Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial
BACKGROUND: We performed a randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, multicenter, non-inferiority (NI) study to compare the safety and efficacy of a ready-to-drink formulation of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid (SPMC oral solution) with a powder formulation (P/MC powder) for ora...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31205487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284819851510 |
_version_ | 1783421608807890944 |
---|---|
author | Hookey, Lawrence Bertiger, Gerald Lee Johnson, Kenneth Ayala, Julia Seifu, Yodit Brogadir, Stuart P |
author_facet | Hookey, Lawrence Bertiger, Gerald Lee Johnson, Kenneth Ayala, Julia Seifu, Yodit Brogadir, Stuart P |
author_sort | Hookey, Lawrence |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We performed a randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, multicenter, non-inferiority (NI) study to compare the safety and efficacy of a ready-to-drink formulation of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid (SPMC oral solution) with a powder formulation (P/MC powder) for oral solution. METHODS: Eligible participants (adults undergoing elective colonoscopy) were randomized 1:1 to split-dose SPMC oral solution or P/MC powder. The primary efficacy endpoint assessed overall colon-cleansing quality with the Aronchick Scale (AS), and the key secondary efficacy endpoint rated quality of right colon cleansing with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Assessments were performed by a treatment-blinded endoscopist. Tolerability was assessed using the Mayo Clinic Bowel Prep Tolerability Questionnaire. Safety assessments included adverse events and laboratory evaluations. RESULTS: The study included 901 participants: 448 for SPMC oral solution; 453 for P/MC powder. SPMC oral solution demonstrated non-inferiority to P/MC powder {87.7% (393/448) responders versus 81.5% (369/453) responders [difference (95% confidence interval): 6.3% (1.8, 10.9)]}. The key secondary efficacy objective assessing the right colon was also met. According to the prespecified hierarchical testing, after meeting the primary and key secondary objectives, SPMC oral solution was tested for superiority to P/MC powder for the primary endpoint (p = 0.0067). SPMC oral solution was well tolerated. Most common adverse events were nausea (3.1% versus 2.9%), headache (2.7% versus 3.1%), hypermagnesemia (2.0% versus 5.1%), and vomiting (1.3% versus 0.7%) for SPMC oral solution and P/MC powder, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ready-to-drink SPMC oral solution showed superior efficacy of overall colon cleansing compared with P/MC powder, with similar safety and tolerability. [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03017235.] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6535705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65357052019-06-14 Efficacy and safety of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial Hookey, Lawrence Bertiger, Gerald Lee Johnson, Kenneth Ayala, Julia Seifu, Yodit Brogadir, Stuart P Therap Adv Gastroenterol Original Research BACKGROUND: We performed a randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, multicenter, non-inferiority (NI) study to compare the safety and efficacy of a ready-to-drink formulation of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid (SPMC oral solution) with a powder formulation (P/MC powder) for oral solution. METHODS: Eligible participants (adults undergoing elective colonoscopy) were randomized 1:1 to split-dose SPMC oral solution or P/MC powder. The primary efficacy endpoint assessed overall colon-cleansing quality with the Aronchick Scale (AS), and the key secondary efficacy endpoint rated quality of right colon cleansing with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Assessments were performed by a treatment-blinded endoscopist. Tolerability was assessed using the Mayo Clinic Bowel Prep Tolerability Questionnaire. Safety assessments included adverse events and laboratory evaluations. RESULTS: The study included 901 participants: 448 for SPMC oral solution; 453 for P/MC powder. SPMC oral solution demonstrated non-inferiority to P/MC powder {87.7% (393/448) responders versus 81.5% (369/453) responders [difference (95% confidence interval): 6.3% (1.8, 10.9)]}. The key secondary efficacy objective assessing the right colon was also met. According to the prespecified hierarchical testing, after meeting the primary and key secondary objectives, SPMC oral solution was tested for superiority to P/MC powder for the primary endpoint (p = 0.0067). SPMC oral solution was well tolerated. Most common adverse events were nausea (3.1% versus 2.9%), headache (2.7% versus 3.1%), hypermagnesemia (2.0% versus 5.1%), and vomiting (1.3% versus 0.7%) for SPMC oral solution and P/MC powder, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ready-to-drink SPMC oral solution showed superior efficacy of overall colon cleansing compared with P/MC powder, with similar safety and tolerability. [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03017235.] SAGE Publications 2019-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6535705/ /pubmed/31205487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284819851510 Text en © The Author(s), 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hookey, Lawrence Bertiger, Gerald Lee Johnson, Kenneth Ayala, Julia Seifu, Yodit Brogadir, Stuart P Efficacy and safety of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial |
title | Efficacy and safety of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31205487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284819851510 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hookeylawrence efficacyandsafetyofareadytodrinkbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT bertigergerald efficacyandsafetyofareadytodrinkbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT leejohnsonkenneth efficacyandsafetyofareadytodrinkbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT ayalajulia efficacyandsafetyofareadytodrinkbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT seifuyodit efficacyandsafetyofareadytodrinkbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT brogadirstuartp efficacyandsafetyofareadytodrinkbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial |