Cargando…

Test–Retest Reliability of the Effects of Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation

OBJECTIVES: The utility of continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) as index of cortical plasticity is limited by inadequate characterization of its test–retest reliability. We thus evaluated the reliability of cTBS aftereffects, and explored the roles of age and common single-nucleotide polymorphi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jannati, Ali, Fried, Peter J., Block, Gabrielle, Oberman, Lindsay M., Rotenberg, Alexander, Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156361
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00447
_version_ 1783421290046029824
author Jannati, Ali
Fried, Peter J.
Block, Gabrielle
Oberman, Lindsay M.
Rotenberg, Alexander
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
author_facet Jannati, Ali
Fried, Peter J.
Block, Gabrielle
Oberman, Lindsay M.
Rotenberg, Alexander
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
author_sort Jannati, Ali
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The utility of continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) as index of cortical plasticity is limited by inadequate characterization of its test–retest reliability. We thus evaluated the reliability of cTBS aftereffects, and explored the roles of age and common single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genes. METHODS: Twenty-eight healthy adults (age range 21–65) underwent two identical cTBS sessions (median interval = 9.5 days) targeting the motor cortex. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the log-transformed, baseline-corrected amplitude of motor evoked potentials (ΔMEP) at 5–60 min post-cTBS (T5–T60) were calculated. Adjusted effect sizes for cTBS aftereffects were then calculated by taking into account the reliability of each cTBS measure. RESULTS: ΔMEP at T50 was the most-reliable cTBS measure in the whole sample (ICC = 0.53). Area under-the-curve (AUC) of ΔMEPs was most reliable when calculated over the full 60 min post-cTBS (ICC = 0.40). cTBS measures were substantially more reliable in younger participants (< 35 years) and in those with BDNF Val66Val and APOE ε4– genotypes. CONCLUSION: cTBS aftereffects are most reliable when assessed 50 min post-cTBS, or when cumulative ΔMEP measures are calculated over 30–60 min post-cTBS. Reliability of cTBS aftereffects is influenced by age, and BDNF and APOE polymorphisms. Reliability coefficients are used to adjust effect-size calculations for interpretation and planning of cTBS studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6533847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65338472019-05-31 Test–Retest Reliability of the Effects of Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation Jannati, Ali Fried, Peter J. Block, Gabrielle Oberman, Lindsay M. Rotenberg, Alexander Pascual-Leone, Alvaro Front Neurosci Neuroscience OBJECTIVES: The utility of continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) as index of cortical plasticity is limited by inadequate characterization of its test–retest reliability. We thus evaluated the reliability of cTBS aftereffects, and explored the roles of age and common single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genes. METHODS: Twenty-eight healthy adults (age range 21–65) underwent two identical cTBS sessions (median interval = 9.5 days) targeting the motor cortex. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the log-transformed, baseline-corrected amplitude of motor evoked potentials (ΔMEP) at 5–60 min post-cTBS (T5–T60) were calculated. Adjusted effect sizes for cTBS aftereffects were then calculated by taking into account the reliability of each cTBS measure. RESULTS: ΔMEP at T50 was the most-reliable cTBS measure in the whole sample (ICC = 0.53). Area under-the-curve (AUC) of ΔMEPs was most reliable when calculated over the full 60 min post-cTBS (ICC = 0.40). cTBS measures were substantially more reliable in younger participants (< 35 years) and in those with BDNF Val66Val and APOE ε4– genotypes. CONCLUSION: cTBS aftereffects are most reliable when assessed 50 min post-cTBS, or when cumulative ΔMEP measures are calculated over 30–60 min post-cTBS. Reliability of cTBS aftereffects is influenced by age, and BDNF and APOE polymorphisms. Reliability coefficients are used to adjust effect-size calculations for interpretation and planning of cTBS studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6533847/ /pubmed/31156361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00447 Text en Copyright © 2019 Jannati, Fried, Block, Oberman, Rotenberg and Pascual-Leone. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Jannati, Ali
Fried, Peter J.
Block, Gabrielle
Oberman, Lindsay M.
Rotenberg, Alexander
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
Test–Retest Reliability of the Effects of Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation
title Test–Retest Reliability of the Effects of Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation
title_full Test–Retest Reliability of the Effects of Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation
title_fullStr Test–Retest Reliability of the Effects of Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Test–Retest Reliability of the Effects of Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation
title_short Test–Retest Reliability of the Effects of Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation
title_sort test–retest reliability of the effects of continuous theta-burst stimulation
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156361
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00447
work_keys_str_mv AT jannatiali testretestreliabilityoftheeffectsofcontinuousthetaburststimulation
AT friedpeterj testretestreliabilityoftheeffectsofcontinuousthetaburststimulation
AT blockgabrielle testretestreliabilityoftheeffectsofcontinuousthetaburststimulation
AT obermanlindsaym testretestreliabilityoftheeffectsofcontinuousthetaburststimulation
AT rotenbergalexander testretestreliabilityoftheeffectsofcontinuousthetaburststimulation
AT pascualleonealvaro testretestreliabilityoftheeffectsofcontinuousthetaburststimulation