Cargando…
Test–Retest Reliability of the Effects of Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation
OBJECTIVES: The utility of continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) as index of cortical plasticity is limited by inadequate characterization of its test–retest reliability. We thus evaluated the reliability of cTBS aftereffects, and explored the roles of age and common single-nucleotide polymorphi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00447 |
_version_ | 1783421290046029824 |
---|---|
author | Jannati, Ali Fried, Peter J. Block, Gabrielle Oberman, Lindsay M. Rotenberg, Alexander Pascual-Leone, Alvaro |
author_facet | Jannati, Ali Fried, Peter J. Block, Gabrielle Oberman, Lindsay M. Rotenberg, Alexander Pascual-Leone, Alvaro |
author_sort | Jannati, Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The utility of continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) as index of cortical plasticity is limited by inadequate characterization of its test–retest reliability. We thus evaluated the reliability of cTBS aftereffects, and explored the roles of age and common single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genes. METHODS: Twenty-eight healthy adults (age range 21–65) underwent two identical cTBS sessions (median interval = 9.5 days) targeting the motor cortex. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the log-transformed, baseline-corrected amplitude of motor evoked potentials (ΔMEP) at 5–60 min post-cTBS (T5–T60) were calculated. Adjusted effect sizes for cTBS aftereffects were then calculated by taking into account the reliability of each cTBS measure. RESULTS: ΔMEP at T50 was the most-reliable cTBS measure in the whole sample (ICC = 0.53). Area under-the-curve (AUC) of ΔMEPs was most reliable when calculated over the full 60 min post-cTBS (ICC = 0.40). cTBS measures were substantially more reliable in younger participants (< 35 years) and in those with BDNF Val66Val and APOE ε4– genotypes. CONCLUSION: cTBS aftereffects are most reliable when assessed 50 min post-cTBS, or when cumulative ΔMEP measures are calculated over 30–60 min post-cTBS. Reliability of cTBS aftereffects is influenced by age, and BDNF and APOE polymorphisms. Reliability coefficients are used to adjust effect-size calculations for interpretation and planning of cTBS studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6533847 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65338472019-05-31 Test–Retest Reliability of the Effects of Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation Jannati, Ali Fried, Peter J. Block, Gabrielle Oberman, Lindsay M. Rotenberg, Alexander Pascual-Leone, Alvaro Front Neurosci Neuroscience OBJECTIVES: The utility of continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) as index of cortical plasticity is limited by inadequate characterization of its test–retest reliability. We thus evaluated the reliability of cTBS aftereffects, and explored the roles of age and common single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genes. METHODS: Twenty-eight healthy adults (age range 21–65) underwent two identical cTBS sessions (median interval = 9.5 days) targeting the motor cortex. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the log-transformed, baseline-corrected amplitude of motor evoked potentials (ΔMEP) at 5–60 min post-cTBS (T5–T60) were calculated. Adjusted effect sizes for cTBS aftereffects were then calculated by taking into account the reliability of each cTBS measure. RESULTS: ΔMEP at T50 was the most-reliable cTBS measure in the whole sample (ICC = 0.53). Area under-the-curve (AUC) of ΔMEPs was most reliable when calculated over the full 60 min post-cTBS (ICC = 0.40). cTBS measures were substantially more reliable in younger participants (< 35 years) and in those with BDNF Val66Val and APOE ε4– genotypes. CONCLUSION: cTBS aftereffects are most reliable when assessed 50 min post-cTBS, or when cumulative ΔMEP measures are calculated over 30–60 min post-cTBS. Reliability of cTBS aftereffects is influenced by age, and BDNF and APOE polymorphisms. Reliability coefficients are used to adjust effect-size calculations for interpretation and planning of cTBS studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6533847/ /pubmed/31156361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00447 Text en Copyright © 2019 Jannati, Fried, Block, Oberman, Rotenberg and Pascual-Leone. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Jannati, Ali Fried, Peter J. Block, Gabrielle Oberman, Lindsay M. Rotenberg, Alexander Pascual-Leone, Alvaro Test–Retest Reliability of the Effects of Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation |
title | Test–Retest Reliability of the Effects of Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation |
title_full | Test–Retest Reliability of the Effects of Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation |
title_fullStr | Test–Retest Reliability of the Effects of Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Test–Retest Reliability of the Effects of Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation |
title_short | Test–Retest Reliability of the Effects of Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation |
title_sort | test–retest reliability of the effects of continuous theta-burst stimulation |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00447 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jannatiali testretestreliabilityoftheeffectsofcontinuousthetaburststimulation AT friedpeterj testretestreliabilityoftheeffectsofcontinuousthetaburststimulation AT blockgabrielle testretestreliabilityoftheeffectsofcontinuousthetaburststimulation AT obermanlindsaym testretestreliabilityoftheeffectsofcontinuousthetaburststimulation AT rotenbergalexander testretestreliabilityoftheeffectsofcontinuousthetaburststimulation AT pascualleonealvaro testretestreliabilityoftheeffectsofcontinuousthetaburststimulation |