Cargando…
Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis: potential future trial designs
Clinical trials of new treatments in multiple sclerosis (MS) currently require large sample sizes and long durations in order to yield reliable results. The differential responses of an already heterogeneous population of MS patients to individual disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) will further comp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31205492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756286419847095 |
_version_ | 1783421612339494912 |
---|---|
author | Manouchehri, Navid Zhang, Yinan Salter, Amber Hussain, Rehana Z. Hartung, Hans-Peter Hemmer, Bernhard Linker, Ralf Segal, Benjamin M. Cutter, Gary Stüve, Olaf |
author_facet | Manouchehri, Navid Zhang, Yinan Salter, Amber Hussain, Rehana Z. Hartung, Hans-Peter Hemmer, Bernhard Linker, Ralf Segal, Benjamin M. Cutter, Gary Stüve, Olaf |
author_sort | Manouchehri, Navid |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical trials of new treatments in multiple sclerosis (MS) currently require large sample sizes and long durations in order to yield reliable results. The differential responses of an already heterogeneous population of MS patients to individual disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) will further complicate future trials. MS trials with smaller samples and faster outcomes are conceivable through the substitution of current clinical and MRI outcomes with objectively measureable genomic and proteomic biomarkers. Currently, biomarkers that could be utilized for diagnosis and monitoring of MS disease activity are in the early validation phase. The power of single biomarkers or multiple correlated biomarkers to predict prognosis and response to treatment could initially be compared with currently accepted methods. These prospectively validated disease biomarkers could then be used to subcategorize the spectrum of MS patients into a finite number of endophenotypes with demonstrable different molecular pathogeneses and DMT response profiles. Newly developed DMT could potentially be assessed within specific endophenotypes and compared with pharmacogenomically relevant active comparator DMT. This approach may increase the efficiency of MS trials through homogenization of patient population and minimization of nonresponders in study groups, providing the potential for the development of targeted therapies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6535717 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65357172019-06-14 Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis: potential future trial designs Manouchehri, Navid Zhang, Yinan Salter, Amber Hussain, Rehana Z. Hartung, Hans-Peter Hemmer, Bernhard Linker, Ralf Segal, Benjamin M. Cutter, Gary Stüve, Olaf Ther Adv Neurol Disord Review Clinical trials of new treatments in multiple sclerosis (MS) currently require large sample sizes and long durations in order to yield reliable results. The differential responses of an already heterogeneous population of MS patients to individual disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) will further complicate future trials. MS trials with smaller samples and faster outcomes are conceivable through the substitution of current clinical and MRI outcomes with objectively measureable genomic and proteomic biomarkers. Currently, biomarkers that could be utilized for diagnosis and monitoring of MS disease activity are in the early validation phase. The power of single biomarkers or multiple correlated biomarkers to predict prognosis and response to treatment could initially be compared with currently accepted methods. These prospectively validated disease biomarkers could then be used to subcategorize the spectrum of MS patients into a finite number of endophenotypes with demonstrable different molecular pathogeneses and DMT response profiles. Newly developed DMT could potentially be assessed within specific endophenotypes and compared with pharmacogenomically relevant active comparator DMT. This approach may increase the efficiency of MS trials through homogenization of patient population and minimization of nonresponders in study groups, providing the potential for the development of targeted therapies. SAGE Publications 2019-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6535717/ /pubmed/31205492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756286419847095 Text en © The Author(s), 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Manouchehri, Navid Zhang, Yinan Salter, Amber Hussain, Rehana Z. Hartung, Hans-Peter Hemmer, Bernhard Linker, Ralf Segal, Benjamin M. Cutter, Gary Stüve, Olaf Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis: potential future trial designs |
title | Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis: potential future trial designs |
title_full | Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis: potential future trial designs |
title_fullStr | Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis: potential future trial designs |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis: potential future trial designs |
title_short | Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis: potential future trial designs |
title_sort | clinical trials in multiple sclerosis: potential future trial designs |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31205492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756286419847095 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manouchehrinavid clinicaltrialsinmultiplesclerosispotentialfuturetrialdesigns AT zhangyinan clinicaltrialsinmultiplesclerosispotentialfuturetrialdesigns AT salteramber clinicaltrialsinmultiplesclerosispotentialfuturetrialdesigns AT hussainrehanaz clinicaltrialsinmultiplesclerosispotentialfuturetrialdesigns AT hartunghanspeter clinicaltrialsinmultiplesclerosispotentialfuturetrialdesigns AT hemmerbernhard clinicaltrialsinmultiplesclerosispotentialfuturetrialdesigns AT linkerralf clinicaltrialsinmultiplesclerosispotentialfuturetrialdesigns AT segalbenjaminm clinicaltrialsinmultiplesclerosispotentialfuturetrialdesigns AT cuttergary clinicaltrialsinmultiplesclerosispotentialfuturetrialdesigns AT stuveolaf clinicaltrialsinmultiplesclerosispotentialfuturetrialdesigns |