Cargando…

A mathematical landmark-based method for measuring worn molars in hominoid systematics

Worn teeth pose a major limitation to researchers in the fields of extinct and extant hominoid systematics because they lack clearly identifiable anatomical landmarks needed to take measurements on the crown enamel surface and are typically discarded from a study. This is particularly detrimental wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dykes, Susan J., Pilbrow, Varsha C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31198638
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6990
_version_ 1783421559488118784
author Dykes, Susan J.
Pilbrow, Varsha C.
author_facet Dykes, Susan J.
Pilbrow, Varsha C.
author_sort Dykes, Susan J.
collection PubMed
description Worn teeth pose a major limitation to researchers in the fields of extinct and extant hominoid systematics because they lack clearly identifiable anatomical landmarks needed to take measurements on the crown enamel surface and are typically discarded from a study. This is particularly detrimental when sample sizes for some groups are already characteristically low, if there is an imbalance between samples representing populations, sexes or dietary strategies, or if the worn teeth in question are type specimens of fossil species or other key specimens. This study proposes a methodology based predominantly on mathematically-derived landmarks for measuring size and shape features of molars, irrespective of wear. With 110 specimens of lower second molars from five species of extant hominoids (Pan troglodytes, P. paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, G. beringei, Homo sapiens), n ≥ 20 per species, n ≥ 10 per subspecies, good species separation in morphospace is achieved in a principal components analysis. Classification accuracy in a discriminant function analysis is 96.4% at the species level and 88.2% at the subspecies level (92.7% and 79.1%, respectively, on cross-validation). The classification accuracy compares favorably to that achieved by anatomically-derived measurements based on published research (94% and 84% at the species and subspecies level respectively; 91% and 76% on cross-validation). The mathematical landmarking methodology is rapid and uncomplicated. The results support the use of mathematical landmarks to enable the inclusion of worn molar teeth in dental studies so as to maximize sample sizes and restore balance between populations and/or sexes in hominoid systematic studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6535218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65352182019-06-13 A mathematical landmark-based method for measuring worn molars in hominoid systematics Dykes, Susan J. Pilbrow, Varsha C. PeerJ Anthropology Worn teeth pose a major limitation to researchers in the fields of extinct and extant hominoid systematics because they lack clearly identifiable anatomical landmarks needed to take measurements on the crown enamel surface and are typically discarded from a study. This is particularly detrimental when sample sizes for some groups are already characteristically low, if there is an imbalance between samples representing populations, sexes or dietary strategies, or if the worn teeth in question are type specimens of fossil species or other key specimens. This study proposes a methodology based predominantly on mathematically-derived landmarks for measuring size and shape features of molars, irrespective of wear. With 110 specimens of lower second molars from five species of extant hominoids (Pan troglodytes, P. paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, G. beringei, Homo sapiens), n ≥ 20 per species, n ≥ 10 per subspecies, good species separation in morphospace is achieved in a principal components analysis. Classification accuracy in a discriminant function analysis is 96.4% at the species level and 88.2% at the subspecies level (92.7% and 79.1%, respectively, on cross-validation). The classification accuracy compares favorably to that achieved by anatomically-derived measurements based on published research (94% and 84% at the species and subspecies level respectively; 91% and 76% on cross-validation). The mathematical landmarking methodology is rapid and uncomplicated. The results support the use of mathematical landmarks to enable the inclusion of worn molar teeth in dental studies so as to maximize sample sizes and restore balance between populations and/or sexes in hominoid systematic studies. PeerJ Inc. 2019-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6535218/ /pubmed/31198638 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6990 Text en ©2019 Dykes and Pilbrow http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Anthropology
Dykes, Susan J.
Pilbrow, Varsha C.
A mathematical landmark-based method for measuring worn molars in hominoid systematics
title A mathematical landmark-based method for measuring worn molars in hominoid systematics
title_full A mathematical landmark-based method for measuring worn molars in hominoid systematics
title_fullStr A mathematical landmark-based method for measuring worn molars in hominoid systematics
title_full_unstemmed A mathematical landmark-based method for measuring worn molars in hominoid systematics
title_short A mathematical landmark-based method for measuring worn molars in hominoid systematics
title_sort mathematical landmark-based method for measuring worn molars in hominoid systematics
topic Anthropology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31198638
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6990
work_keys_str_mv AT dykessusanj amathematicallandmarkbasedmethodformeasuringwornmolarsinhominoidsystematics
AT pilbrowvarshac amathematicallandmarkbasedmethodformeasuringwornmolarsinhominoidsystematics
AT dykessusanj mathematicallandmarkbasedmethodformeasuringwornmolarsinhominoidsystematics
AT pilbrowvarshac mathematicallandmarkbasedmethodformeasuringwornmolarsinhominoidsystematics