Cargando…

Protective effect of lutein on spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats

OBJECTIVE(S): Paraplegia is deterioration in motor or sensory function of the lower limbs that can occur after modification of a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. The purpose of this survey was to determine the protective action of lutein on spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) damage. MATERIALS A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammad Pour, Masoumeh, Farjah, Gholam Hossein, Karimipour, Mojtaba, Pourheidar, Bagher, Khadem Ansari, Mohammad Hassan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31168346
http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/ijbms.2018.30039.7239
_version_ 1783421556200833024
author Mohammad Pour, Masoumeh
Farjah, Gholam Hossein
Karimipour, Mojtaba
Pourheidar, Bagher
Khadem Ansari, Mohammad Hassan
author_facet Mohammad Pour, Masoumeh
Farjah, Gholam Hossein
Karimipour, Mojtaba
Pourheidar, Bagher
Khadem Ansari, Mohammad Hassan
author_sort Mohammad Pour, Masoumeh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE(S): Paraplegia is deterioration in motor or sensory function of the lower limbs that can occur after modification of a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. The purpose of this survey was to determine the protective action of lutein on spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) damage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five male rats were distributed into five groups: intact, sham, dimethyl sulfoxide (I-R+DMSO), low dose lutein (I-R+0.2 mg/kg lutein), and high dose lutein (I-R + 0.4 mg/kg lutein). Thirty minutes before surgery, a single dose lutein or DMSO was administered to rats of experimental groups. Next, the abdominal aorta was clamped exactly under the left renal artery and proximal to the abdominal aortic bifurcation for 60 min. All animals were evaluated by neurological function and histological and biochemical examinations at 72 hr after I-R. RESULTS: The mean motor deficit index (MDI) scores in lutein groups were lower compared with the DMSO group (P<0.001). Plasma level of malondialdehyde in lutein groups decreased compared with the DMSO group (P<0.05). Plasma level of total antioxidative capacity was increased in the high lutein group compared with low dose lutein and sham groups (P<0.05). Mean number of normal motor neurons in lutein groups was greater compared with the DMSO group (P<0.001). There was a significant negative correlation between MDI scores and the number of normal neurons (r= -0.764, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Findings of the present study demonstrate that lutein may support spinal cord neurons from I-R damage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6535199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65351992019-06-05 Protective effect of lutein on spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats Mohammad Pour, Masoumeh Farjah, Gholam Hossein Karimipour, Mojtaba Pourheidar, Bagher Khadem Ansari, Mohammad Hassan Iran J Basic Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE(S): Paraplegia is deterioration in motor or sensory function of the lower limbs that can occur after modification of a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. The purpose of this survey was to determine the protective action of lutein on spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) damage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five male rats were distributed into five groups: intact, sham, dimethyl sulfoxide (I-R+DMSO), low dose lutein (I-R+0.2 mg/kg lutein), and high dose lutein (I-R + 0.4 mg/kg lutein). Thirty minutes before surgery, a single dose lutein or DMSO was administered to rats of experimental groups. Next, the abdominal aorta was clamped exactly under the left renal artery and proximal to the abdominal aortic bifurcation for 60 min. All animals were evaluated by neurological function and histological and biochemical examinations at 72 hr after I-R. RESULTS: The mean motor deficit index (MDI) scores in lutein groups were lower compared with the DMSO group (P<0.001). Plasma level of malondialdehyde in lutein groups decreased compared with the DMSO group (P<0.05). Plasma level of total antioxidative capacity was increased in the high lutein group compared with low dose lutein and sham groups (P<0.05). Mean number of normal motor neurons in lutein groups was greater compared with the DMSO group (P<0.001). There was a significant negative correlation between MDI scores and the number of normal neurons (r= -0.764, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Findings of the present study demonstrate that lutein may support spinal cord neurons from I-R damage. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6535199/ /pubmed/31168346 http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/ijbms.2018.30039.7239 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mohammad Pour, Masoumeh
Farjah, Gholam Hossein
Karimipour, Mojtaba
Pourheidar, Bagher
Khadem Ansari, Mohammad Hassan
Protective effect of lutein on spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats
title Protective effect of lutein on spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats
title_full Protective effect of lutein on spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats
title_fullStr Protective effect of lutein on spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats
title_full_unstemmed Protective effect of lutein on spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats
title_short Protective effect of lutein on spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats
title_sort protective effect of lutein on spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31168346
http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/ijbms.2018.30039.7239
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadpourmasoumeh protectiveeffectofluteinonspinalcordischemiareperfusioninjuryinrats
AT farjahgholamhossein protectiveeffectofluteinonspinalcordischemiareperfusioninjuryinrats
AT karimipourmojtaba protectiveeffectofluteinonspinalcordischemiareperfusioninjuryinrats
AT pourheidarbagher protectiveeffectofluteinonspinalcordischemiareperfusioninjuryinrats
AT khademansarimohammadhassan protectiveeffectofluteinonspinalcordischemiareperfusioninjuryinrats