Cargando…

Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis: potential future trial designs

Clinical trials of new treatments in multiple sclerosis (MS) currently require large sample sizes and long durations in order to yield reliable results. The differential responses of an already heterogeneous population of MS patients to individual disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) will further comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manouchehri, Navid, Zhang, Yinan, Salter, Amber, Hussain, Rehana Z., Hartung, Hans-Peter, Hemmer, Bernhard, Linker, Ralf, Segal, Benjamin M., Cutter, Gary, Stüve, Olaf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31205492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756286419847095
_version_ 1783421612339494912
author Manouchehri, Navid
Zhang, Yinan
Salter, Amber
Hussain, Rehana Z.
Hartung, Hans-Peter
Hemmer, Bernhard
Linker, Ralf
Segal, Benjamin M.
Cutter, Gary
Stüve, Olaf
author_facet Manouchehri, Navid
Zhang, Yinan
Salter, Amber
Hussain, Rehana Z.
Hartung, Hans-Peter
Hemmer, Bernhard
Linker, Ralf
Segal, Benjamin M.
Cutter, Gary
Stüve, Olaf
author_sort Manouchehri, Navid
collection PubMed
description Clinical trials of new treatments in multiple sclerosis (MS) currently require large sample sizes and long durations in order to yield reliable results. The differential responses of an already heterogeneous population of MS patients to individual disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) will further complicate future trials. MS trials with smaller samples and faster outcomes are conceivable through the substitution of current clinical and MRI outcomes with objectively measureable genomic and proteomic biomarkers. Currently, biomarkers that could be utilized for diagnosis and monitoring of MS disease activity are in the early validation phase. The power of single biomarkers or multiple correlated biomarkers to predict prognosis and response to treatment could initially be compared with currently accepted methods. These prospectively validated disease biomarkers could then be used to subcategorize the spectrum of MS patients into a finite number of endophenotypes with demonstrable different molecular pathogeneses and DMT response profiles. Newly developed DMT could potentially be assessed within specific endophenotypes and compared with pharmacogenomically relevant active comparator DMT. This approach may increase the efficiency of MS trials through homogenization of patient population and minimization of nonresponders in study groups, providing the potential for the development of targeted therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6535717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65357172019-06-14 Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis: potential future trial designs Manouchehri, Navid Zhang, Yinan Salter, Amber Hussain, Rehana Z. Hartung, Hans-Peter Hemmer, Bernhard Linker, Ralf Segal, Benjamin M. Cutter, Gary Stüve, Olaf Ther Adv Neurol Disord Review Clinical trials of new treatments in multiple sclerosis (MS) currently require large sample sizes and long durations in order to yield reliable results. The differential responses of an already heterogeneous population of MS patients to individual disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) will further complicate future trials. MS trials with smaller samples and faster outcomes are conceivable through the substitution of current clinical and MRI outcomes with objectively measureable genomic and proteomic biomarkers. Currently, biomarkers that could be utilized for diagnosis and monitoring of MS disease activity are in the early validation phase. The power of single biomarkers or multiple correlated biomarkers to predict prognosis and response to treatment could initially be compared with currently accepted methods. These prospectively validated disease biomarkers could then be used to subcategorize the spectrum of MS patients into a finite number of endophenotypes with demonstrable different molecular pathogeneses and DMT response profiles. Newly developed DMT could potentially be assessed within specific endophenotypes and compared with pharmacogenomically relevant active comparator DMT. This approach may increase the efficiency of MS trials through homogenization of patient population and minimization of nonresponders in study groups, providing the potential for the development of targeted therapies. SAGE Publications 2019-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6535717/ /pubmed/31205492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756286419847095 Text en © The Author(s), 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Manouchehri, Navid
Zhang, Yinan
Salter, Amber
Hussain, Rehana Z.
Hartung, Hans-Peter
Hemmer, Bernhard
Linker, Ralf
Segal, Benjamin M.
Cutter, Gary
Stüve, Olaf
Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis: potential future trial designs
title Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis: potential future trial designs
title_full Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis: potential future trial designs
title_fullStr Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis: potential future trial designs
title_full_unstemmed Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis: potential future trial designs
title_short Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis: potential future trial designs
title_sort clinical trials in multiple sclerosis: potential future trial designs
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6535717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31205492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756286419847095
work_keys_str_mv AT manouchehrinavid clinicaltrialsinmultiplesclerosispotentialfuturetrialdesigns
AT zhangyinan clinicaltrialsinmultiplesclerosispotentialfuturetrialdesigns
AT salteramber clinicaltrialsinmultiplesclerosispotentialfuturetrialdesigns
AT hussainrehanaz clinicaltrialsinmultiplesclerosispotentialfuturetrialdesigns
AT hartunghanspeter clinicaltrialsinmultiplesclerosispotentialfuturetrialdesigns
AT hemmerbernhard clinicaltrialsinmultiplesclerosispotentialfuturetrialdesigns
AT linkerralf clinicaltrialsinmultiplesclerosispotentialfuturetrialdesigns
AT segalbenjaminm clinicaltrialsinmultiplesclerosispotentialfuturetrialdesigns
AT cuttergary clinicaltrialsinmultiplesclerosispotentialfuturetrialdesigns
AT stuveolaf clinicaltrialsinmultiplesclerosispotentialfuturetrialdesigns