Cargando…

Montreal Cognitive Assessment for cognitive assessment in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: There is evidence in the literature that cognitive impairment is more prevalent in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) than in the general population. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is an instrument with a good application profile for cognitive evaluation of patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amatneeks, Thaís Malucelli, Hamdan, Amer Cavalheiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6534019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31063176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2018-0086
_version_ 1783421329082417152
author Amatneeks, Thaís Malucelli
Hamdan, Amer Cavalheiro
author_facet Amatneeks, Thaís Malucelli
Hamdan, Amer Cavalheiro
author_sort Amatneeks, Thaís Malucelli
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is evidence in the literature that cognitive impairment is more prevalent in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) than in the general population. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is an instrument with a good application profile for cognitive evaluation of patients with CKD-like impairments. The objective of this study is to perform a systematic review of MoCA use in the context of CKD. METHOD: The keywords "Montreal Cognitive Assessment", "Kidney Disease" and "Chronic Kidney Disease" were used to search the databases. The inclusion criteria were: a) empirical articles; b) approach to cognitive impairment in CKD; c) papers in Portuguese and English. RESULTS: The studies were mostly cross-sectional, published in medical journals, with research carried out mostly in Europe. About 45% of the studies had samples of less than 150 participants and variations in the prevalence of cognitive impairment were found ranging from 28.9% to 74.6%. The cutoff point for the identification of the impairment presented variation between the studies. DISCUSSION: The results' analysis demonstrates the need for more complete studies on MoCA scoring and adaptation in its different versions. We recommend to the health professionals who will use the results in the clinical setting that the interpretation of the results be made in the light of studies more related to the context lived by the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The instrument is efficient to be used in several stages and treatment modalities of the disease. We point to the need to adapt a cut-off point for the instrument in the different translations of the instrument.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6534019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65340192019-06-17 Montreal Cognitive Assessment for cognitive assessment in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review Amatneeks, Thaís Malucelli Hamdan, Amer Cavalheiro J Bras Nefrol Review Articles INTRODUCTION: There is evidence in the literature that cognitive impairment is more prevalent in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) than in the general population. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is an instrument with a good application profile for cognitive evaluation of patients with CKD-like impairments. The objective of this study is to perform a systematic review of MoCA use in the context of CKD. METHOD: The keywords "Montreal Cognitive Assessment", "Kidney Disease" and "Chronic Kidney Disease" were used to search the databases. The inclusion criteria were: a) empirical articles; b) approach to cognitive impairment in CKD; c) papers in Portuguese and English. RESULTS: The studies were mostly cross-sectional, published in medical journals, with research carried out mostly in Europe. About 45% of the studies had samples of less than 150 participants and variations in the prevalence of cognitive impairment were found ranging from 28.9% to 74.6%. The cutoff point for the identification of the impairment presented variation between the studies. DISCUSSION: The results' analysis demonstrates the need for more complete studies on MoCA scoring and adaptation in its different versions. We recommend to the health professionals who will use the results in the clinical setting that the interpretation of the results be made in the light of studies more related to the context lived by the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The instrument is efficient to be used in several stages and treatment modalities of the disease. We point to the need to adapt a cut-off point for the instrument in the different translations of the instrument. Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia 2019-01-24 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6534019/ /pubmed/31063176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2018-0086 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Amatneeks, Thaís Malucelli
Hamdan, Amer Cavalheiro
Montreal Cognitive Assessment for cognitive assessment in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review
title Montreal Cognitive Assessment for cognitive assessment in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review
title_full Montreal Cognitive Assessment for cognitive assessment in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review
title_fullStr Montreal Cognitive Assessment for cognitive assessment in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Montreal Cognitive Assessment for cognitive assessment in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review
title_short Montreal Cognitive Assessment for cognitive assessment in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review
title_sort montreal cognitive assessment for cognitive assessment in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6534019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31063176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2018-0086
work_keys_str_mv AT amatneeksthaismalucelli montrealcognitiveassessmentforcognitiveassessmentinchronickidneydiseaseasystematicreview
AT hamdanamercavalheiro montrealcognitiveassessmentforcognitiveassessmentinchronickidneydiseaseasystematicreview