Cargando…

Psychological interventions for people with psychotic experiences: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Many people who have common mental disorders, such as depression and anxiety, also have some psychotic experiences. These experiences are associated with higher clinical complexity, poor treatment response, and negative clinical outcomes. Psychological interventions have the potential to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soneson, Emma, Russo, Debra, Knight, Clare, Lafortune, Louise, Heslin, Margaret, Stochl, Jan, Georgiadis, Alex, Galante, Julieta, Duschinsky, Robbie, Grey, Nick, Gonzalez-Blanco, Leticia, Couche, Juliet, Griffiths, Michelle, Murray, Hannah, Reeve, Nesta, Hodgekins, Joanne, French, Paul, Fowler, David, Byford, Sarah, Dixon-Woods, Mary, Jones, Peter B., Perez, Jesus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31122287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1041-5
_version_ 1783421259214749696
author Soneson, Emma
Russo, Debra
Knight, Clare
Lafortune, Louise
Heslin, Margaret
Stochl, Jan
Georgiadis, Alex
Galante, Julieta
Duschinsky, Robbie
Grey, Nick
Gonzalez-Blanco, Leticia
Couche, Juliet
Griffiths, Michelle
Murray, Hannah
Reeve, Nesta
Hodgekins, Joanne
French, Paul
Fowler, David
Byford, Sarah
Dixon-Woods, Mary
Jones, Peter B.
Perez, Jesus
author_facet Soneson, Emma
Russo, Debra
Knight, Clare
Lafortune, Louise
Heslin, Margaret
Stochl, Jan
Georgiadis, Alex
Galante, Julieta
Duschinsky, Robbie
Grey, Nick
Gonzalez-Blanco, Leticia
Couche, Juliet
Griffiths, Michelle
Murray, Hannah
Reeve, Nesta
Hodgekins, Joanne
French, Paul
Fowler, David
Byford, Sarah
Dixon-Woods, Mary
Jones, Peter B.
Perez, Jesus
author_sort Soneson, Emma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many people who have common mental disorders, such as depression and anxiety, also have some psychotic experiences. These experiences are associated with higher clinical complexity, poor treatment response, and negative clinical outcomes. Psychological interventions have the potential to improve outcomes for people with psychotic experiences. The aims of this systematic review are to (1) synthesise the evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of psychological interventions to reduce psychotic experiences and their associated distress and (2) identify key components of effective interventions. METHODS: Our search strategy will combine terms for (1) psychological interventions, (2) psychotic experiences, and (3) symptoms associated with psychotic experiences. We will search the following online databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, all Cochrane databases, British Nursing Index (BNI), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC), Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), and EconLit. Our primary outcome is the proportion of people who recovered or remitted from psychotic experiences after the intervention. Our secondary outcomes are changes in positive psychotic symptoms, negative psychotic symptoms, depression, anxiety, functioning (including social, occupational, and academic), quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. Two independent reviewers will judge each study against pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria and will extract study characteristics, outcome data, and intervention components. Risk of bias and methodological quality will be assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies and the Drummond Checklist. Results will be synthesised using random-effects meta-analysis and narrative synthesis. DISCUSSION: The identification of effective psychological interventions and of specific components associated with intervention effectiveness will augment existing evidence that can inform the development of a new, tailored intervention to improve outcomes related to psychotic symptoms, anxiety and depression, distress, functioning, and quality of life. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016033869
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6533690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65336902019-05-29 Psychological interventions for people with psychotic experiences: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Soneson, Emma Russo, Debra Knight, Clare Lafortune, Louise Heslin, Margaret Stochl, Jan Georgiadis, Alex Galante, Julieta Duschinsky, Robbie Grey, Nick Gonzalez-Blanco, Leticia Couche, Juliet Griffiths, Michelle Murray, Hannah Reeve, Nesta Hodgekins, Joanne French, Paul Fowler, David Byford, Sarah Dixon-Woods, Mary Jones, Peter B. Perez, Jesus Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Many people who have common mental disorders, such as depression and anxiety, also have some psychotic experiences. These experiences are associated with higher clinical complexity, poor treatment response, and negative clinical outcomes. Psychological interventions have the potential to improve outcomes for people with psychotic experiences. The aims of this systematic review are to (1) synthesise the evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of psychological interventions to reduce psychotic experiences and their associated distress and (2) identify key components of effective interventions. METHODS: Our search strategy will combine terms for (1) psychological interventions, (2) psychotic experiences, and (3) symptoms associated with psychotic experiences. We will search the following online databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, all Cochrane databases, British Nursing Index (BNI), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC), Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), and EconLit. Our primary outcome is the proportion of people who recovered or remitted from psychotic experiences after the intervention. Our secondary outcomes are changes in positive psychotic symptoms, negative psychotic symptoms, depression, anxiety, functioning (including social, occupational, and academic), quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. Two independent reviewers will judge each study against pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria and will extract study characteristics, outcome data, and intervention components. Risk of bias and methodological quality will be assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies and the Drummond Checklist. Results will be synthesised using random-effects meta-analysis and narrative synthesis. DISCUSSION: The identification of effective psychological interventions and of specific components associated with intervention effectiveness will augment existing evidence that can inform the development of a new, tailored intervention to improve outcomes related to psychotic symptoms, anxiety and depression, distress, functioning, and quality of life. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016033869 BioMed Central 2019-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6533690/ /pubmed/31122287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1041-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Soneson, Emma
Russo, Debra
Knight, Clare
Lafortune, Louise
Heslin, Margaret
Stochl, Jan
Georgiadis, Alex
Galante, Julieta
Duschinsky, Robbie
Grey, Nick
Gonzalez-Blanco, Leticia
Couche, Juliet
Griffiths, Michelle
Murray, Hannah
Reeve, Nesta
Hodgekins, Joanne
French, Paul
Fowler, David
Byford, Sarah
Dixon-Woods, Mary
Jones, Peter B.
Perez, Jesus
Psychological interventions for people with psychotic experiences: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Psychological interventions for people with psychotic experiences: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Psychological interventions for people with psychotic experiences: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Psychological interventions for people with psychotic experiences: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Psychological interventions for people with psychotic experiences: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Psychological interventions for people with psychotic experiences: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort psychological interventions for people with psychotic experiences: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31122287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1041-5
work_keys_str_mv AT sonesonemma psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT russodebra psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT knightclare psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lafortunelouise psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT heslinmargaret psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT stochljan psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT georgiadisalex psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT galantejulieta psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT duschinskyrobbie psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT greynick psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gonzalezblancoleticia psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT couchejuliet psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT griffithsmichelle psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT murrayhannah psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT reevenesta psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hodgekinsjoanne psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT frenchpaul psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fowlerdavid psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT byfordsarah psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dixonwoodsmary psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jonespeterb psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT perezjesus psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis