Cargando…

Pazopanib has equivalent anti-tumor effectiveness and lower Total costs than Sunitinib for treating metastatic or advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Sunitinib and pazopanib are extensively used as first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We performed this meta-analysis to assess the anti-tumor effectiveness, toxicity, and total costs of the two drugs among patients with mRCC/advanced RCC (aRCC). Materials and M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deng, Huan, Huang, Yu, Hong, Zhengdong, Yuan, Xuhui, Cao, Zhi, Wei, Yiping, Zhang, Wenxiong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31122210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5704-3
_version_ 1783421256826093568
author Deng, Huan
Huang, Yu
Hong, Zhengdong
Yuan, Xuhui
Cao, Zhi
Wei, Yiping
Zhang, Wenxiong
author_facet Deng, Huan
Huang, Yu
Hong, Zhengdong
Yuan, Xuhui
Cao, Zhi
Wei, Yiping
Zhang, Wenxiong
author_sort Deng, Huan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sunitinib and pazopanib are extensively used as first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We performed this meta-analysis to assess the anti-tumor effectiveness, toxicity, and total costs of the two drugs among patients with mRCC/advanced RCC (aRCC). Materials and Methods: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched to obtain eligible articles. The endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse effects (AEs), and per-patient-per-month (PPPM) costs. RESULTS: We included 14 medium- to high-quality studies. Both drugs were valid for mRCC/aRCC, with equivalent PFS (hazard ratio (HR) =1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98–1.15, P = 0.13), OS (HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.79–1.07, P = 0.29), objective response rate (ORR, risk ratio (RR) =1.03, 95% CI: 0.93–1.13, p = 0.58), and disease control rate (DCR, RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.94–1.22, P = 0.54). Sunitinib had more dosage reductions and higher PPPM (weighted mean difference = − 1.50 thousand US dollars, 95% CI: − 2.27 to − 0.72, P = 0.0002). Furthermore, more incidences of severe fatigue, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia were recorded for sunitinib, but pazopanib had more liver toxicity. In subgroup analysis, studies from the US reported longer OS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77–0.95, P = 0.004) and higher ORR (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.03–1.51, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Pazopanib provides equivalent anti-tumor effectiveness and lower PPPM as compared with sunitinib for mRCC/aRCC. Great care should be given to pazopanib-treated patients with abnormal liver function. Nevertheless, more large-scale, high-quality studies are required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5704-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6533682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65336822019-05-29 Pazopanib has equivalent anti-tumor effectiveness and lower Total costs than Sunitinib for treating metastatic or advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis Deng, Huan Huang, Yu Hong, Zhengdong Yuan, Xuhui Cao, Zhi Wei, Yiping Zhang, Wenxiong BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Sunitinib and pazopanib are extensively used as first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We performed this meta-analysis to assess the anti-tumor effectiveness, toxicity, and total costs of the two drugs among patients with mRCC/advanced RCC (aRCC). Materials and Methods: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched to obtain eligible articles. The endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse effects (AEs), and per-patient-per-month (PPPM) costs. RESULTS: We included 14 medium- to high-quality studies. Both drugs were valid for mRCC/aRCC, with equivalent PFS (hazard ratio (HR) =1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98–1.15, P = 0.13), OS (HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.79–1.07, P = 0.29), objective response rate (ORR, risk ratio (RR) =1.03, 95% CI: 0.93–1.13, p = 0.58), and disease control rate (DCR, RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.94–1.22, P = 0.54). Sunitinib had more dosage reductions and higher PPPM (weighted mean difference = − 1.50 thousand US dollars, 95% CI: − 2.27 to − 0.72, P = 0.0002). Furthermore, more incidences of severe fatigue, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia were recorded for sunitinib, but pazopanib had more liver toxicity. In subgroup analysis, studies from the US reported longer OS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77–0.95, P = 0.004) and higher ORR (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.03–1.51, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Pazopanib provides equivalent anti-tumor effectiveness and lower PPPM as compared with sunitinib for mRCC/aRCC. Great care should be given to pazopanib-treated patients with abnormal liver function. Nevertheless, more large-scale, high-quality studies are required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5704-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6533682/ /pubmed/31122210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5704-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Deng, Huan
Huang, Yu
Hong, Zhengdong
Yuan, Xuhui
Cao, Zhi
Wei, Yiping
Zhang, Wenxiong
Pazopanib has equivalent anti-tumor effectiveness and lower Total costs than Sunitinib for treating metastatic or advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis
title Pazopanib has equivalent anti-tumor effectiveness and lower Total costs than Sunitinib for treating metastatic or advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis
title_full Pazopanib has equivalent anti-tumor effectiveness and lower Total costs than Sunitinib for treating metastatic or advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Pazopanib has equivalent anti-tumor effectiveness and lower Total costs than Sunitinib for treating metastatic or advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Pazopanib has equivalent anti-tumor effectiveness and lower Total costs than Sunitinib for treating metastatic or advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis
title_short Pazopanib has equivalent anti-tumor effectiveness and lower Total costs than Sunitinib for treating metastatic or advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis
title_sort pazopanib has equivalent anti-tumor effectiveness and lower total costs than sunitinib for treating metastatic or advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31122210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5704-3
work_keys_str_mv AT denghuan pazopanibhasequivalentantitumoreffectivenessandlowertotalcoststhansunitinibfortreatingmetastaticoradvancedrenalcellcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT huangyu pazopanibhasequivalentantitumoreffectivenessandlowertotalcoststhansunitinibfortreatingmetastaticoradvancedrenalcellcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT hongzhengdong pazopanibhasequivalentantitumoreffectivenessandlowertotalcoststhansunitinibfortreatingmetastaticoradvancedrenalcellcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT yuanxuhui pazopanibhasequivalentantitumoreffectivenessandlowertotalcoststhansunitinibfortreatingmetastaticoradvancedrenalcellcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT caozhi pazopanibhasequivalentantitumoreffectivenessandlowertotalcoststhansunitinibfortreatingmetastaticoradvancedrenalcellcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT weiyiping pazopanibhasequivalentantitumoreffectivenessandlowertotalcoststhansunitinibfortreatingmetastaticoradvancedrenalcellcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT zhangwenxiong pazopanibhasequivalentantitumoreffectivenessandlowertotalcoststhansunitinibfortreatingmetastaticoradvancedrenalcellcarcinomaametaanalysis