Cargando…

Does electrical stimulation in the lower urinary tract increase urine production? A randomised comparative proof-of-concept study in healthy volunteers

TRIAL DESIGN: During electrical stimulation in the lower urinary tract for the purpose of current perception threshold and sensory evoked potential recording, we observed that bladder volume increased rapidly. The aim of this prospective randomised comparative proof-of-concept study was to quantify...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Lely, Stéphanie, Liechti, Martina D., Popp, Werner L., Schmidhalter, Melanie R., Kessler, Thomas M., Mehnert, Ulrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6534346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31125385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217503
_version_ 1783421398728835072
author van der Lely, Stéphanie
Liechti, Martina D.
Popp, Werner L.
Schmidhalter, Melanie R.
Kessler, Thomas M.
Mehnert, Ulrich
author_facet van der Lely, Stéphanie
Liechti, Martina D.
Popp, Werner L.
Schmidhalter, Melanie R.
Kessler, Thomas M.
Mehnert, Ulrich
author_sort van der Lely, Stéphanie
collection PubMed
description TRIAL DESIGN: During electrical stimulation in the lower urinary tract for the purpose of current perception threshold and sensory evoked potential recording, we observed that bladder volume increased rapidly. The aim of this prospective randomised comparative proof-of-concept study was to quantify urine production per time during stimulation of the lower urinary tract using different stimulation frequencies. METHODS: Ninety healthy subjects (18 to 36 years old) were included. Forty females and 50 males were randomly assigned to one of the following study groups: dome, trigone or proximal, membranous (males only) or distal urethra. Starting from 60mL prefilling, stimulation was performed at two separate visits with a 14 French custom-made catheter using randomly applied frequencies of 0.5Hz, 1.1Hz, 1.6Hz (each with 500 stimuli). After each stimulation cycle per frequency, urine production was assessed. Main outcome measures represented urine production during stimulation, daily life and their ratio. RESULTS: Lower urinary tract electrical stimulation increased urine production per time compared to bladder diary baseline values. Linear mixed model showed that frequency (p<0.001), stimulation order (p = 0.003), intensity (p = 0.042), and gender (p = 0.047) had a significant influence on urine production. Location, visit and age had no significant influence. CONCLUSIONS: Urine production is increased during electrical stimulation with a bigger impact of higher frequencies. This might be relevant for methodological aspects in the assessment of lower urinary tract afferent function and for patients with impaired renal urine output. Inhibition of renal sympathetic nerve activity by vagal afferents may be the underlying mechanism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6534346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65343462019-06-05 Does electrical stimulation in the lower urinary tract increase urine production? A randomised comparative proof-of-concept study in healthy volunteers van der Lely, Stéphanie Liechti, Martina D. Popp, Werner L. Schmidhalter, Melanie R. Kessler, Thomas M. Mehnert, Ulrich PLoS One Research Article TRIAL DESIGN: During electrical stimulation in the lower urinary tract for the purpose of current perception threshold and sensory evoked potential recording, we observed that bladder volume increased rapidly. The aim of this prospective randomised comparative proof-of-concept study was to quantify urine production per time during stimulation of the lower urinary tract using different stimulation frequencies. METHODS: Ninety healthy subjects (18 to 36 years old) were included. Forty females and 50 males were randomly assigned to one of the following study groups: dome, trigone or proximal, membranous (males only) or distal urethra. Starting from 60mL prefilling, stimulation was performed at two separate visits with a 14 French custom-made catheter using randomly applied frequencies of 0.5Hz, 1.1Hz, 1.6Hz (each with 500 stimuli). After each stimulation cycle per frequency, urine production was assessed. Main outcome measures represented urine production during stimulation, daily life and their ratio. RESULTS: Lower urinary tract electrical stimulation increased urine production per time compared to bladder diary baseline values. Linear mixed model showed that frequency (p<0.001), stimulation order (p = 0.003), intensity (p = 0.042), and gender (p = 0.047) had a significant influence on urine production. Location, visit and age had no significant influence. CONCLUSIONS: Urine production is increased during electrical stimulation with a bigger impact of higher frequencies. This might be relevant for methodological aspects in the assessment of lower urinary tract afferent function and for patients with impaired renal urine output. Inhibition of renal sympathetic nerve activity by vagal afferents may be the underlying mechanism. Public Library of Science 2019-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6534346/ /pubmed/31125385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217503 Text en © 2019 van der Lely et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van der Lely, Stéphanie
Liechti, Martina D.
Popp, Werner L.
Schmidhalter, Melanie R.
Kessler, Thomas M.
Mehnert, Ulrich
Does electrical stimulation in the lower urinary tract increase urine production? A randomised comparative proof-of-concept study in healthy volunteers
title Does electrical stimulation in the lower urinary tract increase urine production? A randomised comparative proof-of-concept study in healthy volunteers
title_full Does electrical stimulation in the lower urinary tract increase urine production? A randomised comparative proof-of-concept study in healthy volunteers
title_fullStr Does electrical stimulation in the lower urinary tract increase urine production? A randomised comparative proof-of-concept study in healthy volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Does electrical stimulation in the lower urinary tract increase urine production? A randomised comparative proof-of-concept study in healthy volunteers
title_short Does electrical stimulation in the lower urinary tract increase urine production? A randomised comparative proof-of-concept study in healthy volunteers
title_sort does electrical stimulation in the lower urinary tract increase urine production? a randomised comparative proof-of-concept study in healthy volunteers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6534346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31125385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217503
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderlelystephanie doeselectricalstimulationinthelowerurinarytractincreaseurineproductionarandomisedcomparativeproofofconceptstudyinhealthyvolunteers
AT liechtimartinad doeselectricalstimulationinthelowerurinarytractincreaseurineproductionarandomisedcomparativeproofofconceptstudyinhealthyvolunteers
AT poppwernerl doeselectricalstimulationinthelowerurinarytractincreaseurineproductionarandomisedcomparativeproofofconceptstudyinhealthyvolunteers
AT schmidhaltermelanier doeselectricalstimulationinthelowerurinarytractincreaseurineproductionarandomisedcomparativeproofofconceptstudyinhealthyvolunteers
AT kesslerthomasm doeselectricalstimulationinthelowerurinarytractincreaseurineproductionarandomisedcomparativeproofofconceptstudyinhealthyvolunteers
AT mehnertulrich doeselectricalstimulationinthelowerurinarytractincreaseurineproductionarandomisedcomparativeproofofconceptstudyinhealthyvolunteers