Cargando…

Getting to grips with the process of decision-making in long-term care. Descriptive cases illustrate the chaotic reality of the construction of preferences

BACKGROUND: Clients facing decision-making for long-term care are in need of support and accessible information. Construction of preferences, including context and calculations, for clients in long-term care is challenging because of the variability in supply and demand. This study considers clients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Leersum, Catharina M., Moser, Albine, van Steenkiste, Ben, Wolf, Judith R. L. M., van der Weijden, Trudy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6534314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31125374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217338
_version_ 1783421388836569088
author van Leersum, Catharina M.
Moser, Albine
van Steenkiste, Ben
Wolf, Judith R. L. M.
van der Weijden, Trudy
author_facet van Leersum, Catharina M.
Moser, Albine
van Steenkiste, Ben
Wolf, Judith R. L. M.
van der Weijden, Trudy
author_sort van Leersum, Catharina M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clients facing decision-making for long-term care are in need of support and accessible information. Construction of preferences, including context and calculations, for clients in long-term care is challenging because of the variability in supply and demand. This study considers clients in four different sectors of long-term care: the nursing and care of the elderly, mental health care, care of people with disabilities, and social care. The aim is to understand the construction of preferences in real-life situations. METHOD: Client choices were investigated by qualitative descriptive research. Data were collected from 16 in-depth interviews and 79 client records. Interviews were conducted with clients and relatives or informal caregivers from different care sectors. The original client records were explored, containing texts, letters, and comments of clients and caregivers. All data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four cases showed how preferences were constructed during the decision-making process. Clients discussed a wide range of challenging aspects that have an impact on the construction of preferences, e.g. previous experiences, current treatment or family situation. This study describes two main characteristics of the construction of preferences: context and calculation. CONCLUSION: Clients face diverse challenges during the decision-making process on long-term care and their construction of preferences is variable. A well-designed tool to support the elicitation of preferences seems beneficial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6534314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65343142019-06-05 Getting to grips with the process of decision-making in long-term care. Descriptive cases illustrate the chaotic reality of the construction of preferences van Leersum, Catharina M. Moser, Albine van Steenkiste, Ben Wolf, Judith R. L. M. van der Weijden, Trudy PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Clients facing decision-making for long-term care are in need of support and accessible information. Construction of preferences, including context and calculations, for clients in long-term care is challenging because of the variability in supply and demand. This study considers clients in four different sectors of long-term care: the nursing and care of the elderly, mental health care, care of people with disabilities, and social care. The aim is to understand the construction of preferences in real-life situations. METHOD: Client choices were investigated by qualitative descriptive research. Data were collected from 16 in-depth interviews and 79 client records. Interviews were conducted with clients and relatives or informal caregivers from different care sectors. The original client records were explored, containing texts, letters, and comments of clients and caregivers. All data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four cases showed how preferences were constructed during the decision-making process. Clients discussed a wide range of challenging aspects that have an impact on the construction of preferences, e.g. previous experiences, current treatment or family situation. This study describes two main characteristics of the construction of preferences: context and calculation. CONCLUSION: Clients face diverse challenges during the decision-making process on long-term care and their construction of preferences is variable. A well-designed tool to support the elicitation of preferences seems beneficial. Public Library of Science 2019-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6534314/ /pubmed/31125374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217338 Text en © 2019 van Leersum et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Leersum, Catharina M.
Moser, Albine
van Steenkiste, Ben
Wolf, Judith R. L. M.
van der Weijden, Trudy
Getting to grips with the process of decision-making in long-term care. Descriptive cases illustrate the chaotic reality of the construction of preferences
title Getting to grips with the process of decision-making in long-term care. Descriptive cases illustrate the chaotic reality of the construction of preferences
title_full Getting to grips with the process of decision-making in long-term care. Descriptive cases illustrate the chaotic reality of the construction of preferences
title_fullStr Getting to grips with the process of decision-making in long-term care. Descriptive cases illustrate the chaotic reality of the construction of preferences
title_full_unstemmed Getting to grips with the process of decision-making in long-term care. Descriptive cases illustrate the chaotic reality of the construction of preferences
title_short Getting to grips with the process of decision-making in long-term care. Descriptive cases illustrate the chaotic reality of the construction of preferences
title_sort getting to grips with the process of decision-making in long-term care. descriptive cases illustrate the chaotic reality of the construction of preferences
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6534314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31125374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217338
work_keys_str_mv AT vanleersumcatharinam gettingtogripswiththeprocessofdecisionmakinginlongtermcaredescriptivecasesillustratethechaoticrealityoftheconstructionofpreferences
AT moseralbine gettingtogripswiththeprocessofdecisionmakinginlongtermcaredescriptivecasesillustratethechaoticrealityoftheconstructionofpreferences
AT vansteenkisteben gettingtogripswiththeprocessofdecisionmakinginlongtermcaredescriptivecasesillustratethechaoticrealityoftheconstructionofpreferences
AT wolfjudithrlm gettingtogripswiththeprocessofdecisionmakinginlongtermcaredescriptivecasesillustratethechaoticrealityoftheconstructionofpreferences
AT vanderweijdentrudy gettingtogripswiththeprocessofdecisionmakinginlongtermcaredescriptivecasesillustratethechaoticrealityoftheconstructionofpreferences