulnier, Katie M. Dupras, Charles Webster, Amy P. Maschke, Karen Rothstein, Mark Siebert, Reiner Walter, Jörn Beck, Stephan Pastinen, Tomi Joly, Yann |
author_facet | Dyke, Stephanie O. M. Saulnier, Katie M. Dupras, Charles Webster, Amy P. Maschke, Karen Rothstein, Mark Siebert, Reiner Walter, Jörn Beck, Stephan Pastinen, Tomi Joly, Yann |
author_sort | Dyke, Stephanie O. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | As epigenetic studies become more common and lead to new insights into health and disease, the return of individual epigenetic results to research participants, in particular in large-scale epigenomic studies, will be of growing importance. Members of the International Human Epigenome Consortium (IHEC) Bioethics Workgroup considered the potential ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) involved in returning epigenetic research results and incidental findings in order to produce a set of ‘Points-to-consider’ (P-t-C) for the epigenetics research community. These P-t-C draw on existing guidance on the return of genetic research results, while also integrating the IHEC Bioethics Workgroup’s ELSI research on and discussion of the issues associated with epigenetic data as well as the experience of a return of results pilot study by the Personal Genome Project UK (PGP-UK). Major challenges include how to determine the clinical validity and actionability of epigenetic results, and considerations related to environmental exposures and epigenetic marks, including circumstances warranting the sharing of results with family members and third parties. Interdisciplinary collaboration and good public communication regarding epigenetic risk will be important to advance the return of results framework for epigenetic science. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6533659 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65336592019-05-29 Points-to-consider on the return of results in epigenetic research Dyke, Stephanie O. M. Saulnier, Katie M. Dupras, Charles Webster, Amy P. Maschke, Karen Rothstein, Mark Siebert, Reiner Walter, Jörn Beck, Stephan Pastinen, Tomi Joly, Yann Genome Med Opinion As epigenetic studies become more common and lead to new insights into health and disease, the return of individual epigenetic results to research participants, in particular in large-scale epigenomic studies, will be of growing importance. Members of the International Human Epigenome Consortium (IHEC) Bioethics Workgroup considered the potential ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) involved in returning epigenetic research results and incidental findings in order to produce a set of ‘Points-to-consider’ (P-t-C) for the epigenetics research community. These P-t-C draw on existing guidance on the return of genetic research results, while also integrating the IHEC Bioethics Workgroup’s ELSI research on and discussion of the issues associated with epigenetic data as well as the experience of a return of results pilot study by the Personal Genome Project UK (PGP-UK). Major challenges include how to determine the clinical validity and actionability of epigenetic results, and considerations related to environmental exposures and epigenetic marks, including circumstances warranting the sharing of results with family members and third parties. Interdisciplinary collaboration and good public communication regarding epigenetic risk will be important to advance the return of results framework for epigenetic science. BioMed Central 2019-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6533659/ /pubmed/31122281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0646-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Opinion Dyke, Stephanie O. M. Saulnier, Katie M. Dupras, Charles Webster, Amy P. Maschke, Karen Rothstein, Mark Siebert, Reiner Walter, Jörn Beck, Stephan Pastinen, Tomi Joly, Yann Points-to-consider on the return of results in epigenetic research |
title | Points-to-consider on the return of results in epigenetic research |
title_full | Points-to-consider on the return of results in epigenetic research |
title_fullStr | Points-to-consider on the return of results in epigenetic research |
title_full_unstemmed | Points-to-consider on the return of results in epigenetic research |
title_short | Points-to-consider on the return of results in epigenetic research |
title_sort | points-to-consider on the return of results in epigenetic research |
topic | Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31122281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0646-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dykestephanieom pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch AT saulnierkatiem pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch AT duprascharles pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch AT websteramyp pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch AT maschkekaren pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch AT rothsteinmark pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch AT siebertreiner pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch AT walterjorn pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch AT beckstephan pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch AT pastinentomi pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch AT jolyyann pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch |