Cargando…

Points-to-consider on the return of results in epigenetic research

As epigenetic studies become more common and lead to new insights into health and disease, the return of individual epigenetic results to research participants, in particular in large-scale epigenomic studies, will be of growing importance. Members of the International Human Epigenome Consortium (IH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dyke, Stephanie O. M., Saulnier, Katie M., Dupras, Charles, Webster, Amy P., Maschke, Karen, Rothstein, Mark, Siebert, Reiner, Walter, Jörn, Beck, Stephan, Pastinen, Tomi, Joly, Yann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31122281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0646-6
_version_ 1783421249694728192
author Dyke, Stephanie O. M.
Saulnier, Katie M.
Dupras, Charles
Webster, Amy P.
Maschke, Karen
Rothstein, Mark
Siebert, Reiner
Walter, Jörn
Beck, Stephan
Pastinen, Tomi
Joly, Yann
author_facet Dyke, Stephanie O. M.
Saulnier, Katie M.
Dupras, Charles
Webster, Amy P.
Maschke, Karen
Rothstein, Mark
Siebert, Reiner
Walter, Jörn
Beck, Stephan
Pastinen, Tomi
Joly, Yann
author_sort Dyke, Stephanie O. M.
collection PubMed
description As epigenetic studies become more common and lead to new insights into health and disease, the return of individual epigenetic results to research participants, in particular in large-scale epigenomic studies, will be of growing importance. Members of the International Human Epigenome Consortium (IHEC) Bioethics Workgroup considered the potential ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) involved in returning epigenetic research results and incidental findings in order to produce a set of ‘Points-to-consider’ (P-t-C) for the epigenetics research community. These P-t-C draw on existing guidance on the return of genetic research results, while also integrating the IHEC Bioethics Workgroup’s ELSI research on and discussion of the issues associated with epigenetic data as well as the experience of a return of results pilot study by the Personal Genome Project UK (PGP-UK). Major challenges include how to determine the clinical validity and actionability of epigenetic results, and considerations related to environmental exposures and epigenetic marks, including circumstances warranting the sharing of results with family members and third parties. Interdisciplinary collaboration and good public communication regarding epigenetic risk will be important to advance the return of results framework for epigenetic science.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6533659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65336592019-05-29 Points-to-consider on the return of results in epigenetic research Dyke, Stephanie O. M. Saulnier, Katie M. Dupras, Charles Webster, Amy P. Maschke, Karen Rothstein, Mark Siebert, Reiner Walter, Jörn Beck, Stephan Pastinen, Tomi Joly, Yann Genome Med Opinion As epigenetic studies become more common and lead to new insights into health and disease, the return of individual epigenetic results to research participants, in particular in large-scale epigenomic studies, will be of growing importance. Members of the International Human Epigenome Consortium (IHEC) Bioethics Workgroup considered the potential ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) involved in returning epigenetic research results and incidental findings in order to produce a set of ‘Points-to-consider’ (P-t-C) for the epigenetics research community. These P-t-C draw on existing guidance on the return of genetic research results, while also integrating the IHEC Bioethics Workgroup’s ELSI research on and discussion of the issues associated with epigenetic data as well as the experience of a return of results pilot study by the Personal Genome Project UK (PGP-UK). Major challenges include how to determine the clinical validity and actionability of epigenetic results, and considerations related to environmental exposures and epigenetic marks, including circumstances warranting the sharing of results with family members and third parties. Interdisciplinary collaboration and good public communication regarding epigenetic risk will be important to advance the return of results framework for epigenetic science. BioMed Central 2019-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6533659/ /pubmed/31122281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0646-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Opinion
Dyke, Stephanie O. M.
Saulnier, Katie M.
Dupras, Charles
Webster, Amy P.
Maschke, Karen
Rothstein, Mark
Siebert, Reiner
Walter, Jörn
Beck, Stephan
Pastinen, Tomi
Joly, Yann
Points-to-consider on the return of results in epigenetic research
title Points-to-consider on the return of results in epigenetic research
title_full Points-to-consider on the return of results in epigenetic research
title_fullStr Points-to-consider on the return of results in epigenetic research
title_full_unstemmed Points-to-consider on the return of results in epigenetic research
title_short Points-to-consider on the return of results in epigenetic research
title_sort points-to-consider on the return of results in epigenetic research
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31122281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0646-6
work_keys_str_mv AT dykestephanieom pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch
AT saulnierkatiem pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch
AT duprascharles pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch
AT websteramyp pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch
AT maschkekaren pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch
AT rothsteinmark pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch
AT siebertreiner pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch
AT walterjorn pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch
AT beckstephan pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch
AT pastinentomi pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch
AT jolyyann pointstoconsideronthereturnofresultsinepigeneticresearch