Cargando…

Comparing Patient Risk Factor-, Sequence Type-, and Resistance Locus Identification-Based Approaches for Predicting Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli Bloodstream Infections

Rapid diagnostic tests for antibiotic resistance that identify the presence or absence of antibiotic resistance genes/loci are increasingly being developed. However, these approaches usually neglect other sources of predictive information which could be identified over shorter time periods, includin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MacFadden, Derek R., Melano, Roberto G., Coburn, Bryan, Tijet, Nathalie, Hanage, William P., Daneman, Nick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01780-18
_version_ 1783421586520408064
author MacFadden, Derek R.
Melano, Roberto G.
Coburn, Bryan
Tijet, Nathalie
Hanage, William P.
Daneman, Nick
author_facet MacFadden, Derek R.
Melano, Roberto G.
Coburn, Bryan
Tijet, Nathalie
Hanage, William P.
Daneman, Nick
author_sort MacFadden, Derek R.
collection PubMed
description Rapid diagnostic tests for antibiotic resistance that identify the presence or absence of antibiotic resistance genes/loci are increasingly being developed. However, these approaches usually neglect other sources of predictive information which could be identified over shorter time periods, including patient epidemiologic risk factors for antibiotic resistance and markers of lineage. Using a data set of 414 Escherichia coli isolates recovered from separate episodes of bacteremia at a single academic institution in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, between 2010 and 2015, we compared the potential predictive ability of three approaches (epidemiologic risk factor-, pathogen sequence type [ST]-, and resistance gene identification-based approaches) for classifying phenotypic resistance to three antibiotics representing classes of broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy (ceftriaxone [a 3rd-generation cephalosporin], ciprofloxacin [a fluoroquinolone], and gentamicin [an aminoglycoside]). We used logistic regression models to generate model receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Predictive discrimination was measured using apparent and corrected (bootstrapped) areas under the curves (AUCs). Epidemiologic risk factor-based models based on two simple risk factors (prior antibiotic exposure and recent prior susceptibility of Gram-negative bacteria) provided a modest predictive discrimination, with AUCs ranging from 0.65 to 0.74. Sequence type-based models demonstrated strong discrimination (AUCs, 0.83 to 0.94) across all three antibiotic classes. The addition of epidemiologic risk factors to sequence type significantly improved the ability to predict resistance for all antibiotics (P < 0.05). Resistance gene identification-based approaches provided the highest degree of discrimination (AUCs, 0.88 to 0.99), with no statistically significant benefit being achieved by adding the patient epidemiologic predictors. In summary, sequence type or other lineage-based approaches could produce an excellent discrimination of antibiotic resistance and may be improved by incorporating readily available patient epidemiologic predictors but are less discriminatory than identification of the presence of known resistance loci.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6535602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65356022019-06-14 Comparing Patient Risk Factor-, Sequence Type-, and Resistance Locus Identification-Based Approaches for Predicting Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli Bloodstream Infections MacFadden, Derek R. Melano, Roberto G. Coburn, Bryan Tijet, Nathalie Hanage, William P. Daneman, Nick J Clin Microbiol Epidemiology Rapid diagnostic tests for antibiotic resistance that identify the presence or absence of antibiotic resistance genes/loci are increasingly being developed. However, these approaches usually neglect other sources of predictive information which could be identified over shorter time periods, including patient epidemiologic risk factors for antibiotic resistance and markers of lineage. Using a data set of 414 Escherichia coli isolates recovered from separate episodes of bacteremia at a single academic institution in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, between 2010 and 2015, we compared the potential predictive ability of three approaches (epidemiologic risk factor-, pathogen sequence type [ST]-, and resistance gene identification-based approaches) for classifying phenotypic resistance to three antibiotics representing classes of broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy (ceftriaxone [a 3rd-generation cephalosporin], ciprofloxacin [a fluoroquinolone], and gentamicin [an aminoglycoside]). We used logistic regression models to generate model receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Predictive discrimination was measured using apparent and corrected (bootstrapped) areas under the curves (AUCs). Epidemiologic risk factor-based models based on two simple risk factors (prior antibiotic exposure and recent prior susceptibility of Gram-negative bacteria) provided a modest predictive discrimination, with AUCs ranging from 0.65 to 0.74. Sequence type-based models demonstrated strong discrimination (AUCs, 0.83 to 0.94) across all three antibiotic classes. The addition of epidemiologic risk factors to sequence type significantly improved the ability to predict resistance for all antibiotics (P < 0.05). Resistance gene identification-based approaches provided the highest degree of discrimination (AUCs, 0.88 to 0.99), with no statistically significant benefit being achieved by adding the patient epidemiologic predictors. In summary, sequence type or other lineage-based approaches could produce an excellent discrimination of antibiotic resistance and may be improved by incorporating readily available patient epidemiologic predictors but are less discriminatory than identification of the presence of known resistance loci. American Society for Microbiology 2019-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6535602/ /pubmed/30894438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01780-18 Text en Copyright © 2019 MacFadden et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Epidemiology
MacFadden, Derek R.
Melano, Roberto G.
Coburn, Bryan
Tijet, Nathalie
Hanage, William P.
Daneman, Nick
Comparing Patient Risk Factor-, Sequence Type-, and Resistance Locus Identification-Based Approaches for Predicting Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli Bloodstream Infections
title Comparing Patient Risk Factor-, Sequence Type-, and Resistance Locus Identification-Based Approaches for Predicting Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli Bloodstream Infections
title_full Comparing Patient Risk Factor-, Sequence Type-, and Resistance Locus Identification-Based Approaches for Predicting Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli Bloodstream Infections
title_fullStr Comparing Patient Risk Factor-, Sequence Type-, and Resistance Locus Identification-Based Approaches for Predicting Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli Bloodstream Infections
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Patient Risk Factor-, Sequence Type-, and Resistance Locus Identification-Based Approaches for Predicting Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli Bloodstream Infections
title_short Comparing Patient Risk Factor-, Sequence Type-, and Resistance Locus Identification-Based Approaches for Predicting Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli Bloodstream Infections
title_sort comparing patient risk factor-, sequence type-, and resistance locus identification-based approaches for predicting antibiotic resistance in escherichia coli bloodstream infections
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01780-18
work_keys_str_mv AT macfaddenderekr comparingpatientriskfactorsequencetypeandresistancelocusidentificationbasedapproachesforpredictingantibioticresistanceinescherichiacolibloodstreaminfections
AT melanorobertog comparingpatientriskfactorsequencetypeandresistancelocusidentificationbasedapproachesforpredictingantibioticresistanceinescherichiacolibloodstreaminfections
AT coburnbryan comparingpatientriskfactorsequencetypeandresistancelocusidentificationbasedapproachesforpredictingantibioticresistanceinescherichiacolibloodstreaminfections
AT tijetnathalie comparingpatientriskfactorsequencetypeandresistancelocusidentificationbasedapproachesforpredictingantibioticresistanceinescherichiacolibloodstreaminfections
AT hanagewilliamp comparingpatientriskfactorsequencetypeandresistancelocusidentificationbasedapproachesforpredictingantibioticresistanceinescherichiacolibloodstreaminfections
AT danemannick comparingpatientriskfactorsequencetypeandresistancelocusidentificationbasedapproachesforpredictingantibioticresistanceinescherichiacolibloodstreaminfections