Cargando…
Psychological interventions for people with psychotic experiences: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Many people who have common mental disorders, such as depression and anxiety, also have some psychotic experiences. These experiences are associated with higher clinical complexity, poor treatment response, and negative clinical outcomes. Psychological interventions have the potential to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31122287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1041-5 |
_version_ | 1783421259214749696 |
---|---|
author | Soneson, Emma Russo, Debra Knight, Clare Lafortune, Louise Heslin, Margaret Stochl, Jan Georgiadis, Alex Galante, Julieta Duschinsky, Robbie Grey, Nick Gonzalez-Blanco, Leticia Couche, Juliet Griffiths, Michelle Murray, Hannah Reeve, Nesta Hodgekins, Joanne French, Paul Fowler, David Byford, Sarah Dixon-Woods, Mary Jones, Peter B. Perez, Jesus |
author_facet | Soneson, Emma Russo, Debra Knight, Clare Lafortune, Louise Heslin, Margaret Stochl, Jan Georgiadis, Alex Galante, Julieta Duschinsky, Robbie Grey, Nick Gonzalez-Blanco, Leticia Couche, Juliet Griffiths, Michelle Murray, Hannah Reeve, Nesta Hodgekins, Joanne French, Paul Fowler, David Byford, Sarah Dixon-Woods, Mary Jones, Peter B. Perez, Jesus |
author_sort | Soneson, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many people who have common mental disorders, such as depression and anxiety, also have some psychotic experiences. These experiences are associated with higher clinical complexity, poor treatment response, and negative clinical outcomes. Psychological interventions have the potential to improve outcomes for people with psychotic experiences. The aims of this systematic review are to (1) synthesise the evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of psychological interventions to reduce psychotic experiences and their associated distress and (2) identify key components of effective interventions. METHODS: Our search strategy will combine terms for (1) psychological interventions, (2) psychotic experiences, and (3) symptoms associated with psychotic experiences. We will search the following online databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, all Cochrane databases, British Nursing Index (BNI), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC), Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), and EconLit. Our primary outcome is the proportion of people who recovered or remitted from psychotic experiences after the intervention. Our secondary outcomes are changes in positive psychotic symptoms, negative psychotic symptoms, depression, anxiety, functioning (including social, occupational, and academic), quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. Two independent reviewers will judge each study against pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria and will extract study characteristics, outcome data, and intervention components. Risk of bias and methodological quality will be assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies and the Drummond Checklist. Results will be synthesised using random-effects meta-analysis and narrative synthesis. DISCUSSION: The identification of effective psychological interventions and of specific components associated with intervention effectiveness will augment existing evidence that can inform the development of a new, tailored intervention to improve outcomes related to psychotic symptoms, anxiety and depression, distress, functioning, and quality of life. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016033869 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6533690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65336902019-05-29 Psychological interventions for people with psychotic experiences: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Soneson, Emma Russo, Debra Knight, Clare Lafortune, Louise Heslin, Margaret Stochl, Jan Georgiadis, Alex Galante, Julieta Duschinsky, Robbie Grey, Nick Gonzalez-Blanco, Leticia Couche, Juliet Griffiths, Michelle Murray, Hannah Reeve, Nesta Hodgekins, Joanne French, Paul Fowler, David Byford, Sarah Dixon-Woods, Mary Jones, Peter B. Perez, Jesus Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Many people who have common mental disorders, such as depression and anxiety, also have some psychotic experiences. These experiences are associated with higher clinical complexity, poor treatment response, and negative clinical outcomes. Psychological interventions have the potential to improve outcomes for people with psychotic experiences. The aims of this systematic review are to (1) synthesise the evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of psychological interventions to reduce psychotic experiences and their associated distress and (2) identify key components of effective interventions. METHODS: Our search strategy will combine terms for (1) psychological interventions, (2) psychotic experiences, and (3) symptoms associated with psychotic experiences. We will search the following online databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, all Cochrane databases, British Nursing Index (BNI), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC), Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), and EconLit. Our primary outcome is the proportion of people who recovered or remitted from psychotic experiences after the intervention. Our secondary outcomes are changes in positive psychotic symptoms, negative psychotic symptoms, depression, anxiety, functioning (including social, occupational, and academic), quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. Two independent reviewers will judge each study against pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria and will extract study characteristics, outcome data, and intervention components. Risk of bias and methodological quality will be assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies and the Drummond Checklist. Results will be synthesised using random-effects meta-analysis and narrative synthesis. DISCUSSION: The identification of effective psychological interventions and of specific components associated with intervention effectiveness will augment existing evidence that can inform the development of a new, tailored intervention to improve outcomes related to psychotic symptoms, anxiety and depression, distress, functioning, and quality of life. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016033869 BioMed Central 2019-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6533690/ /pubmed/31122287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1041-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Soneson, Emma Russo, Debra Knight, Clare Lafortune, Louise Heslin, Margaret Stochl, Jan Georgiadis, Alex Galante, Julieta Duschinsky, Robbie Grey, Nick Gonzalez-Blanco, Leticia Couche, Juliet Griffiths, Michelle Murray, Hannah Reeve, Nesta Hodgekins, Joanne French, Paul Fowler, David Byford, Sarah Dixon-Woods, Mary Jones, Peter B. Perez, Jesus Psychological interventions for people with psychotic experiences: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Psychological interventions for people with psychotic experiences: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Psychological interventions for people with psychotic experiences: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Psychological interventions for people with psychotic experiences: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychological interventions for people with psychotic experiences: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Psychological interventions for people with psychotic experiences: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | psychological interventions for people with psychotic experiences: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31122287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1041-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sonesonemma psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT russodebra psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT knightclare psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lafortunelouise psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT heslinmargaret psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT stochljan psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT georgiadisalex psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT galantejulieta psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT duschinskyrobbie psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT greynick psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gonzalezblancoleticia psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT couchejuliet psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT griffithsmichelle psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT murrayhannah psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT reevenesta psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hodgekinsjoanne psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT frenchpaul psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fowlerdavid psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT byfordsarah psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dixonwoodsmary psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jonespeterb psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT perezjesus psychologicalinterventionsforpeoplewithpsychoticexperiencesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |