Cargando…
A systematic review and meta-analysis of adherence to physical activity interventions among three chronic conditions: cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes
BACKGROUND: Physical activity is effective for the prevention and treatment of chronic disease, yet insufficient evidence is available to make comparisons regarding adherence to aerobic physical activity interventions among chronic disease populations, or across different settings. The purpose of th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6534868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31126260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6877-z |
_version_ | 1783421496896520192 |
---|---|
author | Bullard, Tiffany Ji, Mengmeng An, Ruopeng Trinh, Linda Mackenzie, Michael Mullen, Sean P. |
author_facet | Bullard, Tiffany Ji, Mengmeng An, Ruopeng Trinh, Linda Mackenzie, Michael Mullen, Sean P. |
author_sort | Bullard, Tiffany |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Physical activity is effective for the prevention and treatment of chronic disease, yet insufficient evidence is available to make comparisons regarding adherence to aerobic physical activity interventions among chronic disease populations, or across different settings. The purpose of this review is to investigate and provide a quantitative summary of adherence rates to the aerobic physical activity guidelines among people with chronic conditions, as physical activity is an effective form of treatment and prevention of chronic disease. METHODS: Randomized controlled (RCTs) trials where aerobic physical activity was the primary intervention were selected from PsychInfo, PubMed, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Clinical Key, and SCOPUS from 2000 to 2018. Studies were included if the program prescription aligned with the 2008 aerobic physical activity guidelines, were at least 12 weeks in length, and included adult participants living with one of three chronic diseases. The data was extracted by hand and the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis) guidelines were used to evaluate risk-of-bias and quality of evidence. Data were pooled using random-effect models. The primary outcome measure was program adherence and the secondary outcome measures were dropout and setting (e.g. home vs. clinic-based). Pooled effect sizes and 95% CiIs (confidence intervals) were calculated using random-effect models. RESULTS: The literature search identified 1616 potentially eligible studies, of which 30 studies (published between 2000 and 2018, including 3,721 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Three clinical populations were targeted: cancer (n = 14), cardiovascular disease (n = 7), and diabetes (n = 9). Although not statistically significant, adherence rates varied across samples (65, 90, and 80%, respectively) whereas dropout rates were relatively low and consistent across samples (5, 4, and 3%). The average adherence rate, regardless of condition, is 77% (95% CI = 0.68, 0.84) of their prescribed physical activity treatment. The pooled adherence rates for clinic-based and home-based programs did not differ (74% [95% CI, 0.65, 0.82] and 80% [95% CI, 0.65, 0.91], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence suggests that people with chronic conditions are capable of sustaining aerobic physical activity for 3+ months, as a form of treatment. Moreover, home-based programs may be just as feasible as supervised, clinic-based physical activity programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6534868 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65348682019-05-30 A systematic review and meta-analysis of adherence to physical activity interventions among three chronic conditions: cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes Bullard, Tiffany Ji, Mengmeng An, Ruopeng Trinh, Linda Mackenzie, Michael Mullen, Sean P. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Physical activity is effective for the prevention and treatment of chronic disease, yet insufficient evidence is available to make comparisons regarding adherence to aerobic physical activity interventions among chronic disease populations, or across different settings. The purpose of this review is to investigate and provide a quantitative summary of adherence rates to the aerobic physical activity guidelines among people with chronic conditions, as physical activity is an effective form of treatment and prevention of chronic disease. METHODS: Randomized controlled (RCTs) trials where aerobic physical activity was the primary intervention were selected from PsychInfo, PubMed, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Clinical Key, and SCOPUS from 2000 to 2018. Studies were included if the program prescription aligned with the 2008 aerobic physical activity guidelines, were at least 12 weeks in length, and included adult participants living with one of three chronic diseases. The data was extracted by hand and the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis) guidelines were used to evaluate risk-of-bias and quality of evidence. Data were pooled using random-effect models. The primary outcome measure was program adherence and the secondary outcome measures were dropout and setting (e.g. home vs. clinic-based). Pooled effect sizes and 95% CiIs (confidence intervals) were calculated using random-effect models. RESULTS: The literature search identified 1616 potentially eligible studies, of which 30 studies (published between 2000 and 2018, including 3,721 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Three clinical populations were targeted: cancer (n = 14), cardiovascular disease (n = 7), and diabetes (n = 9). Although not statistically significant, adherence rates varied across samples (65, 90, and 80%, respectively) whereas dropout rates were relatively low and consistent across samples (5, 4, and 3%). The average adherence rate, regardless of condition, is 77% (95% CI = 0.68, 0.84) of their prescribed physical activity treatment. The pooled adherence rates for clinic-based and home-based programs did not differ (74% [95% CI, 0.65, 0.82] and 80% [95% CI, 0.65, 0.91], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence suggests that people with chronic conditions are capable of sustaining aerobic physical activity for 3+ months, as a form of treatment. Moreover, home-based programs may be just as feasible as supervised, clinic-based physical activity programs. BioMed Central 2019-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6534868/ /pubmed/31126260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6877-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bullard, Tiffany Ji, Mengmeng An, Ruopeng Trinh, Linda Mackenzie, Michael Mullen, Sean P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of adherence to physical activity interventions among three chronic conditions: cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes |
title | A systematic review and meta-analysis of adherence to physical activity interventions among three chronic conditions: cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes |
title_full | A systematic review and meta-analysis of adherence to physical activity interventions among three chronic conditions: cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes |
title_fullStr | A systematic review and meta-analysis of adherence to physical activity interventions among three chronic conditions: cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review and meta-analysis of adherence to physical activity interventions among three chronic conditions: cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes |
title_short | A systematic review and meta-analysis of adherence to physical activity interventions among three chronic conditions: cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis of adherence to physical activity interventions among three chronic conditions: cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6534868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31126260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6877-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bullardtiffany asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofadherencetophysicalactivityinterventionsamongthreechronicconditionscancercardiovasculardiseaseanddiabetes AT jimengmeng asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofadherencetophysicalactivityinterventionsamongthreechronicconditionscancercardiovasculardiseaseanddiabetes AT anruopeng asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofadherencetophysicalactivityinterventionsamongthreechronicconditionscancercardiovasculardiseaseanddiabetes AT trinhlinda asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofadherencetophysicalactivityinterventionsamongthreechronicconditionscancercardiovasculardiseaseanddiabetes AT mackenziemichael asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofadherencetophysicalactivityinterventionsamongthreechronicconditionscancercardiovasculardiseaseanddiabetes AT mullenseanp asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofadherencetophysicalactivityinterventionsamongthreechronicconditionscancercardiovasculardiseaseanddiabetes AT bullardtiffany systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofadherencetophysicalactivityinterventionsamongthreechronicconditionscancercardiovasculardiseaseanddiabetes AT jimengmeng systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofadherencetophysicalactivityinterventionsamongthreechronicconditionscancercardiovasculardiseaseanddiabetes AT anruopeng systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofadherencetophysicalactivityinterventionsamongthreechronicconditionscancercardiovasculardiseaseanddiabetes AT trinhlinda systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofadherencetophysicalactivityinterventionsamongthreechronicconditionscancercardiovasculardiseaseanddiabetes AT mackenziemichael systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofadherencetophysicalactivityinterventionsamongthreechronicconditionscancercardiovasculardiseaseanddiabetes AT mullenseanp systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofadherencetophysicalactivityinterventionsamongthreechronicconditionscancercardiovasculardiseaseanddiabetes |