Cargando…
Honey bee predisposition of resistance to ubiquitous mite infestations
Host-parasite co-evolution history is lacking when parasites switch to novel hosts. This was the case for Western honey bees (Apis mellifera) when the ectoparasitic mite, Varroa destructor, switched hosts from Eastern honey bees (Apis cerana). This mite has since become the most severe biological th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6534585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31127129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44254-8 |
_version_ | 1783421441307312128 |
---|---|
author | Broeckx, Bart J. G. De Smet, Lina Blacquière, Tjeerd Maebe, Kevin Khalenkow, Mikalaï Van Poucke, Mario Dahle, Bjorn Neumann, Peter Bach Nguyen, Kim Smagghe, Guy Deforce, Dieter Van Nieuwerburgh, Filip Peelman, Luc de Graaf, Dirk C. |
author_facet | Broeckx, Bart J. G. De Smet, Lina Blacquière, Tjeerd Maebe, Kevin Khalenkow, Mikalaï Van Poucke, Mario Dahle, Bjorn Neumann, Peter Bach Nguyen, Kim Smagghe, Guy Deforce, Dieter Van Nieuwerburgh, Filip Peelman, Luc de Graaf, Dirk C. |
author_sort | Broeckx, Bart J. G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Host-parasite co-evolution history is lacking when parasites switch to novel hosts. This was the case for Western honey bees (Apis mellifera) when the ectoparasitic mite, Varroa destructor, switched hosts from Eastern honey bees (Apis cerana). This mite has since become the most severe biological threat to A. mellifera worldwide. However, some A. mellifera populations are known to survive infestations, largely by suppressing mite population growth. One known mechanism is suppressed mite reproduction (SMR), but the underlying genetics are poorly understood. Here, we take advantage of haploid drones, originating from one queen from the Netherlands that developed Varroa-resistance, whole exome sequencing and elastic-net regression to identify genetic variants associated with SMR in resistant honeybees. An eight variants model predicted 88% of the phenotypes correctly and identified six risk and two protective variants. Reproducing and non-reproducing mites could not be distinguished using DNA microsatellites, which is in agreement with the hypothesis that it is not the parasite but the host that adapted itself. Our results suggest that the brood pheromone-dependent mite oogenesis is disrupted in resistant hosts. The identified genetic markers have a considerable potential to contribute to a sustainable global apiculture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6534585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65345852019-06-03 Honey bee predisposition of resistance to ubiquitous mite infestations Broeckx, Bart J. G. De Smet, Lina Blacquière, Tjeerd Maebe, Kevin Khalenkow, Mikalaï Van Poucke, Mario Dahle, Bjorn Neumann, Peter Bach Nguyen, Kim Smagghe, Guy Deforce, Dieter Van Nieuwerburgh, Filip Peelman, Luc de Graaf, Dirk C. Sci Rep Article Host-parasite co-evolution history is lacking when parasites switch to novel hosts. This was the case for Western honey bees (Apis mellifera) when the ectoparasitic mite, Varroa destructor, switched hosts from Eastern honey bees (Apis cerana). This mite has since become the most severe biological threat to A. mellifera worldwide. However, some A. mellifera populations are known to survive infestations, largely by suppressing mite population growth. One known mechanism is suppressed mite reproduction (SMR), but the underlying genetics are poorly understood. Here, we take advantage of haploid drones, originating from one queen from the Netherlands that developed Varroa-resistance, whole exome sequencing and elastic-net regression to identify genetic variants associated with SMR in resistant honeybees. An eight variants model predicted 88% of the phenotypes correctly and identified six risk and two protective variants. Reproducing and non-reproducing mites could not be distinguished using DNA microsatellites, which is in agreement with the hypothesis that it is not the parasite but the host that adapted itself. Our results suggest that the brood pheromone-dependent mite oogenesis is disrupted in resistant hosts. The identified genetic markers have a considerable potential to contribute to a sustainable global apiculture. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6534585/ /pubmed/31127129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44254-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Broeckx, Bart J. G. De Smet, Lina Blacquière, Tjeerd Maebe, Kevin Khalenkow, Mikalaï Van Poucke, Mario Dahle, Bjorn Neumann, Peter Bach Nguyen, Kim Smagghe, Guy Deforce, Dieter Van Nieuwerburgh, Filip Peelman, Luc de Graaf, Dirk C. Honey bee predisposition of resistance to ubiquitous mite infestations |
title | Honey bee predisposition of resistance to ubiquitous mite infestations |
title_full | Honey bee predisposition of resistance to ubiquitous mite infestations |
title_fullStr | Honey bee predisposition of resistance to ubiquitous mite infestations |
title_full_unstemmed | Honey bee predisposition of resistance to ubiquitous mite infestations |
title_short | Honey bee predisposition of resistance to ubiquitous mite infestations |
title_sort | honey bee predisposition of resistance to ubiquitous mite infestations |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6534585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31127129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44254-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT broeckxbartjg honeybeepredispositionofresistancetoubiquitousmiteinfestations AT desmetlina honeybeepredispositionofresistancetoubiquitousmiteinfestations AT blacquieretjeerd honeybeepredispositionofresistancetoubiquitousmiteinfestations AT maebekevin honeybeepredispositionofresistancetoubiquitousmiteinfestations AT khalenkowmikalai honeybeepredispositionofresistancetoubiquitousmiteinfestations AT vanpouckemario honeybeepredispositionofresistancetoubiquitousmiteinfestations AT dahlebjorn honeybeepredispositionofresistancetoubiquitousmiteinfestations AT neumannpeter honeybeepredispositionofresistancetoubiquitousmiteinfestations AT bachnguyenkim honeybeepredispositionofresistancetoubiquitousmiteinfestations AT smaggheguy honeybeepredispositionofresistancetoubiquitousmiteinfestations AT deforcedieter honeybeepredispositionofresistancetoubiquitousmiteinfestations AT vannieuwerburghfilip honeybeepredispositionofresistancetoubiquitousmiteinfestations AT peelmanluc honeybeepredispositionofresistancetoubiquitousmiteinfestations AT degraafdirkc honeybeepredispositionofresistancetoubiquitousmiteinfestations |