Cargando…
Getting to grips with the process of decision-making in long-term care. Descriptive cases illustrate the chaotic reality of the construction of preferences
BACKGROUND: Clients facing decision-making for long-term care are in need of support and accessible information. Construction of preferences, including context and calculations, for clients in long-term care is challenging because of the variability in supply and demand. This study considers clients...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6534314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31125374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217338 |
_version_ | 1783421388836569088 |
---|---|
author | van Leersum, Catharina M. Moser, Albine van Steenkiste, Ben Wolf, Judith R. L. M. van der Weijden, Trudy |
author_facet | van Leersum, Catharina M. Moser, Albine van Steenkiste, Ben Wolf, Judith R. L. M. van der Weijden, Trudy |
author_sort | van Leersum, Catharina M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clients facing decision-making for long-term care are in need of support and accessible information. Construction of preferences, including context and calculations, for clients in long-term care is challenging because of the variability in supply and demand. This study considers clients in four different sectors of long-term care: the nursing and care of the elderly, mental health care, care of people with disabilities, and social care. The aim is to understand the construction of preferences in real-life situations. METHOD: Client choices were investigated by qualitative descriptive research. Data were collected from 16 in-depth interviews and 79 client records. Interviews were conducted with clients and relatives or informal caregivers from different care sectors. The original client records were explored, containing texts, letters, and comments of clients and caregivers. All data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four cases showed how preferences were constructed during the decision-making process. Clients discussed a wide range of challenging aspects that have an impact on the construction of preferences, e.g. previous experiences, current treatment or family situation. This study describes two main characteristics of the construction of preferences: context and calculation. CONCLUSION: Clients face diverse challenges during the decision-making process on long-term care and their construction of preferences is variable. A well-designed tool to support the elicitation of preferences seems beneficial. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6534314 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65343142019-06-05 Getting to grips with the process of decision-making in long-term care. Descriptive cases illustrate the chaotic reality of the construction of preferences van Leersum, Catharina M. Moser, Albine van Steenkiste, Ben Wolf, Judith R. L. M. van der Weijden, Trudy PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Clients facing decision-making for long-term care are in need of support and accessible information. Construction of preferences, including context and calculations, for clients in long-term care is challenging because of the variability in supply and demand. This study considers clients in four different sectors of long-term care: the nursing and care of the elderly, mental health care, care of people with disabilities, and social care. The aim is to understand the construction of preferences in real-life situations. METHOD: Client choices were investigated by qualitative descriptive research. Data were collected from 16 in-depth interviews and 79 client records. Interviews were conducted with clients and relatives or informal caregivers from different care sectors. The original client records were explored, containing texts, letters, and comments of clients and caregivers. All data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four cases showed how preferences were constructed during the decision-making process. Clients discussed a wide range of challenging aspects that have an impact on the construction of preferences, e.g. previous experiences, current treatment or family situation. This study describes two main characteristics of the construction of preferences: context and calculation. CONCLUSION: Clients face diverse challenges during the decision-making process on long-term care and their construction of preferences is variable. A well-designed tool to support the elicitation of preferences seems beneficial. Public Library of Science 2019-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6534314/ /pubmed/31125374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217338 Text en © 2019 van Leersum et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van Leersum, Catharina M. Moser, Albine van Steenkiste, Ben Wolf, Judith R. L. M. van der Weijden, Trudy Getting to grips with the process of decision-making in long-term care. Descriptive cases illustrate the chaotic reality of the construction of preferences |
title | Getting to grips with the process of decision-making in long-term care. Descriptive cases illustrate the chaotic reality of the construction of preferences |
title_full | Getting to grips with the process of decision-making in long-term care. Descriptive cases illustrate the chaotic reality of the construction of preferences |
title_fullStr | Getting to grips with the process of decision-making in long-term care. Descriptive cases illustrate the chaotic reality of the construction of preferences |
title_full_unstemmed | Getting to grips with the process of decision-making in long-term care. Descriptive cases illustrate the chaotic reality of the construction of preferences |
title_short | Getting to grips with the process of decision-making in long-term care. Descriptive cases illustrate the chaotic reality of the construction of preferences |
title_sort | getting to grips with the process of decision-making in long-term care. descriptive cases illustrate the chaotic reality of the construction of preferences |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6534314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31125374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217338 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanleersumcatharinam gettingtogripswiththeprocessofdecisionmakinginlongtermcaredescriptivecasesillustratethechaoticrealityoftheconstructionofpreferences AT moseralbine gettingtogripswiththeprocessofdecisionmakinginlongtermcaredescriptivecasesillustratethechaoticrealityoftheconstructionofpreferences AT vansteenkisteben gettingtogripswiththeprocessofdecisionmakinginlongtermcaredescriptivecasesillustratethechaoticrealityoftheconstructionofpreferences AT wolfjudithrlm gettingtogripswiththeprocessofdecisionmakinginlongtermcaredescriptivecasesillustratethechaoticrealityoftheconstructionofpreferences AT vanderweijdentrudy gettingtogripswiththeprocessofdecisionmakinginlongtermcaredescriptivecasesillustratethechaoticrealityoftheconstructionofpreferences |