Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND: We performed a randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, multicenter, non-inferiority (NI) study to compare the safety and efficacy of a ready-to-drink formulation of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid (SPMC oral solution) with a powder formulation (P/MC powder) for ora...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hookey, Lawrence, Bertiger, Gerald, Lee Johnson, Kenneth, Ayala, Julia, Seifu, Yodit, Brogadir, Stuart P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31205487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284819851510
_version_ 1783421608807890944
author Hookey, Lawrence
Bertiger, Gerald
Lee Johnson, Kenneth
Ayala, Julia
Seifu, Yodit
Brogadir, Stuart P
author_facet Hookey, Lawrence
Bertiger, Gerald
Lee Johnson, Kenneth
Ayala, Julia
Seifu, Yodit
Brogadir, Stuart P
author_sort Hookey, Lawrence
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We performed a randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, multicenter, non-inferiority (NI) study to compare the safety and efficacy of a ready-to-drink formulation of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid (SPMC oral solution) with a powder formulation (P/MC powder) for oral solution. METHODS: Eligible participants (adults undergoing elective colonoscopy) were randomized 1:1 to split-dose SPMC oral solution or P/MC powder. The primary efficacy endpoint assessed overall colon-cleansing quality with the Aronchick Scale (AS), and the key secondary efficacy endpoint rated quality of right colon cleansing with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Assessments were performed by a treatment-blinded endoscopist. Tolerability was assessed using the Mayo Clinic Bowel Prep Tolerability Questionnaire. Safety assessments included adverse events and laboratory evaluations. RESULTS: The study included 901 participants: 448 for SPMC oral solution; 453 for P/MC powder. SPMC oral solution demonstrated non-inferiority to P/MC powder {87.7% (393/448) responders versus 81.5% (369/453) responders [difference (95% confidence interval): 6.3% (1.8, 10.9)]}. The key secondary efficacy objective assessing the right colon was also met. According to the prespecified hierarchical testing, after meeting the primary and key secondary objectives, SPMC oral solution was tested for superiority to P/MC powder for the primary endpoint (p = 0.0067). SPMC oral solution was well tolerated. Most common adverse events were nausea (3.1% versus 2.9%), headache (2.7% versus 3.1%), hypermagnesemia (2.0% versus 5.1%), and vomiting (1.3% versus 0.7%) for SPMC oral solution and P/MC powder, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ready-to-drink SPMC oral solution showed superior efficacy of overall colon cleansing compared with P/MC powder, with similar safety and tolerability. [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03017235.]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6535705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65357052019-06-14 Efficacy and safety of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial Hookey, Lawrence Bertiger, Gerald Lee Johnson, Kenneth Ayala, Julia Seifu, Yodit Brogadir, Stuart P Therap Adv Gastroenterol Original Research BACKGROUND: We performed a randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, multicenter, non-inferiority (NI) study to compare the safety and efficacy of a ready-to-drink formulation of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid (SPMC oral solution) with a powder formulation (P/MC powder) for oral solution. METHODS: Eligible participants (adults undergoing elective colonoscopy) were randomized 1:1 to split-dose SPMC oral solution or P/MC powder. The primary efficacy endpoint assessed overall colon-cleansing quality with the Aronchick Scale (AS), and the key secondary efficacy endpoint rated quality of right colon cleansing with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Assessments were performed by a treatment-blinded endoscopist. Tolerability was assessed using the Mayo Clinic Bowel Prep Tolerability Questionnaire. Safety assessments included adverse events and laboratory evaluations. RESULTS: The study included 901 participants: 448 for SPMC oral solution; 453 for P/MC powder. SPMC oral solution demonstrated non-inferiority to P/MC powder {87.7% (393/448) responders versus 81.5% (369/453) responders [difference (95% confidence interval): 6.3% (1.8, 10.9)]}. The key secondary efficacy objective assessing the right colon was also met. According to the prespecified hierarchical testing, after meeting the primary and key secondary objectives, SPMC oral solution was tested for superiority to P/MC powder for the primary endpoint (p = 0.0067). SPMC oral solution was well tolerated. Most common adverse events were nausea (3.1% versus 2.9%), headache (2.7% versus 3.1%), hypermagnesemia (2.0% versus 5.1%), and vomiting (1.3% versus 0.7%) for SPMC oral solution and P/MC powder, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ready-to-drink SPMC oral solution showed superior efficacy of overall colon cleansing compared with P/MC powder, with similar safety and tolerability. [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03017235.] SAGE Publications 2019-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6535705/ /pubmed/31205487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284819851510 Text en © The Author(s), 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Hookey, Lawrence
Bertiger, Gerald
Lee Johnson, Kenneth
Ayala, Julia
Seifu, Yodit
Brogadir, Stuart P
Efficacy and safety of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial
title Efficacy and safety of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial
title_full Efficacy and safety of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial
title_short Efficacy and safety of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31205487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284819851510
work_keys_str_mv AT hookeylawrence efficacyandsafetyofareadytodrinkbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT bertigergerald efficacyandsafetyofareadytodrinkbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT leejohnsonkenneth efficacyandsafetyofareadytodrinkbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT ayalajulia efficacyandsafetyofareadytodrinkbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT seifuyodit efficacyandsafetyofareadytodrinkbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT brogadirstuartp efficacyandsafetyofareadytodrinkbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial