Cargando…
A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Models
As a class of discrete latent variable models, cognitive diagnostic models have been widely researched in education, psychology, and many other disciplines. Detecting and eliminating differential item functioning (DIF) items from cognitive diagnostic tests is of great importance for test fairness an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6534098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31164855 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01137 |
_version_ | 1783421349775015936 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Yanlou Yin, Hao Xin, Tao Shao, Laicheng Yuan, Lu |
author_facet | Liu, Yanlou Yin, Hao Xin, Tao Shao, Laicheng Yuan, Lu |
author_sort | Liu, Yanlou |
collection | PubMed |
description | As a class of discrete latent variable models, cognitive diagnostic models have been widely researched in education, psychology, and many other disciplines. Detecting and eliminating differential item functioning (DIF) items from cognitive diagnostic tests is of great importance for test fairness and validity. A Monte Carlo study with varying manipulated factors was carried out to investigate the performance of the Mantel-Haenszel (MH), logistic regression (LR), and Wald tests based on item-wise information, cross-product information, observed information, and sandwich-type covariance matrices (denoted by W(d), W(XPD), W(Obs), and W(Sw), respectively) for DIF detection. The results showed that (1) the W(XPD) and LR methods had the best performance in controlling Type I error rates among the six methods investigated in this study and (2) under the uniform DIF condition, when the item quality was high or medium, the power of W(XPD), W(Obs), and W(Sw) was comparable with or superior to that of MH and LR, but when the item quality was low, W(XPD), W(Obs), and W(Sw) were less powerful than MH and LR. Under the non-uniform DIF condition, the power of W(XPD), W(Obs), and W(Sw) was comparable with or higher than that of LR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6534098 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65340982019-06-04 A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Models Liu, Yanlou Yin, Hao Xin, Tao Shao, Laicheng Yuan, Lu Front Psychol Psychology As a class of discrete latent variable models, cognitive diagnostic models have been widely researched in education, psychology, and many other disciplines. Detecting and eliminating differential item functioning (DIF) items from cognitive diagnostic tests is of great importance for test fairness and validity. A Monte Carlo study with varying manipulated factors was carried out to investigate the performance of the Mantel-Haenszel (MH), logistic regression (LR), and Wald tests based on item-wise information, cross-product information, observed information, and sandwich-type covariance matrices (denoted by W(d), W(XPD), W(Obs), and W(Sw), respectively) for DIF detection. The results showed that (1) the W(XPD) and LR methods had the best performance in controlling Type I error rates among the six methods investigated in this study and (2) under the uniform DIF condition, when the item quality was high or medium, the power of W(XPD), W(Obs), and W(Sw) was comparable with or superior to that of MH and LR, but when the item quality was low, W(XPD), W(Obs), and W(Sw) were less powerful than MH and LR. Under the non-uniform DIF condition, the power of W(XPD), W(Obs), and W(Sw) was comparable with or higher than that of LR. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6534098/ /pubmed/31164855 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01137 Text en Copyright © 2019 Liu, Yin, Xin, Shao and Yuan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Liu, Yanlou Yin, Hao Xin, Tao Shao, Laicheng Yuan, Lu A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Models |
title | A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Models |
title_full | A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Models |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Models |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Models |
title_short | A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Models |
title_sort | comparison of differential item functioning detection methods in cognitive diagnostic models |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6534098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31164855 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01137 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuyanlou acomparisonofdifferentialitemfunctioningdetectionmethodsincognitivediagnosticmodels AT yinhao acomparisonofdifferentialitemfunctioningdetectionmethodsincognitivediagnosticmodels AT xintao acomparisonofdifferentialitemfunctioningdetectionmethodsincognitivediagnosticmodels AT shaolaicheng acomparisonofdifferentialitemfunctioningdetectionmethodsincognitivediagnosticmodels AT yuanlu acomparisonofdifferentialitemfunctioningdetectionmethodsincognitivediagnosticmodels AT liuyanlou comparisonofdifferentialitemfunctioningdetectionmethodsincognitivediagnosticmodels AT yinhao comparisonofdifferentialitemfunctioningdetectionmethodsincognitivediagnosticmodels AT xintao comparisonofdifferentialitemfunctioningdetectionmethodsincognitivediagnosticmodels AT shaolaicheng comparisonofdifferentialitemfunctioningdetectionmethodsincognitivediagnosticmodels AT yuanlu comparisonofdifferentialitemfunctioningdetectionmethodsincognitivediagnosticmodels |