Cargando…

Mendelian Inconsistent Signatures from 1314 Ancestrally Diverse Family Trios Distinguish Biological Variation from Sequencing Error

Next-generation sequencing enables advances in the clinical application of genomics by providing high-throughput detection of genomic variation. However, next-generation sequencing technologies, especially whole-genome sequencing (WGS), are often associated with a high false-positive rate. Trio-base...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kothiyal, Prachi, Wong, Wendy S.W., Bodian, Dale L., Niederhuber, John E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30942611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2018.0253
_version_ 1783421288952365056
author Kothiyal, Prachi
Wong, Wendy S.W.
Bodian, Dale L.
Niederhuber, John E.
author_facet Kothiyal, Prachi
Wong, Wendy S.W.
Bodian, Dale L.
Niederhuber, John E.
author_sort Kothiyal, Prachi
collection PubMed
description Next-generation sequencing enables advances in the clinical application of genomics by providing high-throughput detection of genomic variation. However, next-generation sequencing technologies, especially whole-genome sequencing (WGS), are often associated with a high false-positive rate. Trio-based WGS can contribute significantly towards improved quality control methods. Mendelian-inconsistent calls (MIC) in parent–child trios are commonly attributed to erroneous sequencing calls, as the true de novo mutation rate is extremely low compared with MIC incidence. Here, we analyzed WGS data from 1314 mother, father, and child trios across ethnically diverse populations with the goal of characterizing MIC. Genotype calls in a trio can be used to assign different signatures to MIC. MIC occur more frequently within repeats but show varying distribution and error mechanisms across repeat types. MIC are enriched within poly-A/T runs in short interspersed nuclear elements. Alignability scores, allele balance, and relative parental read depth vary among MIC signatures and these differences should be considered when designing filters for MIC reduction. MIC cluster in germline deletions and these MIC also segregate with population. Our results provide a basis for making decisions on how each MIC type should be evaluated before discarding them as errors or including them in alternative applications. With the reduction of sequencing cost, family trio whole genome and exome analysis are being performed more routinely in clinical practice. We provide a reference that can be used for annotating MIC with their frequencies in a larger population to aid in the filtering of candidate de novo mutations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6533806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65338062019-05-28 Mendelian Inconsistent Signatures from 1314 Ancestrally Diverse Family Trios Distinguish Biological Variation from Sequencing Error Kothiyal, Prachi Wong, Wendy S.W. Bodian, Dale L. Niederhuber, John E. J Comput Biol Research Articles Next-generation sequencing enables advances in the clinical application of genomics by providing high-throughput detection of genomic variation. However, next-generation sequencing technologies, especially whole-genome sequencing (WGS), are often associated with a high false-positive rate. Trio-based WGS can contribute significantly towards improved quality control methods. Mendelian-inconsistent calls (MIC) in parent–child trios are commonly attributed to erroneous sequencing calls, as the true de novo mutation rate is extremely low compared with MIC incidence. Here, we analyzed WGS data from 1314 mother, father, and child trios across ethnically diverse populations with the goal of characterizing MIC. Genotype calls in a trio can be used to assign different signatures to MIC. MIC occur more frequently within repeats but show varying distribution and error mechanisms across repeat types. MIC are enriched within poly-A/T runs in short interspersed nuclear elements. Alignability scores, allele balance, and relative parental read depth vary among MIC signatures and these differences should be considered when designing filters for MIC reduction. MIC cluster in germline deletions and these MIC also segregate with population. Our results provide a basis for making decisions on how each MIC type should be evaluated before discarding them as errors or including them in alternative applications. With the reduction of sequencing cost, family trio whole genome and exome analysis are being performed more routinely in clinical practice. We provide a reference that can be used for annotating MIC with their frequencies in a larger population to aid in the filtering of candidate de novo mutations. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2019-05-01 2019-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6533806/ /pubmed/30942611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2018.0253 Text en © Prachi Kothiyal, et al., 2019. Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Kothiyal, Prachi
Wong, Wendy S.W.
Bodian, Dale L.
Niederhuber, John E.
Mendelian Inconsistent Signatures from 1314 Ancestrally Diverse Family Trios Distinguish Biological Variation from Sequencing Error
title Mendelian Inconsistent Signatures from 1314 Ancestrally Diverse Family Trios Distinguish Biological Variation from Sequencing Error
title_full Mendelian Inconsistent Signatures from 1314 Ancestrally Diverse Family Trios Distinguish Biological Variation from Sequencing Error
title_fullStr Mendelian Inconsistent Signatures from 1314 Ancestrally Diverse Family Trios Distinguish Biological Variation from Sequencing Error
title_full_unstemmed Mendelian Inconsistent Signatures from 1314 Ancestrally Diverse Family Trios Distinguish Biological Variation from Sequencing Error
title_short Mendelian Inconsistent Signatures from 1314 Ancestrally Diverse Family Trios Distinguish Biological Variation from Sequencing Error
title_sort mendelian inconsistent signatures from 1314 ancestrally diverse family trios distinguish biological variation from sequencing error
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30942611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2018.0253
work_keys_str_mv AT kothiyalprachi mendelianinconsistentsignaturesfrom1314ancestrallydiversefamilytriosdistinguishbiologicalvariationfromsequencingerror
AT wongwendysw mendelianinconsistentsignaturesfrom1314ancestrallydiversefamilytriosdistinguishbiologicalvariationfromsequencingerror
AT bodiandalel mendelianinconsistentsignaturesfrom1314ancestrallydiversefamilytriosdistinguishbiologicalvariationfromsequencingerror
AT niederhuberjohne mendelianinconsistentsignaturesfrom1314ancestrallydiversefamilytriosdistinguishbiologicalvariationfromsequencingerror