Cargando…

A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Models

As a class of discrete latent variable models, cognitive diagnostic models have been widely researched in education, psychology, and many other disciplines. Detecting and eliminating differential item functioning (DIF) items from cognitive diagnostic tests is of great importance for test fairness an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yanlou, Yin, Hao, Xin, Tao, Shao, Laicheng, Yuan, Lu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6534098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31164855
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01137
_version_ 1783421349775015936
author Liu, Yanlou
Yin, Hao
Xin, Tao
Shao, Laicheng
Yuan, Lu
author_facet Liu, Yanlou
Yin, Hao
Xin, Tao
Shao, Laicheng
Yuan, Lu
author_sort Liu, Yanlou
collection PubMed
description As a class of discrete latent variable models, cognitive diagnostic models have been widely researched in education, psychology, and many other disciplines. Detecting and eliminating differential item functioning (DIF) items from cognitive diagnostic tests is of great importance for test fairness and validity. A Monte Carlo study with varying manipulated factors was carried out to investigate the performance of the Mantel-Haenszel (MH), logistic regression (LR), and Wald tests based on item-wise information, cross-product information, observed information, and sandwich-type covariance matrices (denoted by W(d), W(XPD), W(Obs), and W(Sw), respectively) for DIF detection. The results showed that (1) the W(XPD) and LR methods had the best performance in controlling Type I error rates among the six methods investigated in this study and (2) under the uniform DIF condition, when the item quality was high or medium, the power of W(XPD), W(Obs), and W(Sw) was comparable with or superior to that of MH and LR, but when the item quality was low, W(XPD), W(Obs), and W(Sw) were less powerful than MH and LR. Under the non-uniform DIF condition, the power of W(XPD), W(Obs), and W(Sw) was comparable with or higher than that of LR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6534098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65340982019-06-04 A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Models Liu, Yanlou Yin, Hao Xin, Tao Shao, Laicheng Yuan, Lu Front Psychol Psychology As a class of discrete latent variable models, cognitive diagnostic models have been widely researched in education, psychology, and many other disciplines. Detecting and eliminating differential item functioning (DIF) items from cognitive diagnostic tests is of great importance for test fairness and validity. A Monte Carlo study with varying manipulated factors was carried out to investigate the performance of the Mantel-Haenszel (MH), logistic regression (LR), and Wald tests based on item-wise information, cross-product information, observed information, and sandwich-type covariance matrices (denoted by W(d), W(XPD), W(Obs), and W(Sw), respectively) for DIF detection. The results showed that (1) the W(XPD) and LR methods had the best performance in controlling Type I error rates among the six methods investigated in this study and (2) under the uniform DIF condition, when the item quality was high or medium, the power of W(XPD), W(Obs), and W(Sw) was comparable with or superior to that of MH and LR, but when the item quality was low, W(XPD), W(Obs), and W(Sw) were less powerful than MH and LR. Under the non-uniform DIF condition, the power of W(XPD), W(Obs), and W(Sw) was comparable with or higher than that of LR. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6534098/ /pubmed/31164855 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01137 Text en Copyright © 2019 Liu, Yin, Xin, Shao and Yuan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Liu, Yanlou
Yin, Hao
Xin, Tao
Shao, Laicheng
Yuan, Lu
A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Models
title A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Models
title_full A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Models
title_fullStr A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Models
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Models
title_short A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Models
title_sort comparison of differential item functioning detection methods in cognitive diagnostic models
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6534098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31164855
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01137
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyanlou acomparisonofdifferentialitemfunctioningdetectionmethodsincognitivediagnosticmodels
AT yinhao acomparisonofdifferentialitemfunctioningdetectionmethodsincognitivediagnosticmodels
AT xintao acomparisonofdifferentialitemfunctioningdetectionmethodsincognitivediagnosticmodels
AT shaolaicheng acomparisonofdifferentialitemfunctioningdetectionmethodsincognitivediagnosticmodels
AT yuanlu acomparisonofdifferentialitemfunctioningdetectionmethodsincognitivediagnosticmodels
AT liuyanlou comparisonofdifferentialitemfunctioningdetectionmethodsincognitivediagnosticmodels
AT yinhao comparisonofdifferentialitemfunctioningdetectionmethodsincognitivediagnosticmodels
AT xintao comparisonofdifferentialitemfunctioningdetectionmethodsincognitivediagnosticmodels
AT shaolaicheng comparisonofdifferentialitemfunctioningdetectionmethodsincognitivediagnosticmodels
AT yuanlu comparisonofdifferentialitemfunctioningdetectionmethodsincognitivediagnosticmodels