Cargando…

Curricular adequacy on basics of clinical trials

INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials are integral to innovation in the treatment modalities and are conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of novel drugs. Clinical trials of modern era have evolved through stern consequences and tragedies in the past. This study was designed to know knowledge on ethic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Sonu, Bansal, Ravinder Nath
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31142946
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijp.IJP_184_18
_version_ 1783421303182589952
author Gupta, Sonu
Bansal, Ravinder Nath
author_facet Gupta, Sonu
Bansal, Ravinder Nath
author_sort Gupta, Sonu
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials are integral to innovation in the treatment modalities and are conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of novel drugs. Clinical trials of modern era have evolved through stern consequences and tragedies in the past. This study was designed to know knowledge on ethics, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and tragedies in clinical trials among interns and postgraduates (PGs). METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study was carried out on graduates undergoing internship (interns) and PG residents of a medical college and a dental college from Punjab. This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 151 professionals of medical college and 100 professionals of dental colleges in Punjab with the help of a prevalidated questionnaire. The data were then analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between dental and medical doctors regarding ethics and ADRs, but a significant difference was observed among interns and PG residents, with interns having higher awareness regarding ethics and ADRs. There was no significant difference (P = 0.941) in knowledge among dental and medical doctors as well as among interns and PG residents, with P = 0.264 about tragedies in clinical trials. CONCLUSION: From the study, it can be concluded that interns and PGs do not get enough exposure to basics in clinic research such as research ethics, ADRs, and tragedies in clinical trials. It is suggested that there is a requirement for suitable modifications in the teaching curriculum at undergraduate level and regular training must be provided to professionals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6533931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65339312019-05-29 Curricular adequacy on basics of clinical trials Gupta, Sonu Bansal, Ravinder Nath Indian J Pharmacol Research Article INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials are integral to innovation in the treatment modalities and are conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of novel drugs. Clinical trials of modern era have evolved through stern consequences and tragedies in the past. This study was designed to know knowledge on ethics, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and tragedies in clinical trials among interns and postgraduates (PGs). METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study was carried out on graduates undergoing internship (interns) and PG residents of a medical college and a dental college from Punjab. This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 151 professionals of medical college and 100 professionals of dental colleges in Punjab with the help of a prevalidated questionnaire. The data were then analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between dental and medical doctors regarding ethics and ADRs, but a significant difference was observed among interns and PG residents, with interns having higher awareness regarding ethics and ADRs. There was no significant difference (P = 0.941) in knowledge among dental and medical doctors as well as among interns and PG residents, with P = 0.264 about tragedies in clinical trials. CONCLUSION: From the study, it can be concluded that interns and PGs do not get enough exposure to basics in clinic research such as research ethics, ADRs, and tragedies in clinical trials. It is suggested that there is a requirement for suitable modifications in the teaching curriculum at undergraduate level and regular training must be provided to professionals. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6533931/ /pubmed/31142946 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijp.IJP_184_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gupta, Sonu
Bansal, Ravinder Nath
Curricular adequacy on basics of clinical trials
title Curricular adequacy on basics of clinical trials
title_full Curricular adequacy on basics of clinical trials
title_fullStr Curricular adequacy on basics of clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Curricular adequacy on basics of clinical trials
title_short Curricular adequacy on basics of clinical trials
title_sort curricular adequacy on basics of clinical trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31142946
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijp.IJP_184_18
work_keys_str_mv AT guptasonu curricularadequacyonbasicsofclinicaltrials
AT bansalravindernath curricularadequacyonbasicsofclinicaltrials